JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 2. P. 23–32

DOI: 10.12737/article_5ca5e2677a1a06.60363700

V.A. Klimanov1,2, A.S. Samoylov2, A.E. Gadzhinov3, Ya.A. Peshkin3

Physics of Proton Therapy Treatment Planning

1. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ;
2. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia;
3. Federal High-Tech Center for Medical Radiology of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Dimitrovgrad, Russia

V.A. Klimanov – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sci. Phys.-Math., Prof.;
A.S. Samoylov – Director General, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof. RAS;
A.E. Gadzhinov – radiotherapist;
Ya.A. Peshkin – radiologist

Abstract

The most important stage of radiation therapy of oncological diseases is the planning of radiation treatment. In this work, this complex process in relation to proton therapy is proposed to be divided into medical and physical planning. In conventional therapy with photons and electrons, the latter is usually called dosimetric planning, however, when applied to proton radiation therapy, this stage involves a significantly wider range of tasks related to the modification and scanning of the proton beam, spreading and compensation of ranges, taking into account when planning for uncertainties and finiteness of proton ranges, a decrease in the contribution to the dose of secondary neutrons, the creation of error-tolerant optimization algorithms for dosimetric plans, and, finally, a precision calculation of dose distributions. The paper discusses the main stages and problems of physical planning of proton radiation therapy. Particular attention is paid to the formation of an extended high-dose region (extended Bragg peak) using the beam scattering method and scanning method, and to the algorithms for calculating the dose distributions created by protons in the scattering and beam scanning systems. The most detailed consideration is given to different versions of the proton pencil beam method, which allows to increase the dose calculation accuracy and take into account the transverse scattering and fluctuations in proton energy losses, especially at the end of the path (halo effect), analytical and numerical methods. Scanning are divided into three main technologies: homogeneous scanning, single field uniform dose (SFUD), multi-field uniform dose (MFUD), often called intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Actual accounting problems are considered when planning the irradiation of the movement of organs, and uncertainties in determining path lengths and optimization of irradiation plans. In particular features, problems and modern approaches to the optimization of dosimetry plans of proton radiation therapy are discussed. It is noted that one of the most promising practical solutions for the uncertainty management in determining the path lengths of protons in optimization is to include possible errors in the objective function of the optimization algorithm. This technique ensures that an optimized irradiation plan will more reliably protect normal tissues and critical organs adjacent to the irradiation target from overexposure.

Key words: radiotherapy, protons, proton scattering, range modulation, pencil beam, dose, organ movement, range uncertainty, planning optimization

REFERENCES

  1. Gottschalk B. Lectures (BGtalks.zip) and a draft textbook (PBS.pdf in BGdocs.zip) available for free download at http://physics.harvard.edu/~gottschalk or the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) website: http://ptcog.web.psi.ch/
  2. Gottschalk B. Physics of Proton Interactions in Matte. In: Proton Therapy Physics. Ed. H. Paganetti. Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. P. 20-59.
  3. Lu H-M, Flanz J. Characteristics of Clinical Proton Beams. In: Proton Therapy Physics. Ed. H. Paganetti. Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. P. 103-24.
  4. Engelsman M. Physics of Treatment Planning for Single-Field Uniform dose. In: Proton Therapy Physics. Ed. H. Paganetti. Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. P. 305-35.
  5. Bortfeld T. An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams. Med Phys. 1997;24(12):2024-33.
  6. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Eds. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York. 1972.
  7. Boon SN. Dosimetry and quality control of scanning beams. Thesis. 1998. Groningen.
  8. Koehler AM, Schneider RJ, Sisterson J. Range modulator for proton and heavy ions. Nucl Instrum Methods. 1975;131:437-40.
  9. Smith AR. Proton therapy. Med Phys. 2009;36(2):556-68.
  10. Hogstrom KR, Mills MD, Almond PR. Electron beam dose calculations. Phys Med Biol. 1981;26:445-59.
  11. Hong L, Gotein M, Buccuilini M, et al. Pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:1305-30.
  12. Szymanowski H, Oelfke U. 2D pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:3313-31.
  13. Westerly DC, Mo X, Tome WA, et al. A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries. Med Phys. 2013;40: 061706. DOI: 10.1118/1.4804055.
  14. Clasie B, Paganetti H, Kooy HM. Dose Calculation Algorithms. In: Proton Therapy Physics. Ed. H. Paganetti. Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. P. 382-411.
  15. Eyges L. Multiple scattering with energy loss. Phys Rev. 1948;74:1534.
  16. Pelowitz DB. MCNPX User’s Manual, Version 2.7.0. Los Alamos National Laborator. 2011.
  17. Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J. Geant4 – a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Methods. A. 2003;506:250-303.
  18. Paganetti H. Monte Carlo simulation. In: Proton Therapy Physics. Ed. H. Paganetti. Taylor & Francis Group. 2012. P. 266-304.
  19. Lu HM, Brett К , Shapr G, et al. A respiratory-gated treatment system for proton therapy. Med Phys. 2007;34:3273-78.
  20. Furukawa T, Inaniwa T, Sato S, et al. Design study of a raster scanning system for moving target irradiation in heavy-ion therapy. Med Phys. 2007;34:1085-97.
  21. Bert C, Laito N, Schmidt A. Target motion tracking with scanned particle beam. Med Phys. 2007;34:4768-71.
  22. Bert C, Durante M. Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:R113-R144.
  23. Pflugfelder D, Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Worst case optimization: A method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:1689-700.
  24. Liao L, Lim GJ, Li Y. Robust Optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy plans with multi-isocenter large fields. Int. J. Particle Ther. 2016;4:305-11.

For citation: Chernyaev AP, Klenov GI, Bushmanov AYu, Pryanichnikov AA, Belikhin MA, Lykova EN. Proton Accelerators for Radiation Therapy. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(2):11-22. (Russian).

DOI: 10.12737/article_5ca5e2677a1a06.60363700

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2771550
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
1277
3219
4496
25438
79293
75709
2771550

Forecast today
18168


Your IP:216.73.216.9