JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 6. P. 83–84
DISCUSSION
DOI: 10.12737/article_5c0bdefea14005.22956834
V.Yu. Soloviev, V.I. Krasnyuk
On Possible Mistakes in the Estimation of Radiation Risk Non-Cancer Effects in Mayak Plant Workers
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
V.Yu. Soloviev – Dr. Sci. Biol., PhD Tech., Head of Lab.;
V.I. Krasnyuk – Dr. Sci. Med., Prof., Head of Dep.
REFERENCES
- Azizova TV, Bragin EV, Hamada N, Bannikova MV. Risk Assessment of Senile Cataract Incidence in a Cohort of Nuclear Workers of Mayak Production Association. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(4):15-21.
- Balashevich LI., Izmailov AS. Diabetic ophthalmopathy. - SPb. 2012. 396 p.
- Bragin EV, Azizova TV, Bannikova MV. The risk of morbidity of senile cataract in workers of the enterprise of the nuclear industry. Bulletin of Ophthalmology. 2017;133(2):57-63.
- Gouskova AK. Main Sources of Errors in Lifelong Risk Evaluation for Persons Exposed to Ionizing Radiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014;59(3):26-31.
- Azizova TV, Haylock R, Moseeva MB, Pikulina MV, Grigorieva E.S. Cerebrovascular Diseases Incidence and Mortality in an Extended Mayak Worker Cohort: 1948-1982. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(4):43-61
For citation: Soloviev VYu, Krasnyuk VI. On Possible Mistakes in the Estimation of Radiation Risk Non-Cancer Effects in Mayak Plant Workers. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(6):83-84. Russian.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 5–14
RADIATION BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.12737/article_5c55fb17a02054.31513592
Yu.P. Semochkina1, A.V. Rodina1, E.Yu. Moskaleva1, E.S. Zhorova2, V.P. Saprykin2, S.S. Arzumanov1, V.V. Safronov3
Malignant Transformation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Mouse Tissues after Mixed Gamma-Neutron Irradiation in vitro
1. NRC Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia. E-mail:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
;
2. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia;
3. Research Center “Space Materials Science”, Kaluga, Russia
Yu.P. Semochkina – Junior Researcher;
A.V. Rodina – Leading Researcher, PhD Biol.;
E.Yu. Moskaleva – Leading Researcher, Prof. Dr. Sci. Biol., Member of ERRS;
E.S. Zhorova – Leading Researcher, PhD Biol.;
V.P. Saprykin – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sci. Med.;
S.S. Arzumanov – Deputy Head of Department, PhD Phys.-Math.;
V.V. Safronov – Senior Researcher, PhD Phys.-Math.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the possibility of malignant transformation of control and irradiated mesenchymal stromal stem cells (MSC) from the bone marrow (BM) and brain (BR) and from the adipose tissue (AT) of mice and some cytokines secretion after mixed γ,neutron (γ, n) irradiation and γ-irradiation.
Material and methods: MSCs were isolated and cultured according to generally accepted protocols. γ, n-irradiation was carried out by a collimated beam of neutrons and gamma rays at a special station of the nuclear reactor IR-8. MSCs were irradiated at the 29th passage at doses of 0.05; 0.5 and 2 Gy, were cultured for 10 passages and transplanted subcutaneously 1×106 cells to C57BL/6 syngeneic mice. MSCs AT were irradiated at the facility GUT-200M (60Co) at doses 1–6 Gy. The level of cytokines in the culture medium of MSC was measured by an ELISA.
Results: A decrease in RBE was observed after radiation dose increasing from 0.5 to 4.0 Gy. The maximum of RBE for all MSCs, equal to 5.5, was observed at a dose of 0.5 Gy. After the dose increasing to 2 Gy an average RBE decreased to 2.5, and at dose 4.0 Gy RBE it was 2.0. Tumors were detected after 5 months after transplantation into syngeneic mice of MSC BM irradiated at doses of 0.05; 0.5 and 2 Gy. After transplantation of control MSCs BM and of control and irradiated MSCs BR and MSC AT, no tumors were detected. After subcutaneous injection of γ-irradiated at doses of 0.1; 1 and 6 Gy MSC AT, unlike MSCs BM, no tumors were detected. Histological examination of tumors revealed signs of a low-grade fibrosarcoma with active proliferation and a high degree of malignancy. Tumors contained inclusions from the derivatives of several tissues of mesenchymal origin – muscular, fatty, cartilaginous and bone. In the case of a tumor that developed after transplantation of MSCs BM exposed to γ,n-radiation at a dose of 0.05 Gy, the contact metastasis was detected in the shoulder with the penetration of tumor cells between the muscle fibers. From the tumors, the mouse fibrosarcoma cell lines were obtained. The highest level of cytokines VEGF, HGF and IL6 was found in the culture medium of MSC AT. The level of TGFβ secretion was practically the same in all studied MSCs. After γ,n-irradiation an increase of VEGF secretion in MSC BM, a decrease of IL6 secretion in MSC BM and MSC BR, and an increase in its secretion in MSC AT were detected.
