Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1

DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-15-19

A.K. Chigasova1, 2, 3, M.V. Pustovalova1, 4, A.A. Osipov2, S.A. Korneva5,
P.S. Eremin6, E.I. Yashkina1, 2, M.A. Ignatov1, 2,Yu.A. Fedotov1, 2,
N.Yu. Vorobyeva1, 2, A.N. Osipov1, 2

Post-Radiation Changes in The Number of Phosphorylated H2ax
and Atm Protein Foci in Low Dose X-Ray Irradiated Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells

 

1 A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

2 N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Moscow, Russia

3 Institute of Biochemical Physics, Moscow, Russia

4 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow region, Dolgoprudny, Russia

5 M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 

6 National Medical Research Center of Rehabilitation and Balneology, Moscow, Russia

Contact person: N.Yu. Vorobyeva, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

ABSTRACT

Aim: To study the patterns of changes in the number of foci of phosphorylated DNA double-strand break repair proteins H2AX (γH2AX) and ATM (pATM) in cultured human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) 1‒48 hours after exposure to X-ray radiation at doses of 40, 80, 160 and 250 mGy. 

Material and methods: We used the primary culture of human MSCs, obtained from the collection of LLC “BioloT” (Russia). Cells were irradiated using a RUB RUST-M1 X-ray biological unit (Diagnostika-M LLC, Moscow, Russia) equipped with two X-ray emitters at a dose rate of 40 mGy/min (voltage of 100 kV, an anode current of 8 mA, and a 1.5 mm Al filter) and 4 °C temperature. To quantify the yield of γH2AX and pATM foci immunocytochemical staining was carried out with the use of γH2AX and pATM antibody respectively. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the statistical software package Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft). To assess the significance of differences between samples, Student’s t-test was used.

Results: It was shown that the kinetics of changes in the number of γH2AX foci after irradiation at doses of 160 and 250 mGy and low (40‒80 mGy) doses are significantly different. In contrast to the significant (50‒60 %) decrease in the number of γH2AX foci observed
6 hours after irradiation at doses of 160 and 250 mGy, after irradiation at low doses, no significant decrease in γH2AX foci was observed at this time point. Analysis of the colocalization of γH2AX foci with pATM foci indicates that the mechanisms for maintaining a high number of γH2AX foci 24‒48 hours after low-dose irradiation are ATM independent. A hypothesis has been put forward to explain the phenomenon of maintaining the number of γH2AX foci 24‒48 hours after irradiation in low doses by replicative stress caused by stimulation of proliferation against the background of hyperproduction of free radicals, resulting in additional formation of DNA double-strand breaks and phosphorylation of H2AX by ATR kinase.

 

Keywords: mesenchymal stem cells, γH2AX, pATM, DNA double-strand breaks, X-ray radiation, low doses

 

For citation: Chigasova AK, Pustovalova MV, Osipov AA, Korneva SA, Eremin PS, Yashkina EI, Ignatov MA, Fedotov YuA, Vorobyeva NYu, Osipov AN. Post-Radiation Changes in The Number of Phosphorylated H2ax and Atm Protein Foci in Low Dose X-Ray Irradiated Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):15–19. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-15-19

 

References

1. Mastrolia I., Foppiani E.M., Murgia A., Candini O., Samarelli A.V., Grisendi G., et al. Challenges in Clinical Development of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells: Concise Review. Stem. Cells. Transl. Med. 2019;8;11:1135-1148. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0044.

2. Andrzejewska A., Lukomska B., Janowski M. Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Roots to Boost. Stem. Cells. 2019;37;7:855-864. doi: 10.1002/stem.3016.

3. Smolinska A., Bzinkowska A., Rybkowska P., Chodkowska M., Sarnowska A. Promising Markers in the Context of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Subpopulations with Unique Properties. Stem. Cells. Int. 2023;2023:1842958. doi: 10.1155/2023/1842958.

4. Zuk P.A., Zhu M., Mizuno H., Huang J., Futrell J.W., Katz A.J., et al. Multilineage Cells from Human Adipose Tissue: Implications for Cell-Based Therapies. Tissue Engineering. 2001;7;2:211-228. doi: 10.1089/107632701300062859.

5. Oswald J., Boxberger S., Jorgensen B., Feldmann S., Ehninger G., Bornhauser M., et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Can Be Differentiated into Endothelial Cells in Vitro. Stem. Cells. 2004;22;3:377-84. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-377.

6. Пустовалова М.В., Грехова А.К., Осипов А.Н. Мезенхимальные стволовые клетки: эффекты воздействия ионизирующего излучения в малых дозах // Радиационная биология. Радиоэкология. 2018. Т.58, № 4. С. 352-362. doi: 10.1134/s086980311804015x. [Pustovalova M.V., Grekhova A.K., Osipov A.N. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Effects of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Low Doses. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya = Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2018;58;4:352-362. doi: 10.1134/s086980311804015x (In Russ.)].

7. Bushmanov A., Vorobyeva N., Molodtsova D., Osipov A.N. Utilization of DNA Double-Strand Breaks for Biodosimetry of Ionizing Radiation Exposure. Environmental Advances. 2022;8. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100207.

