JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 4. P. 56–63

DOI: 10.12737/article_5d1b46c9133942.84705406

Е.S. Sukhikh1,2, L.G. Sukhikh2, E.L. Malikov2, P.V. Izhevsky3, I.N. Sheino3, A.V. Vertinsky1,2, A.A. Baulin2,4

Uncertainty of Measurement Absorbed Dose by Gafchromic EBT3 Dosimeter for Clinical Electron and Photon Beams of Medical Accelerators

1. Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, Tomsk, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ;
2. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
3. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia;
4. Gamma Clinic High-Precision Radiology Centre (Gamma Medtechnology Ltd)., Obninsk, Russia

Е.S. Sukhikh – Head of Department, Assistant Professor, PhD Phys.-Math., Member of ESTRO, Member of EFOMP, Member of ISRS;
L.G. Sukhikh – Director of Research School of Physics, Dr. Sci. Phys-Math.;
E.L. Malikov – Researcher;
P.V. Izhevsky – Leading Researcher, Assistant Professor, PhD Med.;
I.N. Sheino – Head of the Lab., PhD Phys-Math.;
A.V. Vertinsky – Medical Physicist, PhD student;
A.A. Baulin – Medical Physicist, PhD student, Member of ISRS

Abstract

Purpose: Investigation of the relative errors of absorbed dose measurement based on polymer films Gafchromic EBT3 for clinical electron and photon beams of medical accelerators.

Material and methods: Polymer Gafchromic EBT3 films were calibrated using different radiation beams, namely photon and electron beams of Elekta Axesse medical accelerator with beam energy equal to 10 MV and 10 MeV, correspondingly, and electron beam of a betatron for intraoperative radiotherapy with beam energy equal to 6 MeV. The film pieces were irradiated by the uniform dose field in the dose range from 0.5 to 40 Gy. The dose value was controlled by cylindrical ionization chamber on Elekta Axesse accelerator and by the Markus parallel-plate ionization chamber on betatron. The irradiated films were scanned using Epson Perfection V750 Pro flatbed scanner in 16 bit RGB color mode with 150 dpi resolution. The red and green channels were used for further analysis. The central part of each film was used for calculation of average values of net optical density and its root-mean-square. As a result, the calibration curves, i.e. dependence on the reference absorbed dose measured by ionization chamber on the net optical density were constructed taking into account uncertainties of dose measurement and optical density measurement.

Results: The relative uncertainty for the dose measurement lies within 7 % for low doses (less than 1 Gy) and within 4 % for higher doses. The green channel is less sensitive to the radiation, but its relative uncertainty values are in general 1–2 % lower than the ones for the red channel. The use of different calibration sources results in different calibration curves with difference up to ± 6 % for the green channel.

Conclusion: The polymer Gafchromic EBT3 films can be used for absorbed dose measurement for the doses not less than 0.5 Gy. For lower dose values the dose measurement uncertainty caused by statistical reasons amounts 15 %. For dose values of about 1 Gy and higher the dose measurement uncertainty amounts 5 % that allows to use the films for transverse and longitudinal prescription treatment dose distribution measurement with very high spatial resolution.

Key words: radiation therapy, Gafchromic EBT3 film, clinical dosimetry, medical accelerators, absorbed dose, uncertainties

