Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 2

DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-2-38-48

A.N. Koterov1, L.N. Ushenkova1, A.A. Wainson2, I.G. Dibirgadzhiev1,
M.V. Kalinina1, A.Yu. Bushmanov1

Dose Dependence for Mortality from Circulatory Diseases in Nuclear Workers (Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis):
Lack of Low Doses Effect and Confirmation of UNSCEAR and ICRP Threshold at 0.5 Gy

1 A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

2 N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia

Contact person: Alexey N. Koterov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Abstract

Based on the maintained database (source database) on effects in nuclear workers (NW), a selection of major studies of the relationship between mortality from diseases of the circulatory system (CVD; codes 390–459 according to ICD-9 and I00–I99 according to ICD-10) and external radiation dose. The sample included 30 papers and covered cohorts from 6 countries plus an NW cohort from 15 countries. For the sample, in most cases based on published standardized mortality rates (SMR), the relative risks (RR) of mortality from CVD were calculated for the selected dose groups with subsequent processing of the material for outliers. Initial: n = 207; final sample: n = 199; covers very low (0–10 mSv; 15.8 % of the sample), low (>10–100 mSv; 45.8 %) and moderate (>100–1000 mSv; 36.4 %) doses; data for high doses (>1000 mSv; n = 4; 2 % of the sample), due to dubiousness, were excluded.

A systematic review and pooled analysis of the RR for mortality from CVD depending on the dose on an ordinal scale was performed on the final sample. For the entire dose range (0–1000 mSv) and for moderate doses, statistically significant trends in increasing RR were found when expressed in five types of regressions (except for the logarithmic one for the entire range). Although the r values were small (0.230–0.293), the effect was clear. The ERR per 1 Gy (Sv) calculated for moderate doses using linear regression was 0.54. This value is higher than those obtained previously in meta-analyses, but should be considered as the most adequate.

No dose relationship was found for the very low + low dose range (0–100 mGy); the r coefficients for the regressions were either negligible or negative at statistical insignificance. For the subthreshold dose range for CVD mortality after exposure (according to UNSCEAR and ICRP: 500 mSv), only a weak trend towards an increase in RR was found, statistically insignificant, despite the large sample size (n = 191), while for the dose range 500–1000 mSv, the highest tendency among the pooled analyzes was revealed to increase the risk depending on the level of exposure (r = 0.297–0.423; statistically insignificant due to the small sample size: n = 8).

It is concluded that for mortality from CVD after irradiation, the threshold value of 0.5 Gy established by UNSCEAR and ICRP and confirmed in the present pooled analysis should be strictly adhered to. Due to the lack of effects of low doses, it is inappropriate to raise the issue of low dose effects in the context of these pathologies.

Keywords: diseases of the circulatory system, mortality, radiation, nuclear workers, low doses, moderate doses, effect threshold

For citation: Koterov AN, Ushenkova LN, Wainson AA, Dibirgadzhiev IG, Kalinina M, Bushmanov AYu. Dose Dependence for Morta-

lity from Circulatory Diseases in Nuclear Workers (Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis): Lack of Low Doses Effect and Confirmation of Unscear and Icrp Threshold at 0.5 Gy. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(2):38–48. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-2-38-48 

 

References

1. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death: Based on the Recommendations of the Ninth Revision Conference, 1975, and Adopted by the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, 1975 revision. Volume I. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1977. 353 p. (Руководство по международной статистической классификации болезней, травм и причин смерти. Классификация основана на рекомендациях Конференции по Девятому пересмотру (‎1975 г.)‎ и принята Двадцать девятой Всемирной ассамблеей здравоохранения. Пер. с англ. Том 1. ВОЗ, Женева. М.: Медицина, 1980. – 758 с.)

2. Classification of Diseases, Functioning, and Disability. CDC. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHS. National Center for Health Statistics. World Health Organization (WHO). 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/index.htm (address data 2024/01/09).

3. UNSCEAR 2006. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Vol. I. Annex B Epidemiological evaluation of cardiovascular disease and other non-cancer diseases following radiation exposure. United Nations. – New York, 2008. P. 325–383.

4. UNSCEAR 2010. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 2010. Fifty-seventh session, includes Scientific Report: summary of low-dose radiation effects on health. United Nations. – New York, 2011. – 106 p.

5. UNSCEAR 2013. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annex. Vol. II. Annex B. Effects of radiation exposure of children. United Nations. – New York, 2013. P. 1–268.

