JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2026. Том 71. № 4

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2026-71-4-5-11

А.К. Чигасова1,2,3, А.Н. Осипов1,2

АНАЛИЗ ФОКУСОВ ФОСФОРИЛИРОВАНОГО ГИСТОНА Н2АХ В РАДИОБИОЛОГИИ: ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

1 Федеральный медицинский биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна ФМБА России, Москва

2 Федеральный исследовательский центр химической физики им. Н.Н. Семенова РАН, Москва

3 Институт биохимической физики им. Н.М. Эмануэля РАН, Москва

Контактное лицо: Андреян Николаевич Осипов, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ 

Введение

Общая характеристика Н2АХ 

Природа спонтнанных (фоновых) фокусов γH2AX

Образование фокусов γH2AX в облученных клетках 

Влияние структуры хроматина на образование и деградацию радиационно-индуцированных фокусов γH2AX

Влияние фазы клеточного цикла на образование и деградацию радиационно-индуцированных фокусов γH2AX

Остаточные радиационно-индуцированные фокусы γH2AX

Заключение

 

Ключевые слова: γH2AX, повреждения ДНК, репарация ДНК, ионизирующие излучение

Для цитирования: Чигасова А.К., Осипов А.Н. Анализ фокусов фосфорилированного гистона H2AX в радиобиологии: обзор литературы // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2026. Т. 71. № 4. С. 5–11. DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2026-71- 4-5-11

 

Список литературы

1.Ahnstrom G, Erixon K. Radiation Induced Strand Breakage in DNA from Mammalian Cells. Strand Separation in Alkaline Solution. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine. 1973;23;3:285-9. 

2.Blocher D. DNA Double Strand Breaks in Ehrlich Ascites Tumour Cells at Low Doses of X-Rays. I. Determination of Induced Breaks by Centrifugation at Reduced Speed. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine. 1982;42;3:317-28. 

3.Schwartz D.C., Cantor C.R. Separation of Yeast Chromosome-Sized DNAs by Pulsed Field Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Cell. 1984;37;1:67-75. 

4.Osipov A., Arkhangelskaya E., Vinokurov A., Smetaninа N., Zhavoronkov A., Klokov D. DNA Comet Giemsa Staining for Conventional Bright-Field Microscopy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014;15;4:6086-95. Doi: 10.3390/ijms15046086.

5.Bushmanov A., Vorobyeva N., Molodtsova D., Osipov A.N. Utilization of DNA Double-Strand Breaks for Biodosimetry of Ionizing Radiation Exposure. Environmental Advances. 2022;8:100207. Doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100207.

6.Lobrich M., Shibata A., Beucher A., Fisher A., Ensminger M., Goodarzi A.A., et al. Gamma-H2AX Foci Analysis for Monitoring DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: Strengths, Limitations and Optimization. Cell Cycle. 2010;9;4:662-9. Doi: 10.4161/cc.9.4.10764.

7.Rogakou E.P., Pilch D.R., Orr A.H., Ivanova V.S., Bonner W.M. DNA Double-Stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273;10:5858-68. 

8.Pantazis P., Bonner W.M. Quantitative Determination of Histone Modification. H2A Acetylation and Phosphorylation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1981;256;9:4669-75. 

9.Ikura T., Tashiro S., Kakino A., Shima H., Jacob N., Amunugama R., et al. DNA Damage-Dependent Acetylation and Ubiquitination of H2AX Enhances Chromatin Dynamics. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2007;27;20:7028-40. Doi: 10.1128/MCB.00579-07.

10.Chew Y.C., Camporeale G., Kothapalli N., Sarath G., Zempleni J. Lysine Residues in N-Terminal and C-Terminal Regions of Human Histone H2A are Targets for Biotinylation by Biotinidase. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2006;17;4:225-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.05.003.

11.Xiao A., Li H., Shechter D., Ahn S.H., Fabrizio L.A., Erdjument-Bromage H., et al. WSTF Regulates the H2A.X DNA Damage Response Via a Novel Tyrosine Kinase Activity. Nature. 2009;457;7225:57-62. Doi: 10.1038/nature07668.

12.Pinto D.M., Flaus A. Structure and Function of Histone H2AX. Sub-Cellular Biochemistry. 2010;50:55-78. Doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3471-7_4.

13.Rothkamm K., Lobrich M. Evidence for a Lack of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Cells Exposed to Very Low X-Ray Doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100;9:5057-62. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830918100.

