Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 6

DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-129-135

Yu.D. Udalov1, A.A. Sazhina1, A.A. Timchenko2, V.I. Pustovoit1

Modern Visualisaion Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions

1 A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

² Tinkoff Development Center, Moscow, Russia

Contact person: Anna Sazhina , e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize current approaches to the diagnosis of renal masses with a focus on the multimodal imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.

Material and methods: A structured literature review was conducted covering Russian and international sources published between 2015 and 2024. Diagnostic methods included ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion CT, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Special attention was given to radiomics, machine learning algorithms (CNN, SVM, XGBoost), and the integration of augmented/virtual reality tools in oncological urology.

Results: CT and MRI demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity up to 95 %), while AI-based models such as KidneyNet and 3D RES-UNET achieve >96 % accuracy in tumor segmentation and classification. Radiomics and texture analysis support histological subtype differentiation, tumor grading prediction, and reduction of diagnostic subjectivity. AR/VR technologies enhance preoperative planning and personalized clinical decision-making.

Conclusions: The integration of AI technologies with multimodal imaging improves diagnostic precision, facilitates clinical workflows, and promotes the development of personalized oncological urology. Standardization of data acquisition protocols, external validation of algorithms, and resolution of ethical issues related to patient data use remain essential for large-scale implementation.

Keywords:radiation diagnostics, multimodal imaging, renal masses, artificial intelligence, radiomics, texture analysis, KidneyNet

For citation: Udalov YuD, Sazhina AA, Timchenko AA, Pustovoit VI. Modern Visualisaion Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(6):129–135. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-129-135

 

References

1. Instruktivno-Metodicheskiye Ukazaniya po Ispol’zovaniyu Polnogo Perechnya Kodov Morfologii Opukholey (MKB-O) i ikh Perevodu v Kody Yedinoy Sistemy Populyatsionnykh Rakovykh Registrov Rossii = Instructional and Methodological Guidelines for the Use of the Complete List of Tumor Morphology Codes (ICD-O) and their Translation into Codes of the Unified System of Population-Based Cancer Registries of Russia. Ed. O.F.Chepik, V.M.Merabishvili. St. Petersburg Publ., 1996. 31 p. (In Russ.)

2. Mezhdunarodnaya Statisticheskaya Klassifikatsiya Bolezney i Problem, Svyazannykh so Zdorov’yem = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva, World Health Organization Publ., 1995. 698 p. (In Russ.).

3. Spravochnik Sopostavleniya Kodov MKB-9 i MKB-10 Peresmotrov po Klassu Novoobrazovaniy = Handbook of Comparison of ICD-9 and ICD-10 Revision Codes by Neoplasm Class. Ed. V.M.Merabishvili. St. Petersburg Publ., 1998. 91 p. (In Russ.).

4. WHO Report of 01.02.2024 (In Russ.). URL: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2024/02/1449057

5. Zlokachestvennyye Novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2022 Godu (Zabolevayemost’ i Smertnost’) = Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (Incidence and Mortality). P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (In Russ.). URL: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/zis-2022-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf.

6. Merabishvili V.M., Poltoratskiy A.N., Nosov A.K., et al. The State of Oncological Care in Russia. Kidney Cancer (Incidence, Mortality, Reliability of Accounting, One-Year and Year-Long Mortality, Histological Structure). Part 1. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology. 2021;17;2:182-194 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-182-194. EDN YWWJJW.

7. Kadyrleyev R.A., Bagnenko S.S., Bus’ko Ye.A., et al. Multiparametric Ultrasound Examination with Contrast Enhancement of Solid Renal Formations in Comparison with the Computed Tomography Method. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2021;12;4:74–82 (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2021-12-4-74-82.

8. Elstob A., Gonsalves M., Patel U. Diagnostic Modalities. International Journalof Surgery. 2016;36;Pt. C:504–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.005 .Epub 2016 Jun 15.

9. Yamshchikov O.N., Yemel’yanova N.V., Zagorodnova D.S. Modern Methods of Radiation Diagnostics of Kidney Neoplasms (Literature Review). Meditsina i Fizicheskaya Kul’tura: Nauka i Praktika = Medicine and Physical Education: Science and Practice. 2021;3;1:14-22
(In Russ.). doi: 10.20310/2658-7688-2021-3-1(9)-14-22. EDN NFDUUK. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45428143

10. Kadyrleyev R.A., Bus’ko Ye.A., Kostromina Ye.V., et al. Ultrasound Examination with Contrast in the Algorithm for Diagnosing Solid Renal Formations. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2021;12;1:14–23 (In Russ.). doi: 22328/2079-5343-2020-12-1-14-23. EDN TDGSSC.