6. UNSCEAR 2019. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Annex A. Evaluation of selected health effects and inference of risk due to radiation exposure. – New York, 2020.
P. 21–192.

7. ICRP Publication 118. ICRP Statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs – threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Annals of the ICRP. Ed. by C.H. Clement. Amsterdam – New York: Elsevier, 2012. – 325 p.

8. Hamada N., Fujimichi Y. Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: history, current situation and future prospects // J. Radiat. Res. 2014. Vol. 55. № 4. P. 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru019.

9. Shimizu Y., Kodama K., Nishi N., Kasagi F., Suyama A., Soda M. et al. Radiation exposure and circulatory disease risk: Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivor data, 1950–2003 // Brit. Med. J. 2010. V. 340. Article b5349. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5349.

10. Котеров А.Н., Вайнсон А.А. Конъюнктурный подход к понятию о диапазоне малых доз радиации с низкой ЛПЭ в зарубежных обзорных источниках: нет изменений за 18 лет. Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2022. Т. 67. № 5. С. 33–40. Koterov AN, Wainson AA. Conjunctural approach to the concept of low dose radiation range with low let in foreign review sources: no changes for 18 years. Medits. Radiologiia i Radiat. Bezopasnost (Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety; Moscow). 2022;67(5):33–40. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.). https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2022-67-5-33-40.

11. Котеров А.Н. От очень малых до очень больших доз радиации: новые данные по установлению диапазонов и их экспериментально-эпидемиологические обоснования // Мед. радиология и радиац. безопасность. 2013. Т. 58. № 2. С. 5–21. Koterov A.N. From very low to very large doses of radiation: new data on ranges definitions and its experimental and epidemiological basing. Medits. Radiologiia i Radiat. Bezopasnost (‘Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety’; Moscow). 2013;58(2):5–21. (In Russ., Engl. abst.)

12. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Вайнсон А.А., Дибиргаджиев И.Г., Бирюков А.П.. Избыточный относительный риск смертности от болезней системы кровообращения после облучения. Сообщение 1. Обзор обзоров и мета-анализов, декларирующих эффекты малых доз // Радиац. биология. Радиоэкология. 2023, том 63, № 1, с. 3–33. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Wainson A.A., Dibirgadzhiev I.G., Biryukov A.P. Excess relative risk of mortality from disease of the circulation system after irradiation. Report 1. Overview of reviews and meta-analysis declared effects of low doses // Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. (Radiation biology. Radioecology; Moscow). 2022;63(1):3–33. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803123010095.

13. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Wainson A.A., Dibirgadzhiev I.G., Biryukov A.P. Excess relative risk of mortality from diseases of the circulation system after irradiation: report 1. overview of reviews and meta-analysis declared effects of low doses. Biology Bulletin (Moscow). 2023. V. 50. № 12. P. 3155–3183. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359023120142.

14. Little M.P., Azizova T.V., Richardson D.B., Tapio S., Bernier M.-O., Kreuzer M. et al. Ionising radiation and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis // Brit. Med. J. 2023. V. 380. Article e072924. 16 p. (with Suppl. 81 p.). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072924.

15. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Вайнсон А.А. Работники ядерной индустрии – к вопросу об унификации русскоязычной терминологии (краткое сообщение) // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2023. Т. 68. № 3. С. 80–84. Koterov AN, Ushenkova LN. Wainson AA. Nuclear workers – on the question of unification of russian-language terminology (brief report). Medits. Radiologiia i Radiat. Bezopasnost (Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety; Moscow). 2023;68(3):80–84. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-3-80-84.

16. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Калинина М.В., Бирюков А.П. Краткий обзор мировых исследований лучевых и нелучевых эффектов у работников ядерной индустрии. Медико-биологические проблемы жизнедеятельности (Гомель). 2020. № 1. С. 17–31. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P. Brief review of world researches of radiation and non-radiation effects in nuclear industry workers. Medical and Biological Problems of Life Activity (Gomel). 2020; (1): 17–31. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.)

17. Котеров АН, Ушенкова ЛН, Калинина МВ, Бирюков АП. Сравнение риска смертности от солидных раков после радиационных инцидентов и профессионального облучения // Медицина катастроф. 2021. № 3. С. 34–41. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P. Comparison of the risk of mortality from solid cancers after radiation incidents and occupational exposures. Meditsina katastrof (‘Disaster Medicine’, Moscow) 2021;(3):34–41 (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.33266/2070-1004-2021-3-34-41.