14.Rogakou E.P., Boon C., Redon C., Bonner W.M. Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1999;146;5:905-16. 

15.MacPhail S.H., Banath J.P., Yu Y., Chu E., Olive P.L. Cell Cycle-Dependent Expression of Phosphorylated Histone H2AX: Reduced Expression in Unirradiated but not X-Irradiated G1-Phase Cells. Radiation Research. 2003;159;6:759-67. 

16.Bonner W.M., Redon C.E., Dickey J.S., Nakamura A.J., Sedelnikova O.A., Solier S., et al. Gamma-H2AX and Cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2008;8;12:957-67. Doi: 10.1038/nrc2523.

17.Wilson P.F., Nham P.B., Urbin S.S., Hinz J.M., Jones I.M., Thompson L.H. Inter-Individual Variation in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Fibroblasts Before and after Exposure to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation. Mutation Research. 2010;683;1-2:91-7. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.10.013.

18.Nakamura A.J., Chiang Y.J., Hathcock K.S., Horikawa I., Sedelnikova O.A., Hodes R.J., et al. Both Telomeric and Non-Telomeric DNA Damage are Determinants of Mammalian Cellular Senescence. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2008;1;1:6. Doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-1-6.

19.Herbig U., Ferreira M., Condel L., Carey D., Sedivy J.M. Cellular Senescence in Aging Primates. Science. 2006;311;5765:1257. Doi: 10.1126/science.1122446.

20.Nakamura A.J., Redon C.E., Bonner W.M., Sedelnikova O.A. Telomere-Dependent and Telomere-Independent Origins of Endogenous DNA Damage in Tumor Cells. Aging. 2009;1;2:212-8. Doi: 10.18632/aging.100019.

21.Markova E., Schultz N., Belyaev I.Y. Kinetics and Dose-Response of Residual 53BP1/gamma-H2AX foci: Co-Localization, Relationship with DSB Repair and Clonogenic Survival. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2007;83;5:319-29. Doi: 10.1080/09553000601170469.

22.Costes S.V., Boissiere A., Ravani S., Romano R., Parvin B., Barcellos-Hoff MH. Imaging Features that Discriminate between Foci Induced by High- and Low-LET Radiation in Human Fibroblasts. Radiation Research. 2006;165;5:505-15. Doi: 10.1667/RR3538.1.

23.McManus K.J., Hendzel M.J. ATM-Dependent DNA Damage-Independent Mitotic Phosphorylation of H2AX in Normally Growing Mammalian Cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2005;16;10:5013-25. Doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0065.

24.Asaithamby A., Chen D.J. Cellular Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks after Low-Dose Gamma-Irradiation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37;12:3912-23. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp237.

25.Mahrhofer H., Burger S., Oppitz U., Flentje M., Djuzenova C.S. Radiation Induced DNA Damage and Damage Repair in Human Tumor and Fibroblast Cell Lines Assessed by Histone H2AX Phosphorylation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2006;64;2:573-80. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.037.

26.Schollnberger H., Mitchel R.E., Crawford-Brown D.J., Hofmann W. Nonlinear Dose-Response Relationships and Inducible Cellular Defence Mechanisms. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2002;22;3A:A21-5. 

27.Kotenko K.V., Bushmanov A.Y., Ozerov I.V., Guryev D.V., Anchishkina N.A., Smetanina N.M., et al. Changes in the Number of Double-Strand DNA Breaks in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells Exposed to Gamma-Radiation with Different Dose Rates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013;14;7:13719-26. Doi: 10.3390/ijms140713719.

28.Neumaier T., Swenson J., Pham C., Polyzos A., Lo A.T., Yang P., et al. Evidence for Formation of DNA Repair Centers and Dose-Response Nonlinearity in Human Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109;2:443-8. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117849108.

29.Masuda Y., Kamiya K. Molecular Nature of Radiation Injury and DNA Repair Disorders Associated with Radiosensitivity. International Journal of Hematology. 2012;95;3:239-45. Doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1008-y.

30.Durocher D., Jackson S.P. DNA-PK, ATM and ATR as Sensors of DNA Damage: Variations on a Theme? Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2001;13;2:225-31. 

31.Paull T.T., Rogakou E.P., Yamazaki V., Kirchgessner C.U., Gellert M., Bonner W.M. A Critical Role for Histone H2AX in Recruitment of Repair Factors to Nuclear Foci after DNA Damage. Current Biology. 2000;10;15:886-95. 

