JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2016. Vol. 61. No. 6. P. 50-56

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY

E.I. Matkevich1,2, V.E. Sinitsyn1, A.N. Bashkov3

Comparison of Radiation Dose of Patients During Single-Phase and Multiphase Computed Tomography in the Multidisciplinary Treatment Clinic

1. Federal Center of Treatment and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow. Russia; 3. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Determine mean radiation dose of patients and comparison of frequency of CT-examinations and radiation dose of patients during single-phase and multiphase CT-examinations of the brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis and feasibility of low-dose CT-examinations.

Material and methods: Structure of single-phase and multiphase CT-examinations, were analyzed during 2012-2014 in a multiprofile hospital (450 beds). The mean effective dose in single-phase and multiphase CT-examinations were calculated, data were obtained from 1766 records of patients (age range 17-93) scanned with 4 MDCT systems for the years 2012-2014: brain (n = 369), chest (n = 661), abdomen-pelvis (n = 557), chest-abdomen-pelvis (n = 179). CT-examinations of good quality were selected, volumetric CT dose index (CTDI, mGy) and dose-length product (DLP, mGy×cm) were collected for each of them. The effective dose (mSv) was calculated using the normalized coefficients according to Guidelines [7].

Results: Most of single-phase CT is the examination of chest (27.9-33.1 %), as for multiphase CT it is the examinations of abdomen and pelvis (18.9-25.2%). The mean effective doses due to one multiphase CT according to anatomical areas were as follows: brain - 3.2-4.6 mSv, chest - 8.4-5.3 mSv, chest-abdomen-pelvis - 31.8-38.6 mSv. Reduction of radiation dose was presented in illustrated routine examples of low-dose CT, for single-phase CT of chest to 2.6-3.7 times, for multiphase CT of chest-abdomen-pelvis to 3.6-6.4 times.

Conclusion: Radiation doses of one multiphase CT increase in proportion to the number of phases. Dose levels for one phase at a multiphase CT are generally lower than radiation doses in similar single-phase CT. Using low-dose methods in single-phase CT and in the native phase of multiphase CT allows to reduce radiation dose to patients preserving the acceptable quality of CT-imaging.

Key words : computed tomography, multiphase computed tomography, patients, effective radiation dose of patients, low-dose CT-examinations, low doses, potential risk, risk assessment

REFERENCES

  1. Morin R.L., Seibert J.A., Boone J.M. Radiation dose and safety: informatics standards and tools. J. Amer. Coll. 2014. Vol. 11. No. 12. Pt. B., P. 1286-1297. (In Russ.).
  2. Ivanov I.V. Kriterial'nye pokazateli vozdeistviya ioniziruyushchikh izluchenii v subletal'nykh i letal'nykh dozakh. Metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: RMAPO. 2005. 56 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Ivanov I.V. Iskhodnaya reaktivnost' organizma i radiatsionnye vozdeistviya v malykh dozakh. Nauchno-metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. Moscow: RMAPO. 2010. 272 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Smith-Bindman R. Environmental causes of breast cancer and radiation from medical imaging: findings from the Institute of Medicine report. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012. Vol. 172. No. 13. P. 1023-1027. (In Russ.).
  5. O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2011 godu. Gosudarstvennyi doklad Rospotrebnadzora. Moscow: Federal'nyi tsentr gigieny i epidemiologii Rospotrebnadzora. 2012. (In Russ.).
  6. O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2014 godu. Gosudarstvennyi doklad. Moscow: Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelei i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2015. P. 56-65. (In Russ.).
  7. MU 2.6.1.2944-11. 2.6.1. Kontrol' effektivnykh doz oblucheniya patsientov pri provedenii meditsinskikh rentgenologicheskikh issledovanii. Metodicheskie ukazaniya. 2011. (In Russ.).
  8. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for CT: EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 1999. Available at: http://w3.tue.nl/fileadmin/sbd/Documenten/Leergang/BSM/European_Guidelines_Quality_Criteria_Computed_Tomography_Eur_16252.pdf.
  9. Hayton A., Wallace A., Marks P. et al. Australian diagnostic reference levels for multi detector computed tomography. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 2013. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 19-26.
  10. Van der Molen A.J., Schilham A., Stoop P. et al. National survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 383-390.
  11. Tsapaki V., Aldrich J.E., Sharma R. et al. Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT-IAEA-coordinated research project. Radiology. Vol. 240. No. 3. P. 828-834.
  12. Smith-Bindman R., Lipson J., Marcus R. et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch. Med. 2009. Vol. 169. No. 22. P. 2078-2086.
  13. Luke F.E., Allen B.C., Moshiri S.T. et al. Multiphase multi-detector row computed tomography in the setting of chronic liver disease and orthotopic liver transplantation: can a series be eliminated in order to reduce radiation dose?. J. Comput. Tomogr. 2013. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 408-414.
  14. Radiological Protection for Medical Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Safety Guide. IAEA safety Standartm Series No. RS-G-1.5. Vienna, Austria: IAEA. 2002.
  15. MR6.1.0066-12. Primenenie referensnykh diagnosticheskikh urovnei dlya optimizatsii radiatsionnoi zashchity patsienta v rentgenologicheskikh issledovaniyakh obshchego naznacheniya. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. 2012. (In Russ.).
  16. Goldschmidt F., De Gelder P., Beraha D. An approach to knowledge management for EUROSAFE projects. EUROSAFE 2005 Safety Improvements - Reasons, Strategies, Implementation. Brussels. Sem. 2.
  17. Guite K.M., Hinshaw J.L., Ranallo F.N. et al. Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT: unindicated multiphase scans are an important source of medically unnecessary exposure. J. Amer. Coll Radiol. 2011. Vol. 11. P. 756-761.

For citation: Matkevich FI, Sinitsyn VE, Bashkov A.N. Comparison of Radiation Dose of Patients During Single-phase and Multiphase Computed Tomography in the Multidisciplinary Treatment Clinic. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2016;61(6):50-6. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2760484
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
849
2366
18868
18409
68227
75709
2760484

Forecast today
11808


Your IP:216.73.216.72