18. Котеров А.Н., Туков А.Р., Ушенкова Л.Н., Калинина М.В., Бирюков А.П. Средняя накопленная доза облучения для работников мировой ядерной индустрии: малые дозы, малые эффекты. Сравнение с дозами для медицинских радиологов // Радиационная биология. Радиоэкология. 2022. Т. 62. № 3. С. 227–239. Koterov A.N., Tukov A.R.. Ushenkova L.N., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P. Average accumulated radiation doses for world nuclear workers: low doses, low effects. Comparison with doses for medical radiologists. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. (Radiation biology. Radioecology; Moscow). 2022;62(3):227–39. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803122030043. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.)

19 Koterov A.N., Tukov A.R., Ushenkova L.N., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P. Average accumulated radiation doses for global nuclear workers: low doses, low effects, and comparison with doses for medical radiologists // Biology Bulletin. 2022. V. 49. № 12. P. 2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106235902212007X.

20. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Дибиргаджиев И.Г., Вайнсон А.А., Калинина М.В., Бирюков А.П. Избыточный относительный риск катарактогенных нарушений хрусталика у работников ядерной индустрии: систематический обзор и мета-анализ // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2023. Т. 68. № 3. С. 21–32. Koterov AN, Ushenkova LN, Dibirgadzhiev IG, Wainson AA, Kalinina MV, Biryukov AP. Excess relative risk of cataractogenic lense disorders in nuclear workers: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medits. Radiologiia i Radiat. Bezopasnost (Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety; Moscow). 2023;68(3):21–32. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.). https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-3-21-32.

21. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Калинина М.В., Бирюков А.П. «Эффект здорового работника» по показателям общей смертности и смертности от злокачественных новообразований у персонала предприятий ядерной и химической индустрии: мета-анализы // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2023. Т. 68. № 4. С. 43–50. Koterov AN, Ushenkova LN, Kalinina MV, Biryukov AP. The ‘Healthy worker effect’ on indexes of total mortality and malignant neoplasms mortality for nuclear and chemical workers: meta-analysis. Medits. Radiologiia i Radiat. Bezopasnost (Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety; Moscow). 2023;68(4):43–50. (In Russ., Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-43-50.

22. Boice JD Jr. The importance of radiation worker studies // J. Radiol. Prot. 2014. V. 34. № 3. P. E7–E12. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/34/3/E7.

23. Wakeford R. The growing importance of radiation worker studies // Br. J. Cancer. 2018. V. 119. № 5. P. 527–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0134-6.

24. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Бирюков А.П. Критерий Хилла «Временная зависимость». Обратная причинность и ее радиационный аспект // Радиац. биология. Радиоэкология. 2020. Т. 60. № 2. С. 115–152. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Biryukov A.P. Hill’s criteria ‘Temporality’. Reverse causation and its radiation aspect // Radiats. Biol. Radioecol. (‘Radiation biology. Radioecology’; Moscow). 2020. V. 60. № 2. P. 115–152. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S086980312002006X.

25. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Biryukov A.P. Hill’s Temporality criterion: reverse causation and its radiation aspect // Biology Bulletin. 2020. V. 47. № 12. P. 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020120031.

26. Simon S.L., Linet M.S. Radiation-exposed populations: who, why, and how to study // Health Phys. 2014. V. 106. № 2. P. 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000006.

27. Ashmore J.P., Krewski D., Zielinski J.M., Jiang H., Semenciw R., Band P.R. First analysis of mortality and occupational radiation exposure based on the National Dose Registry of Canada // Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998. V. 148. № 6. P. 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009682.

28. UNSCEAR 1972. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annex. Vol. I. ‘Level’. Annex C. Doses from occupational exposure. United Nations. – New York. 1972. P. 173–86.

29. Blettner M., Sauerbrei W., Schlehofer B., Scheuchenpflug T., Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology // Int. J. Epidemiol. 1999. V. 28. № 1. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/28.1.1.

30. Archer V.E., Coons T., Saccomanno G., Hong D.Y. Latency and the lung cancer epidemic among United States uranium miners // Health Phys. 2004. V. 87. № 5. P. 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000133216.72557.ab.

31. Kendall G.M., Muirhead C.R., Mac Gibbon B.H., O’Hagan J.A., Conquest A.J., Goodill A.A., Butland B.K., Fell T.P, Jackson D.A., Webb M.A. Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers // Brit. Med. J. 1992. V. 304. № 6821. P. 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6821.220.

