JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2022. Vol. 67. № 6
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2022-67-6-79-85
I.Yu. Petrakova1, I.E. Tyurin2,3, M.F. Gubkina1,4
Visualization of the Pathology of the Chest Organs in Children
and the Possibility of Reducing Radiation Exposure
1Central Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Moscow, Russia
2N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
3Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
4N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: I.Yu. Petrakova, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
СОNTENTS
Introduction
Possibilities of alternative imaging methods without the use of ionizing radiation
Possibilities of optimizing the radiation load in diagnostic methods using ionizing radiation
Features of the organization of work during the examination of children and anesthesiological support
Conclusion
Keyworlds: children, radiation load, chest, visualization
For citation: Petrakova IYu, Tyurin IE, Gubkina MF. Visualization of the Pathology of the Chest Organs in Children and the Possibility of Reducing Radiation Exposure. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2022;67(6):79–85. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2022-67-6-79-85
References
1. Communicating Radiation Risks in Paediatric Imaging // World Health Organization. 2016. URL: http:// www.who.int/ (Date of Access: 10.05.2022).
2. Barkovskiy A.N., Akhmatdinov Ruslan R., Akhmatdinov Rustam R., et al. Radiation Doses of the Population of the Russian Federation in 2019. Information Collection. St. Petersburg Publ., 2020. 70 p. (In Russ.).
3. Brenner D., Elliston C., Hall E., Berdon W. Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:289-296. https://doi.org /10.2214/ ajr.176.2.1760289.
4. Berrington de González A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., Mettler F., et al. Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009;169;22:2071-2077. https://doi.org /10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440.
5. Hendee W.R., O’Connor MK. Radiation Risks of Medical Imaging: Separating Fact from Fantasy. Radiology 2012;264:312-321.
6. URL: http:// www.epi-ct.iarc.fr. (Date of Access: 11.05.2022).
7. Meulepas J.M., Ronckers C.M., Smets A.M.J.B., et al. Radiation Exposure from Pediatric CT Scans and Subsequent Cancer Risk in the Netherlands. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019;111;3:256-263. https://doi.org /10.1093/jnci/djy104.
8. Nikkilä A., Raitanen J., Lohi O., Auvinen A. Radiation Exposure from Computerized Tomography and Risk of Childhood Leukemia: Finnish Register-Based Case-Control Study of Childhood Leukemia (FRECCLE). Haematologica. 2018;103;11:1873-1880. https://doi.org /10.3324/haematol.2018.187716.
9. Neklyudova G.V., Naumenko Zh.K.. Ultrasound Diagnostic Opportunities in Pulmonology. Pulmonologiya = Russian Pulmonology Journal. 2017;27;2:283-290. https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2017-27-2-283-290 (In Russ.).
10. Lakhin R.Ye., Shchegolev A.V., Zhirnova Ye.A., et al. Characteristics of Ultrasound Signs in the Diagnosis of the Volume and Nature of Lung Damage. Vestnik Intensivnoy Terapii Imeni A.I. Saltanova = Annals of Critical Care. 2016;4:5–11 (In Russ.).
11. Stepanova O.A., Safina A.I. Ultrasound Diagnostics in Neonatal Intensive Care and Intensive Care Units. Vestnik Sovremennoy Klinicheskoy Meditsiny = The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine. 2014;6:92-97 (In Russ.).
12. Glagolev N.A. Complex (CT and Ultrasound) Detection of Peripheral Neoplasms of the Chest. Pulmonologiya = Russian Pulmonology Journal. 2007;5:114-120. https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2007-0-5-114-120
(In Russ.).
13. Bakhodurov D.T., Ibodov Kh.I., Rofiyev R.R., et al. Ultrasound Scanning as an Effective Way to Diagnose Exudative Pleurisy in Children. Vestnik Poslediplomnogo Obrazovaniya v Sfere Zdravookhraneniya = Scientific and Practical Journal of Tajik Institute of Post-Graduate Education of Medical Staff. 2015;2:18-21 (In Russ.).
14. Bakhodurov D.T., Ibodov Kh.I., Rofiyev R.R., et al. The Possibilities of Ultrasound Imaging in Complex Diagnostics of Neonatal Lung Diseases. Trudnyy Patsiyent = Difficult Patient. 2017;15;8-9:32-39 (In Russ.).
