JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017. Vol. 62. No. 6. P. 51-57

NUCLEAR MEDICINE

DOI: 10.12737/article_5a2541849d5335.59531206

Effect of Correction of Gamma-Radiation Absorption in the Study of Myocardial Perfusion by SPECT/CT

E.A. Khachirova1, L.E. Samoylenko2, O.P. Shevchenko1

1. N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia

E.A. Khachirova – assistant; L.E. Samoylenko – Dr. Sc. Med., Prof.; O.P. Shevchenko – Dr. Sc. Med., Prof., Head the Department, Member of the European Society of Cardiology

Abstract

Purpose: Assessment of the impact of absorption correction (AC) on quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion and determination of the extent of stress-induced myocardial microcirculation disorders on SPECT/CT in patients with chest pain and unchanged coronary arteries.

Material and methods: the study included 35 patients, each of whom was carried a selective coronary angiography and rest/stress SPECT/CT of the myocardium with 99mTc -MIBI with- and without AC.

Results: In all patients with stress-induced myocardial ischemia was detected both without and with AC images. However, quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion were lower after the AC: SSS 6.9 ± 1.2 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1; SDS 4.0 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 0.6; Stress ext. Total 11.2 ± 1.8 vs. 13.0 ± 1.9; Stress TPD total 9.3 ± 1.2 vs.10.9 ± 1.2; TPDi 4.1 ± 1.0 vs.5.9 ± 0.9 (for all p < 0.05). For SRS, Rest ext. Total, and Rest TPD total difference was not significant. The number of hypoperfused segments, according to the segmental analysis, was less after AC and was 126 vs. 153 at rest, 242 vs. 177 under stress. In women, significant difference was obtained for all parameters, for men – only for the SSS, SDS, Stress ext. Total, Stress TPD total. In patients with BMI ≥25 significant difference for all parameters was obtained. However, patients with the normal BMI (18,5–24,9; WHO, 2004) significant difference was obtained only for Stress ext. Total, Stress TPD total.

Conclusion: The use of SPECT/CT with AC allow to detect microcirculatory violations of perfusion and myocardial reserve perfusion in patients with pain in the chest with the unchanged AC, as evidenced by indicators of the average values of quantitative parameters of perfusion scintigram. The most significant impact on the quantitative perfusion parameters was observed in women with well-developed breasts and obese patients. The findings give reason to assume the use of AC to avoid revaluation incidence and severity of stress-induced myocardial perfusion disturbances.

Key words: SPECT/CT, gamma-ray emission, absorption correction, microvascular angina, myocardial perfusion

REFERENCES

  1. Sciagra R., Leoncini M. Gated single-photon emission computed tomography. The present-day ‹›one-stop-shop›› for cardiac imaging. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2005. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 19–29.
  2. Beyer T., Townsend D.W., Blodgett T.M. Dualmodality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. J. Nucl. Med. 2002. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 24–34.
  3. Friedman T.D., Greene A.C., Iskandrian A.S. et al. Exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy in women: correlation with coronary arteriography. Amer. J. Cardiol. 1982. Vol. 49. P. 1632–1637.
  4. Gaemperli O., Schepis T., Kalff V., Namdar M. et al. Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2007. Vol. 34. No. 7. P. 1097–1106.
  5. Schillaci O. Hybrid SPECT/CT: a new era for SPECT imaging?. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2005. Vol. 32. No. 5. P. 521– 524.
  6. Gaemperli O., Saraste A., Knuuti J. Cardiac hybrid imagine. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 51–60.
  7. Hendel R., Corbett J., Cullom S. et al. The value and practice of attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: a joint position statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2002. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 135–143.
  8. Dvorak R.A., Brown R.K., Corbett J.R. Interpretation of SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion images: common artifacts and quality control techniques. Radiographics. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 7. P. 2041–2057.
  9. Solomyanyy V., Sergienko V. Quantitative evaluation with attenuation correction improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenosis: a comparative study with fractional flow reserve 23 measurements. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2013. Vol. 40. No. 2. Supplement. P. 546–550.
  10. Apostolopoulos D. J., Savvopoulos C. What is the benefit of CT-based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPET?. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2016. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 89–92.
  11. Prasad M., Slomka P.J., Fish M. et al. Improved quantification and normal limits for myocardial perfusion stress-rest change. J. Nucl. Med. 2010. Vol. 51. P. 204–209.
  12. Genovesi D., Giorgetti A. Impact of attenuation correction and gated acquisition in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the multicentre SPAG (SPECT Attenuation Correction vs Gated) study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2011. Vol. 38. No. 10. P. 1890–1898.
  13. Shawgi M., Tonge C. et al. Attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPET in patients of normal body mass index. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2012. 15. No. 3. P. 2015–2019.
  14. Karpova I.E., Samoylenko L.E., Soboleva G.N. et al. Primeneniye odnofotonnoy emissionnoy kompyuternoy tomografii s 99mTc-MIBI v sochetanii s farmakologicheskoy proboy s adenozintrifosfatom natriya v diagnostike ishemii miokarda u bolnykh s mikrovaskulyarnoy stenokardiyey. Kardiologiya. 2014. No. 7. P. 4–8. (In Russ.).
  15. Khachirova E.A., Samoylenko L.E., Shevchenko O.P., Karpova I.E. Otsenka perfuzii miokarda u patsiyentov s bolevym sindromom v grudnoy kletke i angiograficheski neizmenennymi koronarnymi arteriyami. po dannym odnofotonnoy emissionnoy kompyuternoy tomografii. sovmeshchennoy s rentgenovskoy kompyuternoy tomografiyey. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika . 2016. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 58–63. (In Russ.).
  16. Massoud T., Gambhir S. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes. Dev. 2003. Vol. 17. No. 5. P. 545–580.
  17. Goodgold H.M., Render J.G., Samuels L.D. et al. Improved interpretation of exercise Tl-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in women: characterization of breast attenuation artifacts. Radiology. Vol. 165. P. 361–366.
  18. Desmarias R., Kaul, S., Watson D. et al. Do false positive thallium-201 scans lead to unnecessary catheterization? Outcome of patients with perfusion defects on quantitative planar thallium scintigraphy. J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol. 1993. Vol. 21. P. 1058–1063.
  19. Holly T.A., Parker M.A., Hendel R.C. The prevalence of non-uniform soft tissue attenuation in myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging and the impact of gated SPECT. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 1997. Vol. 4. P. S103 (abstract).
  20. Namdar M., Hany T.F., Koepfli P. et al. Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol. 46. P. 930–935.
  21. Corbett J. R., Ficaro E.P. Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 54–68.
  22. Nelson M.D., Szczepaniak L.S., Wei J. et al. Diastolic dysfunction in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease a hypothesis-generating study. Circ. Imaging. 2014. Vol. 7. P. 510–516.

For citation: Khachirova EA, Samoylenko LE, Shevchenko OP. Effect of Correction of Gamma-Radiation Absorption in the Study of Myocardial Perfusion by SPECT/CT. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017;62(6):51–7. Russifn. DOI: 10.12737/article_5a2541849d5335.59531206

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2760167
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
2364
3035
18551
18409
67910
75709
2760167

Forecast today
2424


Your IP:216.73.216.40