REFERENCES

  1. Syed YA, Petel-Yadav AK, Rivers C, Singh AK. Stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A review and future directions. World J Clin Oncol. 2017;8(5):389-97. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i5.389.
  2. Diot Q, Kavanagh B, Timmerman R, Miften M. Biological-based optimization and volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2012;39(1):237-45. DOI: 10.1118/1.3668059.
  3. Fiorentino A, Giaj-Levra N, Tebano U, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for brain metastases with volumetric modulated arc therapy and flattening filter free delivery: feasibility and early clinical results. Radiol Med. 2017;122(9):676-82. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0768-0.
  4. Gafchromic. Gafchromic EBT3 film specifications. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Feb. 20]. Available from: http://www.gafchromic.com/documents/EBT3_Specifications.pdf.
  5. Andreo P, Burns D, Hohlfeld K, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Technical Report Series no. 398. IAEA. 2000:251.
  6. Almond P, Biggs P, Coursey B, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med. Phys. 1999;26(9):1847-70.
  7. Sorriaux J, Kacperek A, Rossomme S, et al. Evaluation of gafchromic ebt3 films characteristics in therapy photon, electron and proton beams. Physica Medica. 2013;29.Suppl.6:599-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.10.001.
  8. Hartmann B. Martisikova M, Jakel O. Technical note: Homogeneity of Gafchromic EBT2 film. Med Phys. 2010;37.Suppl.4:1753-6. DOI: 10.1118/1.3368601.
  9. Niewald M, Fleckenstein J, Licht N, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for soft-tissue sarcomas – a retrospective evaluation of the homburg experience in the years 1995-2007. Radiat Oncol. 2009;4. Suppl.32:1-6. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-32.
  10. Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell C, Coursey B, et al. Radiochromic film dosimetry: Recommendations of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 55. Med Phys. 1998;25. Suppl.11:2093-115. DOI: 10.1118/1.598407.
  11. Devic S, Seuntjens J, Hegyi G, et al. Dosimetric properties of improved gafchromic films for seven dierent digitizers. Med Phys. 2004;31. Suppl.9:2392-401. DOI: 10.1118/1.1776691.
  12. Butson M, Yu P, Cheung T, Alnawaf H. Energy response of the new EBT2 radiochromic film to x-ray radiation. Radiat Measur. 2010;45. Suppl.7:836-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.02.016.
  13. Micke A, Lewis D, Yu X. Multichannel film dosimetry with nonuniformity correction. Med Phys. 2011;38. Suppl.5:2523-34. DOI: 10.1118/1.3576105.
  14. Devic S. Radiochromic film dosimetry: Past, present, and future. Physica Medica. 2011;27. Suppl.3:122-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.10.001.
  15. Soares C. Radiochromic film dosimetry. Radiat Measur. 2006;41. Suppl.1:S100-S116.
  16. Reinhardt S, Hillbrand M, Wilkens J, Assmann W. Comparison of gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams. Med Phys. 2012;39 Suppl.8:5257-62. DOI: 10.1118/1.4737890.
  17. Wolfram. [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019, Feb. 20]. Available from: https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica.
  18. IBA. Description of dosimetric system iba matrix. [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019, Feb. 20]. Available from: http://www.iba-dosimetry.com/complete-solutions/radiotherapy/imrt-igrt-rotational-qa/matrixxes.
  19. IBA, Description of clinical dosimeter dose-1. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2019, Feb. 20]. Available from: http://www.iba-dosimetry.com/sites/default/files/resources/RT-BR-E-DOSE1_Rev.1_0211_0.pdf.
  20. PTW, Description of dosimeter ptw unidos E. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2019, February 20]. Available from: http://www.ptw.de/unidos_e_dosemeter_ad0.html.
  21. PTW, Description of electron cionization chamber PTW23343. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2019, Feb. 20]. Available from: http://www.ptw.de/advanced_markus_electron_chamber.html.
  22. PTW, Description of solid state phantom ptw rw3 SLAP phantom T29672. [Internet] 2017. [cited 2019, February 20]. Available from: http://www.ptw.de/acrylic_and_rw3_slab_phantoms0.html.
  23. Epson, Technical characteristics of EPSON Perfection V750 scanner. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2019, Feb. 20]. Available from: http://epson.ru/catalog/scanners/epson-perfection-v750-pro/?page=characteristics.

For citation: Sukhikh ЕS, Sukhikh LG, Malikov EL, Izhevsky PV, Sheino IN, Vertinsky AV, Baulin AA. Uncertainty of Measurement Absorbed Dose by Gafchromic EBT3 Dosimeter for Clinical Electron and Photon Beams of Medical Accelerators. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(4):56–63. (English and Russian).

DOI: 10.12737/article_5d1b46c9133942.84705406

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

PDF (ENG) Full-text article (in English)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2772040
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
1767
3219
4986
25438
79783
75709
2772040

Forecast today
11856


Your IP:216.73.216.183