Conclusions: The obtained results testify the high sensitivity of MSC BM to malignant transformation after ionizing irradiation and the much higher resistance of mouse MSC BR and MSC AT. The mechanisms of these differences are yet not known. The highest level of cytokines VEGF, HGF and IL6 was found in the culture medium of MSC AT. After the action of γ,n-radiation, as well as after the action of γ-radiation, the secretion profile of the investigated cytokines was changed, depending both on the dose and on the type of radiation.
Key words: mesenchymal stem cells, malignant transformation, carcinogenesis, γ-irradiation, γ,n-irradiation, neutrons, bone marrow, brain, adipose tissue, cytokines, mice
REFERENCES
1. Zacharatou Jarlskog C, Paganetti H. Risk of developing second cancer from neutron dose in proton therapy as function of field characteristics, organ, and patient age. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(1):228-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.069.
2. Musabaeva LI, Golovkov VМ. Fast neutron therapy for cancer patients. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2015;2:88-94. (Russian.)
3. Taddei PJ, Mirkovic D, Fontenot JD, Giebeler A, Zheng Y, Kornguth D, Mohan R, Newhauser WD. Stray radiation dose and second cancer risk for a pediatric patient receiving craniospinal irradiation with proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 21;54(8):2259-75. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/001.
4. Newhauser WD, Durante M. Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(6):438-48. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3069.
5. Stem Cell Biology with Respect to Carcinogenesis Aspects of Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 131. Ann. ICRP 44(3/4): 7-357. DOI: 10.1177/0146645315595585.
6. Moskaleva EYu, Semochkina YuP, Rodina AV, Chukalova AA, Posypanova GA. Effects of γ-radiation on mesenchymal stem cells from mouse bone marrow and brain and their ability to induce tumors. Radiat Biol Radioecol. 2017;57(3):245-56. (Russian.)
7. Moskaleva EYu, Zhorova ES, Semochkina YuP, et al. Characteristics of tumors that have developed in mice injected with syngenic irradiated mesenchymal stem cells of bone marrow. Cell and Tissue Biology, 2017;11(5):381-8.
8. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, et al. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies // Tissue Eng. 2001;7(2):211-28. DOI:10.1089/107632701300062859.
9. Arzumanov SS, Safronov VV, Strepetov AN. Determination of the absorbed dose in a biological sample after mixed gamma-neutron irradiation. J. Techn. Physics. 2018;88(10):1581-4.
10. Maleta YuS, Tarasov VV. Non-parametric methods of statistical analysis in biology and medicine. Moscow. MSU. 1982. (Russian.)
11. Wolf C, Lafuma J, Masse R, Morin M, Kellerer AM. Neutron RBE for induction of tumors with high lethality in Sprague-Dawley rats. Radiat Res. 2000;154(4):412-20.
12. Broerse JJ, van Bekkum DW, Zoetelief J, Zurcher C. Relative biological effectiveness for neutron carcinogenesis in monkeys and rats. Radiat Res. 1991;128(1 Suppl):S128-35. 13. Kamiya K, Inoh A, Fujii Y, Kanda K, Kobayashi T, Yokoro K. High mammary carcinogenicity of neutron irradiation in rats and its promotion by prolactin. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1985;76(6):449-56.
For citation: Semochkina YuP, Rodina AV, Moskaleva EYu, Zhorova ES, Saprykin VP, Arzumanov SS, Safronov VV. Malignant Transformation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Mouse Tissues after Mixed Gamma-Neutron Irradiation in vitro. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(1):5-14. (Russian).