32. Muirhead C.R., Goodill A.A., Haylock R.G., Vokes J., Little M.P., Jackson D.A., O’Hagan J.A., Thomas J.M., Kendall G.M., Silk T.J., Bingham D., Berridge G.L. Occupational radiation exposure and mortality: second analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers // J. Radiol. Prot. 1999. V. 19. № 1. P. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/19/1/002.

33. Muirhead C.R., O’Hagan J.A., Haylock R.G.E., Phillipson M.A., Willcock T., Berridge G.L.C., Zhang W. Third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers: occupational rxposure to ionizing radiation in relation to mortality and cancer incidence. Health Protection Agency. Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards. Radiation Protection Division. HPA-RPD-062. – Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, 2009b. – 150 p.

34. Muirhead C.R., O’Hagan J.A., Haylock R.G.E., Phillipson M.A., Willcock T., Berridge G.L.C., Zhang W. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers // Br. J. Cancer. 2009a. V. 100. № 1. P. 206–212. Supply. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604825.

35. Azizova T.V., Grigorieva E.S., Hunter N., Pikulina M.V., Moseeva M.B. Risk of mortality from circulatory diseases in Mayak workers cohort following occupational radiation exposure // J. Radiol. Prot. 2015. V. 35. № 3. P. 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/517.

36. Azizova T.V., Batistatou E., Grigorieva E.S., McNamee R., Wakeford R., Liu H., de Vocht F., Agius R.M. An Assessment of Radiation-Associated Risks of Mortality from Circulatory Disease in the Cohorts of Mayak and Sellafield Nuclear Workers // Radiat. Res. 2018. V. 189. № 4. P. 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14468.1.

37. Azizova T.V., Bannikova M.V., Grigoryeva E.S., Briks K.V., Hamada N. Mortality from various diseases of the circulatory system in the Russian Mayak nuclear worker cohort: 1948–2018 // J. Radiol. Prot. 2022. V. 42. № 2. Article 021511. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac4ae3. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac4ae3

38. Азизова Т.В., Григорьева Е.С., Хантер Н., Пикулина М.В., Мосеева М.Б. Риск смерти от болезней системы кровообращения в когорте работников, подвергшихся хроническому облучению // Тер. Арх. 2017. Т. 89. № 1. С. 18–27. Azizova T.V., Grigoryeva E.S., Hunter N., Pikulina M.V., Moseeva M.B. Mortality from circulatory diseases in a cohort of patients exposed to chronic radiation. Ter. Arkh. 2017;89(1):18–27. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.17116/terarkh201789118-27.

39. Shilnikova N.S., Koshurnikova N.A., Bolotnikova M.G., Kabirova N.R., Kreslov V.V., Lyzlov A.F., Okatenko P.V. Mortality among workers with chronic radiation sickness // Health Phys. 1996. V. 71. № 1. P. 86–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199607000-00014.

40. Gilbert E.S., Fry S.A., Wiggs L.D., Voelz G.L., Cragle D.L., Petersen G.R. Analyses of combined mortality data on workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant // Radiat. Res. 1989. V. 120. № 1. P. 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3577633.

41. Gilbert E.S., Cragle D.L., Wiggs L.D. Updated analyses of combined mortality data for workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Weapons Plant // Radiat. Res. 1993. V. 136. № 3. P. 408–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3578555.

42. Gilbert E.S., Buchanan J.A. An alternative approach to analyzing occupational mortality data // J. Occup. Med. 1984. V. 26. № 11. P. 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-198411000-00012.

43. Gilbert E.S., Omohundro E., Buchanan J.A., Holter N.A. Mortality of workers at the Hanford site: 1945–1986 // Health Phys. 1993. V. 64. № 6.
P. 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199306000-00001.

44. Zielinski J.M., Ashmore P.J., Band P.R., Jiang H., Shilnikova N.S., Tait V.K., Krewski D. Low dose ionizing radiation exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality: cohort study based on Canadian National Dose Registry of Radiation Workers // Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2009. V. 22.
№ 1. P. 27–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-009-0001-z.

45. Zablotska L.B., Ashmore J.P., Howe G.R. Analysis of mortality among Canadian nuclear power industry workers after chronic low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation // Radiat. Res. 2004. V. 161. № 6. P. 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3170.

46. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Дибиргаджиев И.Г. База данных по стандартизованному отношению смертности (SMR all causes и SMR all cancer) для различных профессий (706 когорт/групп): максимальный «эффект здорового работника» – у космонавтов и врачей // Мед. труда и пром. экол. 2023. Т. 63. № 3. С. 179–192. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Dibirgadzhiev I.G. Database on standardized mortality ratio (SMR all causes and SMR all cancer) for various professions (706 cohorts/groups): the maximum ‘effect of a healthy worker’ – in astronauts and doctors // Med. truda i prom. ekol. (Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology; Moscow). 2023. V. 63. № 3. P. 179–192. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-3-179-192.

47. Котеров А.Н. Критерии причинности в медико-биологических дисциплинах: история, сущность и радиационный аспект. Сообщение 3. Часть 1: первые пять критериев Хилла: использование и ограничения // Радиац. биология. Радиоэкология. 2021. Т. 61. № 3. С. 300–332. Koterov A.N. Causal criteria in medical and biological disciplines: history, essence and radiation aspect. Report 3, Part 1: first five Hill’s criteria: use and limitations // Radiats. Biol. Radioecol. (‘Radiation biology. Radioecology’; Moscow). 2021. V. 61. № 3. P. 300–332. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803121030085.

48. Кокунин В.А. Статистическая обработка данных при малом числе опытов // Укр. биохим. журн. 1975. Т. 47. № 6. С. 776–790. Kokunin V.A. Statistical processing of data from a small number of experiments // Ukr. Biokhim. Zh. (‘Ukrainian Journal of Biochemistry; Kiev). 1975. V. 47. № 6. P. 776–791. (In Russ.)

49. Mostarac P., Malaric R., Hegedusi H. Comparison of outliers elimination algorithms // Proc. 7th Intern. Conf., Smolenice, Slovakia. Measurement. 2009. P. 49–52. Also table ‘Chauvenet’s criterion for rejecting a reading’: https://chetaero.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/chauvenet.pdf (address data 2024/01/12).

50. Zablotska L.B. Mortality analysis of the Canadian and German uranium processing. Contract 87055-13-0577. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Final Report. July 31, 2015.  – 43 p. http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/pdfs/research-project-R587-1.pdf (address data 2017/02/13; in 2024 source unavailable).

51. Zhivin M.S. Epidemiological study of workers employed in the French nuclear fuel industry and analysis of the health effects of uranium compounds according to their solubility // These de doctorat, (France); Universite Paris-Saclay, 2015. – 198 p. https://www.irsn.fr/FR/Larecherche/Formation_recherche/Theses/Theses-soutenues/DRPH/Documents/2015-These-Zhivin.pdf (address data 2024/01/12).

52. Котеров А.Н., Ушенкова Л.Н., Зубенкова Э.С., Калинина М.В., Бирюков А.П., Ласточкина Е.М. и др. Сила связи. Сообщение 2. Градации величины корреляции // Мед. радиология и радиац. безопасность. 2019. Т. 64. № 6. С. 12–24. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Zubenkova E.S., Kalininna M.V., Biryukov A.P., Lastochkina E.M. et al. Strength of association. Report 2. Graduation of correlation size // Medits. Radiologiia Radiat. Bezopasnost (‘Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety’; Moscow). 2019. V. 64. № 6. P. 12–24. (In Russ. Engl. abstr.) https://doi.org/10.12737/1024-6177-2019-64-6-12-24.

53. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP. Ed. by J. Valentin. – Amsterdam – New York: Elsevier, 2007. – 329 p.

54. Hamada N., Fujimichi Y. Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: history, current situation and future prospects // J. Radiat. Res. 2014. V. 55. № 4. P. 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru019.

55. Rubin P, Casarett G. A direction for clinical radiation pathology. The tolerance dose. In: ‘Radiation Effects and Tolerance, Normal Tissue’. Ed. by JM Vaeth. 6th Annual San Francisco Cancer Symposium, San Francisco, Calif., October 1970. Proceedings. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. Basel, Karger, 1972. V. 6. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1159/000392794.

56. Cornfield J. Statistical relationships and proof in medicine [Editorial] // Am. Statistician. 1954. V. 8. № 5. P. 19–21.

57. Lanes S.F. Error and uncertainty in causal inference. In: ‘Causal Inference’. Ed. by K.J. Rothman. Chestnut Hill, MS: Epidemiologic Resources. 1988. P. 173–188.

58. Hill A.B. The environment and disease: association or causation? // Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1965. V. 58. № 5. P. 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076814562718

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

  

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.11.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.12.2023.