32.Burma S., Chen B.P., Murphy M., Kurimasa A., Chen D.J. ATM Phosphorylates Histone H2AX in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276;45:42462-7. Doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100466200.

33.Stucki M., Jackson S.P. Gamma-H2AX and MDC1: Anchoring the DNA-Damage-Response Machinery to Broken Chromosomes. DNA Repair. 2006;5;5:534-43. Doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.01.012.

34.Peng Y., Woods R.G., Beamish H., Ye R., Lees-Miller S.P., Lavin M.F., et al. Deficiency in the Catalytic Subunit of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Causes Down-Regulation of ATM. Cancer Research. 2005;65;5:1670-7. Doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3451.

35.Shrivastav M., Miller C.A., De Haro L.P., Durant S.T., Chen B.P., Chen D.J., et al. DNA-PKcs and ATM Co-Regulate DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. DNA Repair. 2009;8;8:920-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.05.006.

36.An J., Huang Y.C., Xu Q.Z., Zhou L.J., Shang Z.F., Huang B., et al. DNA-PKcs Plays a Dominant Role in the Regulation of H2AX Phosphorylation in Response to DNA Damage and Cell Cycle Progression. BMC Molecular Biology. 2010;11:18. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-18.

37.Flassig R.J., Maubach G., Tager C., Sundmacher K., Naumann M. Experimental Design, Validation and Computational Modeling Uncover DNA Damage Sensing by DNA-PK and ATM. Molecular Biosystems. 2014;10;7:1978-86. Doi: 10.1039/c4mb00093e.

38.Ward I.M., Chen J. Histone H2AX is Phosphorylated in an ATR-Dependent Manner in Response to Replicational Stress. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276;51:47759-62. Doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100569200.

39.Blackford A.N., Jackson S.P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Molecular Cell. 2017;66;6:801-17. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015.

40.Abramenkovs A., Stenerlow B. Measurement of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylation Using Flow Cytometry Provides a Reliable Estimate of DNA Repair Capacity. Radiation research. 2017;188;6:597-604. Doi: 10.1667/RR14693.1.

41.Suzuki K., Okada H., Yamauchi M., Oka Y., Kodama S., Watanabe M. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phosphorylated ATM Foci Induced by Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res. 2006;165;5:499-504. Doi: 10.1667/RR3542.1.

42.Bakkenist C.J., Kastan M.B. DNA Damage Activates ATM through Intermolecular Autophosphorylation and Dimer Dissociation. Nature. 2003;421;6922:499-506. Doi: 10.1038/nature01368.

43.Kitagawa R., Kastan M.B. The ATM-Dependent DNA Damage Signaling Pathway. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 2005;70:99-109. Doi: 10.1101/sqb.2005.70.002.

44.Yamauchi M., Oka Y., Yamamoto M., Niimura K., Uchida M., Kodama S., et al. Growth of Persistent Foci of DNA Damage Checkpoint Factors is Essential for Amplification of G1 Checkpoint Signaling. DNA Repair. 2008;7;3:405-17. Doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.11.011.

45.Enns L., Rasouli-Nia A., Hendzel M., Marples B., Weinfeld M. Association of ATM Activation and DNA Repair with Induced Radioresistance after Low-Dose Irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;166;1-4:131-6. Doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv203.

46.Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., Deckbar D., Ziv Y., Shiloh Y., Lobrich M., et al. ATM Signaling Facilitates Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Associated with Heterochromatin. Molecular Cell. 2008;31;2:167-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.017.

47.Kim J.A., Kruhlak M., Dotiwala F., Nussenzweig A., Haber J.E. Heterochromatin is Refractory to Gamma-H2AX Modification in Yeast and Mammals. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2007;178;2:209-18. Doi: 10.1083/jcb.200612031.

48.Cowell I.G., Sunter N.J., Singh P.B., Austin C.A., Durkacz B.W., Tilby M.J. Gamma-H2AX Foci form Preferentially in Euchromatin after Ionising-Radiation. PloS One. 2007;2;10:e1057. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001057.

49.Kruhlak M.J., Celeste A., Dellaire G., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Muller W.G., McNally J.G., et al. Changes in Chromatin Structure and Mobility in Living Cells at Sites of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2006;172;6:823-34. Doi: 10.1083/jcb.200510015.

50.Sancar A., Lindsey-Boltz L.A., Unsal-Kacmaz K., Linn S. Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2004;73:39-85. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723.

