Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2026. Vol. 71. № 2

DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2026-71-2-40-47

K.V. Briks, T.V. Azizova, E.S. Grigoryeva, M.V. Bannikova

Risk of Angina Pectoris in a Cohort of Nuclear Workers

Southern Urals Federal Research and Clinical Center for Medical Biophysics, 456783, Ozyorsk, Russia

Contact person: K.V. Briks, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To assess the incidence risk of angina pectoris (ICD-10 code: I20) in a cohort of workers who had chronic occupational exposure taking into account non-radiation factors: sex, age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), arterial hypertension (AH), diabetes mellitus (DM).

Material and methods: The study cohort included 22,377 workers of the nuclear energy enterprise ‒ the Mayak Production Association (PA) ‒ who had been hired during 1948‒1982 and followed up until the end of 2018. The vital status at the end of the follow-up period is known for 95 % of the cohort members, of whom 67.2 % died, .and 32 % are alive. The presented study utilizes the MWDS-2013 (Mayak Worker Dosimetry System-2013) individual dose estimates of external and internal exposure. Mean cumulative liver absorbed dose of external gamma-exposure was 0.45 (0.65) Gy ‒ in males (mean(standard deviation)) and 0.37 (0.56) Gy ‒ in females. Mean cumulative dose of internal alpha-exposure to the liver made up 0.18 (0.65) Gy and 0.40 (1.92) Gy, respectively. The analysis included the calculation of relative risks (RR) and excess relative risk per unit dose (ERR/Gy) with the Poisson regression using the AMFIT module of the EPICURE statistical software package. Excess relative risk (ERR), i.e. the relative risk minus one, was described with the help of the linear dependence on the external dose adjusted for non-radiation factors (via stratification) and internal dose, as well as on the internal dose adjusted for the non-radiation factors and external dose. 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance (p-values) were calculated with maximum likelihood methods. All the criteria of statistical significance were two-sided. The differences were considered statistically significant at
p < 0.05.

Results: A statistically significant linear dependence of the angina pectoris incidence on the cumulative liver absorbed dose of external gamma-exposure once adjusted for non-radiation factors (sex, attained age, calendar period, smoking status, alcohol consumption) and internal alpha-exposure dose has been established both for males and females.

Conclusion: This is the first study of the angina pectoris incidence risk in the cohort of workers who had chronic occupational exposure that brings forward evidence of the relationship with the ionizing radiation. 

Keywords: chronic occupational radiation exposure, Mayak PA, angina pertoris, external exposure to gamma radiation, internal exposure to alpha particles, risk, incidence

For citation: Briks KV, Azizova TV, Grigoryeva ES, Bannikova MV. Risk of Angina Pectoris in a Cohort of Nuclear Workers. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2026;71(2):40–47. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2026-71-2-40-47

