JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017. Vol. 62. No. 4. P. 24-30

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY

DOI: 10.12737/article_59b1077eca2810.73078621

Sonography in the Diagnosis of Fractures of the Maxillofacial Region

N.A. Akramova, Yu.M. Khodjibekova

Tashkent State Dental Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N.A. Akramova – Assistant of the Dep.; Yu.M. Khodjibekova – Associate Prof.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the role and significance of ultrasonography in the general complex of methods of radiation diagnosis of bone fractures of the maxillofacial region.

Material and methods: Ultrasound examination was carried out on 104 patients at the age of 6–59 with trauma of the maxillofacial region. All patients were examined with sonography (SLE-501 device with linear frequency controller at 7.5 MHz, Lithuania), radiography and multislice computed tomography (Somation Emotion 6 device, Siemens, Germany).

Results: Fractures of the maxillofacial bones confirmed in 96 patients, including 36 isolated, 60 multiple and associated injuries of bones of the maxillofacial region. All injuries were identified by CT with 3D reconstruction, thus the method was adopted as verifying during analysis and comparison of results produced by other methods of visualization.

The ultrasonography findings revealed the following: interruption of the cortical layer with or without displacement of bone fragments, bone contour deformation. In 11 out of 13 cases of mandibular fractures with negative sonographic signs were detected by sonography with functional tests with the mouth opening. In comparison with X-ray, ultrasonography was more sensitive in detecting fractures (94.0 % to 81.5 %), especially in fractures of the front wall of the maxillary sinus, articular and coronoid process of the mandible.

Ultrasonographic examination was carried out with 57 patients after closed and open reposition. The unsatisfactory condition of bone fragments, which need re-repositioning, were detected in 25. In 11 patients sonography was used intraoperatively to control the repositioning of the bone fragments, thus making it possible to achieve satisfactory results after operations.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography has proved to be a valuable tool in detecting fractures in the facial bones in addition to X-ray examination. Particular value of sonography is a control for repositioning bone fragments.

Key words: trauma, maxillofacial region, sonography

REFERENCES

  1. Nigam A., Goni A., Benjamin A., Dasgupta A.R. The value of radiographs in the management of the fractured nose. Arch. Emerg. Med. 1993. Vol. 10. P. 293–297.
  2. Logan M.O., Driscoll K., Masterson J. The utility of nasal bone radiographs in nasal trauma. Clin. Radiol. 1994. Vol. 49. P. 192–194.
  3. Friedrich R.E., Heiland M., Bartel-Friedrich S. Potentials of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2003. Vol. 7. P. 226–229.
  4. Aburn N.S., Sergott R.C. Color Doppler imaging of the ocular and orbital blood vessels. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 1993. Vol. 4. No. 6. P. 3–6.
  5. Jank S., Emshoff R., Etzelsdorfer M. et al. Ultrasound versus computed tomography in the imaging of orbital floor fractures. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2004. Vol. 62. P. 150–154.
  6. Nezafati S., Javadrashid R., Rad S., Akrami S. Comparison of ultrasonography with submentovertex films and computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of zygomatic arch fractures. Dento-maxillofac. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 39. P. 11–16.
  7. Rabukhina N.A., Butsan S.B. Ispolzovaniye spiralnoy KT dlya trekhmernogo kompyuternogo modelirovaniya pri planirovanii khirurgicheskogo lecheniya defektov i deformatsiy litsevogo skeleta. Vestnik rentgenol. i radiol. 2009. Vol. 1. P. 10–15. (In Russ.).
  8. McCann P.J., Brocklebank L.M., Ayoub A.F. Assessment of zygomatico-orbital complex fractures using ultrasonography. Brit. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2000. Vol. 4. P. 525–529.
  9. . Serova N.S. Luchevaya diagnostika sochetannykh povrezhdeniy kostey litsevogo cherepa i struktur orbity. – M.: Disc.kand.med.nauk. 2006. 130 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Lezhnev D.A., Vasilyev A.Yu. Luchevaya diagnostika travmaticheskikh povrezhdeniy chelyustno-litsevoy oblasti. Byull. sibirskoy meditsiny. 2008. No. 3. P. 92–96. (In Russ.).
  11. Jank S., Emshoff R., Etzelsdorfer M. et al. Ultrasound versus computed tomography in the imaging of orbital floor fractures. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2004. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 150–154.
  12. Ogunmuyiwa S.A., Fatusi O.A., Ugboko V.I. The validity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Internat. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 500–505.
  13. Singh K.S., Jayachandran S. A comparative study on the diagnostic utility of ultrasonography with conventional radiography and computed tomography scan in detection of zygomatic arch and mandibular fractures. Amer. J. Emergency Med. 2014. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 166–169.
  14. Sreeram M.P., Rupesh M., Ravindran C. Use of ultrasound as a screening tool in the maxillofacial fractures. Internat. Med. J. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 6. P. 573–577.
  15. Sangayeva L.M. Luchevaya diagnostika travm glaza i struktur orbity. Moscow: Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk. 2009. 21 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Rahul P. Menon, Sanjay Kumar Roy Chowdhuty. Comparision of ultrasonography with conventional radiography in the diagnosis of zygomatic complex fractures. J. Cranio-Maxillo Fac. Surg. 2016. Vol. 44. No. 4. P. 353–356.
  17. Raby N., Moore D. Radiography of facial trauma, the lateral view is not required. Clin. Radiol. 1998. Vol. 55. No. 3. P. 218–220.
  18. Maha Sallam, Ghada Khalifa, Fatma Ibrahim Mohamed Taha. Ultrasonography vs computed tomography in imaging of zygomatic complex fractures. J. Amer. Sci. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 9. P. 524–533.
  19. Pi-Yun Chiu, Jen-Darchen, Ping-Yi Ko. Cheng-Yenchang Clinical assessment of the diagnostic value of facial radiography in facial trauma patients at the emergency department. Chin. J. Radiol. 2005. Vol. 30. P. 327–333.
  20. Pavlova O.Yu., Serova N.S., Medvedev Yu.A., Petruk P.S. Luchevaya diagnostika travm kostey sredney zony litsa. Russ.Electronic J. Radiol. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 39–44. (In Russ.).

Для цитирования: Akramova NA, Khodjibekova YuM. Sonography in the Diagnosis of Fractures of the Maxillofacial Region. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017;62(4):24-30. Russian. DOI: 10.12737/article_59b1077eca2810.73078621

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2927233
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
2235
2221
4470
33458
25528
113593
2927233

Forecast today
2328


Your IP:216.73.216.82