8. Osipov A., Chigasova A., Yashkina E., Ignatov M., Fedotov Y., Molodtsova D., et al. Residual Foci of DNA Damage Response Proteins in Relation to Cellular Senescence and Autophagy in X-Ray Irradiated Fibroblasts. Cells. 2023;12;8. doi: 10.3390/cells12081209.

9. Belov O., Chigasova A., Pustovalova M., Osipov A., Eremin P., Vorobyeva N., et al. Dose-Dependent Shift in Relative Contribution of Homologous Recombination to DNA Repair after Low-LET Ionizing Radiation Exposure: Empirical Evidence and Numerical Simulation. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023;45;9:7352-73. doi: 10.3390/cimb45090465.

10. Georgoulis A., Vorgias C., Chrousos G., Rogakou E. Genome Instability and γH2AX. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18;9. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091979.

11. Burma S., Chen B.P., Murphy M., Kurimasa A., Chen D.J. ATM Phosphorylates Histone H2AX in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276;45:42462-7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100466200.

12. Stiff T., O’Driscoll M., Rief N., Iwabuchi K., Lobrich M., Jeggo P.A. ATM and DNA-PK Function Redundantly to Phosphorylate H2AX after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Cancer Res. 2004;64;7:2390-6. 

13. Zhou B.B., Elledge S.J. The DNA Damage Response: Putting Checkpoints in Perspective. Nature. 2000;408;6811:433-439. doi: 10.1038/35044005.

14. O’Driscoll M., Ruiz-Perez V.L., Woods C.G., Jeggo P.A., Goodship J.A. A Splicing Mutation Affecting Expression of Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Rad3-Related Protein (Atr) Results in Seckel Syndrome. Nature Genetics. 2003;33;4:497-501. doi: 10.1038/ng1129.

15. Reitsema T., Klokov D., Banath J.P., Olive P.L. DNA-PK Is Responsible for Enhanced Phosphorylation of Histone H2AX under Hypertonic Conditions. DNA Repair (Amst). 2005;4;10:1172-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.005.

16. Shibata A., Jeggo P.A. ATM’s Role in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Genes. 2021;12;9. doi: 10.3390/genes12091370.

17. Lee J.H., Paull T.T. Activation and Regulation of ATM Kinase Activity in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Oncogene. 2007;26;56:7741-7748. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210872.

18. Kurz E.U., Lees-Miller S.P. DNA Damage-Induced Activation of ATM and ATM-Dependent Signaling Pathways. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3;8-9:889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.029.

19. Osipov A.N., Pustovalova M., Grekhova A., Eremin P., Vorobyova N., Pulin A., et al. Low Doses of X-Rays Induce Prolonged and ATM-Independent Persistence of GammaH2AX foci in Human Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6;29:27275-87. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4739.

20. Грехова А.К., Еремин П.С., Осипов А.Н., Еремин И.И., Пустовалова М.В., Озеров И.В. и др. Замедленные процессы образования и деградации фокусов γН2ax в фибробластах кожи человека, подвергшихся воздействию рентгеновского излучения в малых дозах // Радиационная биология Радиоэкология. 2015;55(4):395-401. doi: 10.7868/s0869803115040037. [Grekhova A.K., Eremin P.S., Osipov A.N., Eremin I.I., Pustovalova M.V., Ozerov I.V., et al. Slow Processes of Formation and Degradation of γH2ax Foci in Human Skin Fibroblasts Exposed to Low-Dose X-Ray Radiation. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya = Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2015;55;4:395-401. doi: 10.7868/s0869803115040037. (In Russ.)]. 

21. Biswas H., Makinwa Y., Zou Y. Novel Cellular Functions of ATR for Therapeutic Targeting: Embryogenesis to Tumorigenesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24;14. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411684.

22. Suzuki K., Okada H., Yamauchi M., Oka Y., Kodama S., Watanabe M. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phosphorylated ATM Foci Induced by Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res. 2006;165;5:499-504. doi: 10.1667/RR3542.1.

23. Large M., Reichert S., Hehlgans S., Fournier C., Rodel C., Rodel F. A Non-Linear Detection of Phospho-Histone H2AX in EA.hy926 Endothelial Cells Following Low-Dose X-Irradiation Is Modulated by Reactive Oxygen Species. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-80.

24. Baulch J.E., Craver B.M., Tran K.K., Yu L., Chmielewski N., Allen B.D., et al. Persistent Oxidative Stress in Human Neural Stem Cells Exposed to Low Fluences of Charged Particles. Redox Biology. 2015;5:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.03.001.

25. Liang X., So Y.H., Cui J., Ma K., Xu X., Zhao Y., et al. The Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Stimulates Cell Proliferation Via Activation of the MAPK/ERK Pathway in Rat Cultured Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Journal of Radiation Research. 2011;52;3:380-386.

26. Petermann E., Helleday T. Pathways of Mammalian Replication Fork Restart. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2010;11;10:683-687. doi: 10.1038/nrm2974.

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

 

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The research was carried out with the support of the RNF (project No. 23-14-00078).

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.