15. Petrikov S.S., Popugayev K.A., Khamidova L.T., et al. First Experience of Lung Ultrasound Application in Patients with Acute Viral Infection Caused by SARS-CoV-2. Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya = Medical Visualization. 2020;24;2:50-62. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2020-2-50-62 (In Russ.).
16. Strokova L.A., Yegorov Ye.Yu. Experience in Conducting Lung Ultrasound in Community-Acquired Pneumonia COVID-19. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2020;11;2:99-106. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-2-99-106 (In Russ.).
17. Denina M., Scolfaro C., Silvestro E., et al. Lung Ultrasound in Children With COVID-19. Pediatrics. 2020;146;1: e20201157. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1157.
18. Chuyashenko Ye.V., Zavadovskaya V.D., Ageyeva T.S., et al. Lung Ultrasonography in Pneumonia. Sibirskiy Zhurnal Klinicheskoy i Eksperimentalnoy Meditsiny = The Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019;34;1:78-84. https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1-78-84 (In Russ.).
19. Yan C., Hui R., Lijuan Z., Zhou Y. Lung Ultrasound vs. Chest X-Ray in Children with Suspected Pneumonia Confirmed by Chest Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020;19;2:1363-1369. https://doi.org /10.3892/etm.2019.8333.
20. Safonov D.V., Dianova T.I., Rodionov V.A., Gerasimova L.A. X-Ray-Ultrasound Comparisons and Dynamic Echographic Control in Pneumonia in Children. Nauchnyy Zhurnal KubGAU = Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2014;104:1591-1605 (In Russ.).
21. Tukhbatullin M.G., Valiyev R.Sh., Shamshurova Ye.S.. X-ray Ultrasound Picture in Infiltrative Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Prakticheskaya Meditsina = Practical Medicine. 2014;3:139-142. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rentgeno-ultrazvukovaya-kartina-pri-infiltrativnom-tuberkuleze (In Russ.).
22. Gulla K.M., Gunathilaka G., Jat K.R., Sankar J., Karan M., Lodha R., Kabra S.K. Utility and Safety of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound with an Echobronchoscope-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Children with Mediastinal Pathology. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54;6:881-885. https://doi.org /10.1002/ppul.24313.
23. Gilbert C.R., Chen A., Akulian J.A., Lee H.J., Wahidi M., Argento A.C., Tanner N.T., Pastis N.J., Harris K., Sterman D., Toth J.W., Chenna P.R., Feller-Kopman D., Yarmus L. The Use of Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in a Pediatric Population: a Multicenter Study. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2014;49;8:807-815. https://doi.org /10.1002/ppul.22887.
24. Filatova T.I. Informativeness of Computer and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Enterogenic Mediastinal Cysts. Byulleten Meditsinskikh Internet-Konferentsiy = Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2013;2. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/informativnost-kompyuternoy-i-magnitno-rezonansnoy-tomografii-v-diagnostike-enterogennyh-kist-sredosteniya (Date of Access: 12.05.2022) (In Russ.).
25. Kotlyarov P.M., Lagkuyeva I.D., Sergeyev N.I., Solodkiy V.A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnostics of Lung Diseases. Pulmonologiya = Russian Pulmonology Journal. 2018;28;2:217–223. https://doi.org /10.18093/0869-0189-2018-28-2-217-223 (in Russ.).
26. Kotlyarov P.M., Lagkuyeva I.D., Sergeyev N.I., et al. The Technique of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Dynamic Contrast Enhancement with Focal Benign Lung Formation. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2018;3:69-74. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-9-3-69-74 (In Russ.).
27. Akhadov T.A., Guryakov S.YU., Ublinskiy M.V. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Study of Lungs. Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya = Medical Visualization. 2019;4:10-23. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-4-10-23 (In Russ.).
28. Stashuk G.A., Dubrova S.E., Adel Salem Ali Numan. Differential Diagnosis of Intrathoracic Lymph Node Lesions in Lymphomas. Vestnik Rentgenologii i Radiologii = Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2008;4–6:16–24 (In Russ.).