References

1. Барбараш О.Л., Карпов Ю.А., Панов А.В. и др. Стабильная ишемическая болезнь сердца. Клинические рекомендации 2024 // Российский кардиологический журнал. 2024. Т.29. №9. С. 6110 [Barbarash O.L., Karpov Yu.A., Panov A.V., et al. Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Clinical Guidelines 2024. Rossiyskiy Kardiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29;9:6110 (In Russ.)].   Doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6110.
2. Gaidai O., Cao Y., Loginov S. Global Cardiovascular Diseases Death Rate Prediction. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2023;48;5:1016–1022. Doi: 10.1016/J.Cpcardiol.2023.101622.
3. Min Choon Tan, Yong Hao Yeo, Boon Jian San, Addi Suleiman, Justin Z. Lee, Arka Chatterjee, Kristen A. Sell‐Dottin, John P. Sweeney, F. David Fortuin, and Kwan S. Lee. Trends and Disparities in Valvular Heart Disease Mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2024;13;8:e030895. Doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030895. Epub 2024 Apr 8.10.1161/JAHA.123.03089.
4. Hammond-Haley M., Hartley A., Essa M., DeLago A.J., Marshall D.C., Salciccioli J.D., Shalhoub J. Trends in Ischemic Heart Disease and Cerebrovascular Disease Mortality in Europe: an Observational Study 1990–2017. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;77;13:1697–1698. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.013.
5. Бойцов С.А., Шальнова С.А., Деев А.Д. Смертность от сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний в Российской Федерации и возможные механизмы ее изменения // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. C.C.Корсакова. 2018. Т.118. №8. С. 98–103 [Boytsov S.A., Shal’nova S.A., Deyev A.D. Mortality from Cardiovascular Diseases in the Russian Federation and Possible Mechanisms of its Change. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. C.C.Korsakova = S.S.Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2018;118;8:98–103 (In Russ.)]. Doi: 10.17116/jnevro201811808198.
6. Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. V.I. New York, United Nations, 2008. 392 p.
7. Moseeva M.B., Azizova T.V., Grigoryeva E.S., Haylock R.G. Risks of Circulatory Diseases among Mayak PA Workers with Radiation Doses Estimated Using the Improved Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2014;53;2:469–477. Doi: 10.1007/s00411-014-0517-x.
8. Azizova T.V., Haylock R.G.E., Moseeva M.B., Bannikova M.V., Grigoryeva E.S. Cerebrovascular Diseases Incidence and Mortality in an Extended Mayak Worker Cohort 1948–1982. Radiat. Res.2014;182;5:529–544. Doi: 10.1667/RR13680.1.
9. Azizova T.V., Grigoryeva E.S., Haylock R.G.E., Pikulina M.V., Moseeva M.B. Ischeamic Heart Disease Incidence and Mortality in an Extended Cohort of Mayak Workers First Employed in 1948– 1982. Br. J. Radiol. 2015;88;1054:20150–20169. Doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150169.
10. Takahashi I., Shimizu Y., Grant E.J., Cologne J., Ozasa K., Kodama K. Heart Disease Mortality in the Life Span Study, 1950–2008. Radiat. Res. 2017;187;3:319–332.  Doi: 10.1667/RR14347.1.
11. Gillies M., Richardson D.B., Cardis E., Daniels R.D., O’Hagan J.A., Haylock R., Laurier D., Leuraud K., Moissonnier M., Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Thierry-Chefh I., Kesminieneh A. Mortality from Circulatory Diseases and other Non-Cancer Outcomes among Nuclear Workers in France, the United Kingdom and the United States (INWORKS). Radiat. Res. 2017;188;3:276–290. Doi: 10.1667/RR14608.1.
12. Little M.P. Radiation and Circulatory Disease. Mutat. Res. 2016;770:299–318. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.008.
13. Ivanov V.K., Maksioutov M.A., Chekin S.Yu., Petrov A.V., Biryukov A.P., Kruglova Z.G., Matyash V.A., Tsyb A.F., Manton K.G., Kravchenko J.S. The Risk of Radiation-Induced Cerebrovascular Disease in Chernobyl Emergency Workers. Health Phys. 2006;90;3:199–207. Doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000175835.31663.ea.
14. Azizova T.V., Grigorieva E.S.,  Hunter N.,  Pikulina M.V.,  Moseeva M.B. Risk of Mortality from Circulatory Diseases in Mayak Workers Cohort Following Occupational Radiation Exposure. J Radiol Prot. 2015;35;3:517–538. Doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/517.
15. Azizova T.V., Briks K.V., Bannikova M.V., Grigoryeva E.S. Hypertension Incidence Risk in a Cohort of Russian Workers Exposed to Radiation at the Mayak Production Association Over Prolonged Periods. Hypertension. 2019;73;6:1174–1184. Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11719.
16. Azizova T.V., Day R.D., Wald N., Muirhead C.R., O’Hagan J.A., Sumina M.V., Belyaeva Z.D., Druzhinina M.B., Teplyakov I.I., Semenikhina N.G., Stetsenko L.A., Grigoryeva E.S., Krupenina L.N., Vlasenko E.V. The “Clinic” Medical-Dosimetric Database of Mayak Production Association Workers: Structure, Characteristics and Prospects of Utilization. Health Phys. 2008;94;5:449–458. Doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000300757.00912.a2.
17. Fountos B.N. The Department of Energy’s Russian Health Studies Program. Radiat Protect Dosim. 2017;176;1–2:3–5. Doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw110.
18. Napier B.A. The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): an Introduction to the Documentation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;176;1–2:6–9. Doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx020.
19. Preston D., Lubin J., Pierce D., McConney M. Epicure users Guide. Seattle, Hirosoft, 1993. 186 p.
20. Akaike H. A New Look at Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control, 1974. P. 716–723.

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.01.2026. Accepted for publication: 25.02.2026.