51.Ziv Y., Bielopolski D., Galanty Y., Lukas C., Taya Y., Schultz D.C., et al. Chromatin Relaxation in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks is Modulated by a Novel ATM- and KAP-1 Dependent Pathway. Nature Cell Biology. 2006;8;8:870-6. Doi: 10.1038/ncb1446.

52.Goodarzi A.A., Kurka T., Jeggo P.A. KAP-1 Phosphorylation Regulates CHD3 Nucleosome Remodeling during the DNA Double-Strand Break Response. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2011;18;7:831-9. Doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2077.

53.Beucher A., Birraux J., Tchouandong L., Barton O., Shibata A., Conrad S., et al. ATM and Artemis Promote Homologous Recombination of Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks in G2. The EMBO Journal. 2009;28;21:3413-27. Doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.276.

54.Bee L., Fabris S., Cherubini R., Mognato M., Celotti L. The Efficiency of Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous end Joining Systems in Repairing Double-Strand Breaks during Cell Cycle Progression. PloS One. 2013;8;7:e69061. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069061.

55.Belov O., Chigasova A., Pustovalova M., Osipov A., Eremin P., Vorobyeva N., et al. Dose-Dependent Shift in Relative Contribution of Homologous Recombination to DNA Repair after Low-LET Ionizing Radiation Exposure: Empirical Evidence and Numerical Simulation. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45;9:7352-73. Doi: 10.3390/cimb45090465.

56.Osipov A., Chigasova A., Yashkina E., Ignatov M., Fedotov Y., Molodtsova D., et al. Residual Foci of DNA Damage Response Proteins in Relation to Cellular Senescence and Autophagy in X-Ray Irradiated Fibroblasts. Cells. 2023;12;8:1209. Doi: 10.3390/cells12081209.

57.Osipov A., Chigasova A., Belov O., Yashkina E., Ignatov M., Fedotov Y., et al. Dose Threshold for Residual γH2AX, 53BP1, pATM and p-p53 (Ser-15) Foci in X-ray Irradiated Human Fibroblasts. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2025;101;3:254-63. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2024.2445581.

58.Vaurijoux A., Voisin P., Freneau A., Barquinero J.F., Gruel G. Transmission of Persistent Ionizing Radiation-Induced foci Through Cell Division in Human Primary Cells. Mutation Research. 2017;797-799:15-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.03.003.

59.Minakawa Y., Atsumi Y., Shinohara A., Murakami Y., Yoshioka K. Gamma-Irradiated Quiescent Cells Repair Directly Induced Double-Strand Breaks but Accumulate Persistent Double-Strand Breaks during Subsequent DNA Replication. Genes to Cells: Devoted to Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms. 2016;21;7:789-97. Doi: 10.1111/gtc.12381.

60.Alessio N., Del Gaudio S., Capasso S., Di Bernardo G., Cappabianca S., Cipollaro M., et al. Low Dose Radiation Induced Senescence of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Impaired the Autophagy Process. Oncotarget. 2015;6;10:8155-66. Doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2692.

61.Chowdhury D., Keogh M.C., Ishii H., Peterson C.L., Buratowski S., Lieberman J. Gamma-H2AX Dephosphorylation by Protein Phosphatase 2A Facilitates DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. Molecular cell. 2005;20;5:801-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.003.

62.Chowdhury D., Xu X., Zhong X., Ahmed F., Zhong J., Liao J., et al. A PP4-Phosphatase Complex Dephosphorylates Gamma-H2AX Generated during DNA Replication. Molecular Cell. 2008;31;1:33-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.016.

63.Banath J.P., Klokov D, MacPhail SH, Banuelos CA, Olive PL. Residual Gamma-H2AX Foci as an Indication of Lethal DNA Lesions. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:4. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-4.

64.Sak A., Stueben G., Groneberg M., Bocker W., Stuschke M. Targeting of Rad51-Dependent Homologous Recombination: Implications for the Radiation Sensitivity of Human Lung Cancer Cell Lines. British Journal of Cancer. 2005;92;6:1089-97. Doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602457.

 

  PDF (RUS) Полная версия статьи

 

Конфликт интересов. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов.

Финансирование.  Исследования выполнены в рамках государственного задания Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации (№ 1024122500008-3, шифр FFZE-2025-0030).

Участие авторов. Cтатья подготовлена с равным участием авторов.

Поступила: 20.03.2026. Принята к публикации: 25.04.2026.

 

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

4346764
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
3845
3010
7256
19015
91258
121013
4346764

Forecast today
3744


Your IP:216.73.217.165