29. Abdel Razek A.A., Elkammary S., Elmorsy A.S., Elshafey M., Elhadedy T. Characterization of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2011;29;2:167–172. https://doi.org 10.1016/j.mri.2010.08.002.
30. Sudarkina A.V., Dergilev A.P., Kozlov V.V., et al. Differential Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy in Lymphoma and Sarcoidosis Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2020;11;3:56-62. https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-3-56-62 (In Russ.).
31. Lesnyak V.N., Zhuravleva V.A., Averyanov A.V. The Capabilities of MRI in the Lung Lesions Diagnosis in Patients with COVID-19. Klinicheskaya Praktika = Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;11;2:51–59. https://doi.org 10.17816/ clinpract34843 (In Russ.).
32. Wielpütz M.O., Puderbach M., Kopp-Schneider A., Stahl M., Fritzsching E., Sommerburg O., Ley S., Sumkauskaite M., Biederer J., Kauczor H.U., Eichinger M., Mall M.A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Changes in Structure and Perfusion, and Response to Therapy in Early Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;189;8:956-965. https://doi.org/ 10.1164/rccm.201309-1659OC.
33. Pennati F., Roach D.J., Clancy J.P., et al. Assessment of Pulmonary Structure-Function Relationships in Young Children and Adolescents with Cystic Fibrosis by Multivolume Proton-MRI and CT. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging.. 2018;48;2:531-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25978.
34. Ciet P., Tiddens H.A., Wielopolski P.A., et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children: Common Problems and Possible Solutions for Lung and Airways Imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45;13:1901-1915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3420-y.
35. Roach D.J., Crémillieux Y., Fleck R.J., Brody A.S., Serai S.D., Szczesniak R.D., Kerlakian S., Clancy J.P., Woods J.C. Ultrashort Echo-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Sensitive Method for the Evaluation of Early Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016;13;11:1923-1931. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-203OC.
36. Miroshnichenko S.I., Kovalenko Yu.N., Chernetsov V.B. Replacement of Fluorography with Screening Digital Radiography. Poliklinika. 2016;6:19-22 (in Russ).
37. Nikitin M.M. The Possibilities of Digital Tomosynthesis in the Diagnosis of Various Forms of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Rossiyskiy Elektronnyy Zhurnal Luchevoy Diagnostiki = Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2016;6;1:35–47. https://doi.org/10.18411/a-2016-004 (In Russ.).
38. Kruamak T., Edwards R., Cheng S., et al. Accuracy of Digital Tomosynthesis of the Chest in Detection of Interstitial Lung Disease Comparison with Digital Chest Radiography. Comparative Study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2019;43;1:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000780.
39. Kim J.H., Lee K.H., Kim K.T., et al. Comparison of Digital Tomosynthesis and Chest Radiography for the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Radiol. 2016;89;1068:20160421. https://doi.org/ 10.1259/bjr.20160421.
40. Simonovskaya Kh.Yu., Zaytseva O.V., Sholokhova N.A. Opportunities for Solving Relevant Diagnostic Problems in Pediatrics with the Use of Digital Chest Tomosynthesis. Pediatriya. Zhurnal im. G.N. Speranskogo = Pediatrics Journal Named After G.N. SPERANSKY. 2020;99;2:112-117 (In Russ.).
41. Matkevich Ye.I., Sinitsyn V.Ye., Ivanov I.V. Napravleniya Optimizatsii Luchevoy Nagruzki pri Kompyuternoy Tomografii = Directions of Optimization of Radiation Load in Computed Tomography. Scientific and Practical Guide. Moscow-Voronezh, Elist Publ., 2018. 200 p.
42. Aschoff A.J., Catalano C., Kirchin M.A., Krix M., Albrecht T. Low Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography: the Role of Iodine. Br. J. Radiol. 2017;90;1076:20170079. https://doi.org/ 10.1259/bjr.20170079.
43. Strauss K.J., Goske M.J., Kaste S.C., Bulas D., Frush D.P., Butler P., et al. Image Gently: Ten Steps You Can Take to Optimize Image Quality and Lower CT Dose for Pediatric Patients. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;194;4:868–873. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4091.
44. Silin A.Yu., Gruzdev I.S., Morozov S.P. The Influence of Model Iterative Reconstruction on the Image Quality in Standard and Low-Dose Computer Tomography of the Chest. Experimental Study. Klinicheskaya Praktika = Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;11;4:49–54. doi: 10.17816/clinpract34900) (In Russ.).