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 21–25
RADIATION MEDICINE
DOI: 10.12737/article_5c55fb247614e5.98844114
I.M. Petoyan, A.M. Lyaginskaya, A.P. Ermalitskiy, V.V. Kuptsov, N.M. Karelina, A.G. Tsoviyanov, A.S. Samoylov
The Reproductive Health of Male Staff of the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.M. Petoyan – Head of Lab., PhD Tech.;
A.M. Lyaginskaya – General Researcher, Dr. Sci. Biol., Prof.;
A.P. Ermalitskiy – Leading Researcher, PhD Med.;
V.V. Kuptsov – Senior Researcher;
N.M. Karelina – Research Worker;
A.G. Tsoviyanov – Head of Lab.;
A.S. Samoylov – Director General, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof. RAS
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the reproductive health of male staff in the main departments of the Kursk nuclear power plant (NPP).
Material and methods: The fertility and health of newborns were investigated. Data on marital status of 626 men of the staff and data about 813 newborns in families of male staff were analyzed. In the control group the data on the health status of newborns and pregnant groups of the population of Kurchatov city was used. Sources of information on doses to the personnel were the forms of a single system for monitoring and recording individual doses of radiation № 1-DOS “Information on the doses to persons in the conditions of normal operation of technogenic sources of ionizing radiation”.
Results: Total occupational doses to the end of the main reproductive period (20–40 years) did not exceed 210 mSv, which is significantly below the threshold for temporary sterility during long-term irradiation (400 mSv/year, ICRP). Cases of infertile marriages in the families of the men of the staff (0.17 %) are below the estimation of the frequency of male infertility in Russia (1–2 %).
Infant health in families of male staff and in the control group had no differences. The frequency of birth of health children was 65.3 % in families of male staff and 66.0 % for the control group. Frequency of birth of children with malformations was 35.7±6.5 per 1,000 live births and statistically (p = 0.84) did not differ from the frequency in the control group (37.4±5.3 per 1,000 live births) and was below the level adopted by the ICRP to calculate the radiation genetic risk (60 per 1,000 live births). There were no differences influenced by mother factors (age, diseases and complications during pregnancy) on fetal development and newborn health in families of the staff and control group.
According to the calculations, the total occupational doses to men before the conception of children for more than 98 % of cases did not exceed 100 mSv, i.e. it was below the doses (>100 mSv), for which the genetic effects were observed in the number of epidemiological studies. However, it should be noted that 25.6 % of childbirth were in families, where men were older than 30 years, i.e. at the age, which is not subject to the additional job restrictions under the planned increased exposure.
Conclusions: The impact of occupational exposure on the reproductive health status of men staff of the Kursk NPP was not identified.
Key words: Kursk NPP, male staff, reproductive health, infertility, health status, newborn children
REFERENCES
- Radiation safety standards (RSS-99/2009): Public health regulations. Moscow: Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor. 2009. 100 p. (Russian).
- ICRP Publication 103. Eds. Kiselev MF, Shandala NK. Moscow: PKF «Alana». 2009. 311 p. (Russian)
- Crow J.F. A comparison of fetal and infant death rates in progeny of radiologist. Amer J Roentgenol. 1955;73:467-71.
- Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA, McIntyre JM. A case-control study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. Amer J Epidemiol. 1988;127:226-42.
- Parker L, Pearce MS, Dickinson HO, et al. Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):1407-14.
- Stepanova EI, Skvarskaya EA. Clinical-genetic and cytogenetic characteristics of children born to liquidator of the Chernobyl accident. Collection of research papers “Genetic consequences of emergency radiation situations”. Moscow: Publ. RUDN. 2002. P. 115-6. (Russian).
- Petrushkina NP. Health of children (1-2 generation) of workers of the first atomic industry Production Association “Mayak” (clinical and epidemiological study). Moscow: Dr. Sci. Med. Diss. 2003. 371 p. (Russian).
- Lyaginskaya AM, Tukov AR, Osipov VA, et al. Congenital malformation at posterity of the liquidators of the consequences of Chernobyl accident. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2009;49(6):694-702. (Russian).
- Tsovianov AG, Kosterev VV, Kyuchkov VV, et al. Information-analytical reference book “Doses to personnel of organizations and the population in the areas served by the FMBA of Russia and the Russian Ministry of Defense in 2010”. Moscow. 2012. 86 p. (Russian).
- Merkov AM, Polyakov LE. Sanitary statistics (manual for physicians). Moscow. Medicine. 1974. 384 p. (Russian).
- Lebedev SV. Infertility: real statistic. 2009. http://www.probirka.org/ zhenskoe-besplodie/306-besplstat.html (Russian).
- Kerimova ZM. Intrauterine growth retardation. Principles of pregnancy. Moscow: Abstract of diss. to PhD Med. Sci. 2002. 25 p. (Russian).