11. Shehata M., Abouelkheir R.T., Gayhart M., Van Bogaert E., Abou El-Ghar M., Dwyer A.C., Ouseph R., Yousaf J., Ghazal M., Contractor S., El-Baz A. Role of Ai and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome prediction: a Brief Review. Cancers. 2023;15;10:28-35. doi:10.3390/cancers15102835.

12. Lomonosova Ye.V., Gol’bits A.B., Rubtsova N.A., Alekseyev B.YA., Kaprin A.D. Perfusion Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Kidney Diseases (Literature Review). Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya = Medical Visualization. 2023;27;2:85–98 (In Russ.). doi: 10.24835/1607-0763-1220.

13. Haralick R.M., Shanmugam K., Dinstein I. Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. SMC. 1973;3;6:610–21. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314.

14. Gorduladze D.N., Sirota Ye.S., Rapoport L.M., et al. Possibilities of Texture Analysis of Radiation Imaging Methods in the Diagnosis of Renal Parenchyma Formations. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology. 2021;17;4:129–35 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-4-129-135.

15. Mosoyan M.S., Gilev Ye.S., Aysina N.A. Dobrokachestvennyye Obrazovaniya Pochek = Benign Kidney Tumors. Textbook Manual. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskiy Gosudarstvennyy Ekonomicheskiy Universitet Publ., 2022. 27 p. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2023-14-4-7-18.

16. Reva S.A., Shaderkin I.A., Zyatchin I.V., Petrov S.B. Artificial Intelligence in Oncourology. Eksperimental’naya i Klinicheskaya Urologiya = Experimental & Clinical Urology. 2021;14;2:46-51 (In Russ.). doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-46-51.

17. Yu H.S., Scalera J., Khalid M., Touret A.S., Bloch N., Li B., et al. Texture Analysis as a Radiomic Marker for Differentiating Renal Tumors. Abdominal Radiology. 2017;42;10:2470-2478. doi:10.1007/ s00261-017-1144-1.

18. Yan L., Liu Z., Wang G., Huang Y., Liu Y., Yu Y., et al. Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma by Texture Analysis on CT Images. Academic Radiology. 2015;22;9:1115-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.04.004.

19. Feng Z., Rong P., Cao P., Zhou Q., Zhu W., Yan Z., et al. Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Texture Analysis of CT Images of Small Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma. Euro Radiol. 2018;28;4:1625-1633. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5118-z.

20. Zholdubayev A.A., Glybochko P.V., Alyayev Yu.G., et al. Automated System for Supporting Medical Decision-Making in the Treatment of Patients with Renal Parenchyma Neoplasms - the First Experience of using the Sechenov.AI_Nephro web Platform - Results of Multicenter Testing. Urologiya = Urology. 2024;5:12-22 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/urology.2024.5.12-22. EDN RQKKFX. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=74502433.

21. Almuayqil S.N., Abd El-Ghany S., Abd El-Aziz A.A., Elmogy M. KidneyNet: A Novel CNN-Based Technique for the Automated Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Diseases from CT. Scans. Electronics. 2024;13:4981. doi: 10.3390/electronics13244981

22. Ivanova E., Fayzullin A., Grinin V., Ermilov D., Arutyunyan A., Timashev P., Shekhter, A. Empowering Renal Cancer Management with AI and Digital Pathology. Pathology, Diagnostics and Prognosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2875. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112875.

23. Karel’skaya N.A., Gruzdev I.S., Raguzina V.Yu., Karmazanovskiy G.G. Texture Analysis of CT and MR Images in the Differential Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Review. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2023;14;4:7–18 (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2023-14-4-7-18.

24. Chen S., Song D., Chen L., Guo T., Jiang B., Liu A., Pan X., Wang T., Tang H., Chen G., Xue Z., Wang X., Zhang N., Zheng J. Artificial Intelligence-Based on-Invasive Tumor Segmentation, Grades Tratific Ationand Prognosis Prediction for Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Precision. Clinical Medicine. 2023;6;3:19. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad019. URL: https://academic.oup.com/pcm/article-pdf/6/3/pbad019/51300618/pbad019.pdf.

25. Liu J., Yildirim O., Akin O., Tian Y. AI-Driven Robust Kidney and Renal Mass Segmentation and Classification on 3D CT Images. Bioengineering. 2023;10:116. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010116

26. Pustovgar A.A., Yarosh A.L., Oleynik N.V., Soloshenko A.V. First Results of Using the Developed Robotic Device for Adrenal Biopsy under Computed Tomography Control. Sovremennyye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2024;3;4:4-13 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17513/spno.3353. EDNFMTGTH.

27. Timofeyeva Ye.Yu., Azil’gareyeva K.R., Morozov A.O., Taratkin M.S., Yenikeyev D.V. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics, Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Kidney Cancer. Vestnik Urologii = Urology Herald. 2023;11;3:142–148 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-142-148. EDN TDGSSC. 

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

 

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.07.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.08.2025.