45. Ichikawa Y., Kitagawa K., Nagasawa N., Murashima S., Sakuma H. CT of the Chest with Model-Based, Fully Iterative Reconstruction: Comparison with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction. BMC Med. Imaging. 2013;13:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-27.
46. den Harder A.M., Willemink M.J., Budde R.P., Schilham A.M., Leiner T., de Jong P.A. Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Techniques for Pediatric CT. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2015;204;3:645-53. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12590.
47. Rampinelli C., Origgi D., Vecchi V., Funicelli L., Raimondi S., Deak P., Bellomi M. Ultra-Low-Dose CT with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR): Detection of Ground-Glass Nodules in an Anthropomorphic Phantom Study. Radiol. Med. 2015;120;7:611-617. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11547-015-0505-5.
48. Nakajo C., Heinzer S., Montandon S., Dunet V., Bize P., Feldman A., Beigelman-Aubry C. Chest CT at a Dose Below 0.3 mSv: Impact of Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality and Lung Analysis. Acta. Radiol. 2016;57;3:311-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185115578469.
49. Padole A., Singh S., Ackman J.B., Wu C., Do S., Pourjabbar S., Khawaja R.D., Otrakji A., Digumarthy S., Shepard J.A., Kalra M. Submillisievert Chest CT with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014;203;4:772-781. https://doi.org /10.2214/AJR.13.12312.
50. Sun J., Zhang Q., Hu D., et al. Feasibility Study of Using One-Tenth mSv Radiation Dose in Young Children Chest CT with 80 kVp and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:12481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48946-z.
51. Villanueva-Meyer J.E., Naeger D.M., Courtier J.L., et al. Pediatric Chest CT at Chest Radiograph Doses: When Is the Ultralow-Dose Chest CT Clinically Appropriate? Emerg. Radiol. 2017;24;4:369-376. https://doi.org /10.1007/s10140-017-1487-5.
52. Kiratli P.Ö., Tuncel M., Bar-Sever Z. Nuclear Medicine in Pediatric and Adolescent Tumors. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2016;46;4:308-323. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.004.
53. Malherbe S.T., Shenai S., Ronacher K., Loxton A.G., Dolganov G., Kriel M., et al. Persisting Positron Emission Tomography Lesion Activity and Mycobacterium Tuberculosis mRNA after Tuberculosis Cure. Nat. Med. 2016;22;10:1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4177.
54. Chipiga L.A., Zvonova I.A., Ryzhkova D.V., et al. Levels of Patient Exposure and a Potential for Optimization of the Pet Diagnostics in the Russian Federation. Radiatsionnaya Gigiyena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10;4:31-43. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-4-31-43 (In Russ.).
55. Petryaykin A.V., Razumovskiy A.Yu., Ublinskiy M.V., et al. Multispiral Computed Tomography with Contrast Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Surgical Diseases of the Thoracic Cavity in Children. Detskaya Khirurgiya = Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2013;4:9-15 (In Russ.).
56. Khasanova K.A., Tyurin I.E., Ryzhov S.A., Kizhayev Ye.V. Radiation Dose Reduction in Pediatric Computed Tomography. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64;1:38-44. https://doi.org /10.12737/article_5c55fb466d7532.24221014 (In Russ.).
57. Stranzinger E., Schindera S., Cullmann J., Herrmann R., Schmitz S., Wolf R. Pediatric CT of the Lung: Influences on Image Quality. Open Journal of Radiology. 2013;3;1:45-50. https://doi.org /10.4236/ojrad.2013.31007.
58. Schulte-Uentrop L., Goepfert M.S. Anaesthesia or Sedation for MRI in Children. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2010;23;4:513–517.
59. Serafini G., Zadra N. Anaesthesia for MRI in the Paediatric Patient . Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2008;21;4:499–503.
60. Panteleyeva M.V., Ovezov A.M., Kotov A.S., et al. Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Children (Literature Review). RMZH (Russkiy Meditsinskiy Zhurnal). 2018;9:52–56 (In Russ.).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.07.2022. Accepted for publication: 25.09.2022.