For citation: Petoyan IM, Lyaginskaya AM, Ermalitskiy AP, Kuptsov VV, Karelina NM, Tsoviyanov AG, Samoylov AS. The Reproductive Health of Male Staff of the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(3):21-5. (Russian).
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 15–20
RADIATION BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.12737/article_5c55fb18bed8d6.85887139
I.K. Belyaev
Protection of Spermatogenesis with β-Carothin in Radiation Exposure.
Message 2: Carotenoid Enrichment of Diet with Single Acute External γ-Irradiation
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.K. Belyaev – Head of Lab., Senior Researcher, PhD Biol.
Abstract
Purpose: Experimental evaluation of the efficiency of β-carotene by single acute γ-irradiation of spermatogenesis correction radiation-induced disorders in males (♂) of Wistar rats during prolonged carotenoid enrichment of a diet.
Material and methods: Single external gamma irradiation ♂ was performed at the IGUR facility (137Cs, dose rate 0.029 Gy/s). The carotenoid used up on feeding ♂ in a mixture with cottage cheese for 2 months before irradiation, then – throughout the study period three times a week. During the days that ♂ were in cells with intact ♀ β-carotene was administered ♂ orally by a probe in the form of a suspension in vegetable oil. The damage and effectiveness of protection of spermatogenesis of irradiated ♂ were judged by the state of their reproductive function.
Results: β-carotene in intact ♂ rats reduced the overall, pre- and postimplantation embryonic mortality, respectively, from 29 to 14, from 22 to 9, and from 10 to 5 %. At the stage of mature sperm following irradiation ♂ dose of 3 Gy – total and pre-implantation mortality from 45 to 29, and from 23 to 9 %. After irradiation at a dose of 5 Gy – total, an pre- and postimplantation induced embryonic death, respectively, from 67 to 56, from 23 to 13 % and from 56 to 43 %. At the stage of spermatids after irradiation in dose 1 Gy – pre-implantation mortality from 23 to 9 %; in the dose of 3 Gy – the number of dead embryos in pregnant ♀ from 12 to 3; at a dose of 5 Gy total embryonic mortality from 57 to 49 %. Carotenoid enrichment of a diet of ♂ irradiated at doses of 3 and 5 Gy, has not corrective impact on the state indicators of their reproductive function, evaluated at fertilization of ♀ sperm irradiated at the stage of spermatocyte. At the stage of spermatogonia after irradiation at a dose of 3 Gy β-carotene increased fertility of ♂ 7 to 12 living embryos and reduced the overall, before – induced postimplantation mortality, respectively, with 63 and 43, from 42 to 25 and from 35 to 19 %. No statistically significant effect of β-carotene on the weight loss of the gonads irradiated ♂ was revealed. Compared to short-term regimen, long-term enrichment of a diet of irradiated ♂ β-carotene more effectively reduced embryonic mortality of their offspring.
Conclusions: Correction effects of β-carotene enrichment of the diet in radiation-induced disturbances by single acute external γ-irradiation at doses of 3 and 5 Gy of spermatogenesis in Wistar rats at stages of mature spermatozoa, spermatids and spermatogonia have been established.
Key words: external acute γ-irradiation, spermatogenesis, β-carotene, introduction to the diet, rats
REFERENCES
1. Belyaev IK. Protection of spermatogenesis with β-carotene during radiation exposure. Message 1: Single acute external γ-irradiation. Med. Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(2):5-14. (Russian).
2. Loskutova ZF. Vivarium. Moscow. 1980. 94 p. (Russian).
3. Vakulova LA, Zhidkova TA, Samokhvalov GI, Khristoforov VL. Method for obtaining beta-carotene. 1995. Patent number 2032667. (Russian).
For citation: Belyaev IK. Protection of Spermatogenesis with β-Carothin in Radiation Exposure. Message 2: Carotenoid Enrichment of Diet with Single Acute External γ-Irradiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(1):15-20. (Russian).
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 26–30
RADIATION MEDICINE
DOI: 10.12737/article_5c55fb303a76b7.90880128
I.A. Galstyan, A.S. Kretov, L.A. Merzlikin, I.V. Vlasova, A.Yu. Bushmanov, Yu.D. Udalov
Possible Criteria of the Diagnosis of Occupational Lung Cancer in Workers of Uranium Mines
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.A. Galstyan – Head of Lab., Dr. Sci. Med.;
A.S. Kretov – Head of Dep.;
L.A. Merzlikin – Specialist in Occupational Medicine, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.;
I.V. Vlasova – Specialist in Occupational Medicine;
A.Yu. Bushmanov – Deputy Director, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.;
Yu.D. Udalov – Deputy Director General, PhD Med.
Abstract
Purpose: Search of possible criteria of the diagnosis of occupational lung cancer in workers of uranium mines on the basis of the analysis of literary data.
Material and methods: The analysis of literary data with the purpose of allocation of possible criteria and their use for the diagnosis of occupational lung cancer at 6 employees of uranium mines.
Results: The following criteria for the diagnosis of occupationally caused lung cancer at workers of uranium mines are marked out:
- Total effective dose of radiation exposure is more 200–250 mSv (40–50 WLM).
- Period in underground conditions is not less than 10 years.
- Dust content in a workplace is more than 1 mg/m3.
- Hygienic assessment of working conditions – the 3rd class, 3.2–3.4 degree.
- The latent period of development of a tumor is not less 10 years.
- Development of primary and multiple synchronous or metachronous lung cancer.
Also the diagnosis of occupational lung cancer the pulmonary anamnesis (frequent bronchitis, pneumonia, chronic bronchitis of the smoker) has to be considered.
On the basis of the marked-out criteria documents of 6 employees of uranium mines, at which lung cancer has been revealed, are considered. On the basis of the carried-out analysis at 5 patients relation of a disease with professional activity has been established. One patient was denied this relation.
Conclusion: Authors offer this expert approach to experts’ discussion as above-mentioned criteria is planned to be used by the pathologists who are carrying out observation of workers of uranium production and for the solution of questions of relation of a disease with professional activity of the patient.
Key words: uranium production, radon, lung cancer, occupational diseases, establishment criteria
REFERENCES
- ICRP Publication 103. Recommendations ICRP of 2007. Moscow. 2009: 312 p.
- Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 54 session. Vienna. 2006: 350 p.
- List of occupational diseases. Annex of the Order of Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia. April 27 2012. No. 417n. (Russian).
- ICRP Publication 126. Radiological Protection against Radon Exposure. Moscow. 2015: 91 p. (Russian).
- Lung cancer in workers of uranium mines. In «Lung cancer epidemiology». Ed. DG Zaridze, IK Pleshko, YuS Sidorenko, TV Shelyakina. Moscow. 1990: 240 p. (Russian).
- Gneusheva GI, Malashenko AV. Occupational pathology of lungs in workers of uranium mines. Moscow. 2007: 140 p. (Russian).
- Ahmed DU. Professional radiation safety at uranium mines and facilities. Bulletin IAEA. 1981;23(2):34-8.
- Shalaev IL, Glushinsky MV, Tokarev HM, Byzov EV. Epidemiological investigation of lung cancer mortality of uranium miners. BRM. 1986;1:80-5. (Russian).
- Belugina RN. Epidemiological investigation of uranium miners. BRM. 1986;1:48-52. (Russian).
- Malashenko AV, Nakatis YaA. Questions of professional lung pathology of uranium miners. Medicine of Extreme Situations. 2012;2:28-34. (Russian).
- Malashenko AV, Nakatis YaA. Ethiology and specificities of morphogenesis of lung cancer in workers of uranium miners. Clinic Hospital. 2017;19(1):17-22. (Russian).
- ICRP Publication 115. Risk of Lung Cancer Occurrence after Radon and it’s Decay Products Exposure. Radon statement. Moscow. 2013: 91 p. (Russian).
- Szymendera SD. The radiation exposure compensation act (RECA): compensation related to exposure to radiation from weapons testing and uranium mining. CRS Report. 2015: 17 p. (Russian).
- Ivanov AE, Kurshakova NN, Soloviev AI. Radiation lung cancer. Moscow. Medicine. 1990: 223 p. (Russian).
- Mahlay TN, Burenin PI. About relation of cancer of trachea, bronchial tubes, lung with nonspecific lung diseases in uranium facility workers. BRM.1983;3:35-40.
- Manual on hygienic assessment of working environment and labor process factors. Criteria and classification of labor conditions. 1.11.2005: 161 p.
For citation: Galstyan IA, Kretov AS, Merzlikin LA, Vlasova IV, Bushmanov AYu, Udalov YuD. Possible Criteria of the Diagnosis of Occupational Lung Cancer in Workers of Uranium Mines. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(1):26-30. (Russian).