JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 63-75
NON-IONIZING RADIATION
DOI: 10.12737/article_5b83c0638debb0.86408449
M.S. Markov
Electromagnetic Fields in Biosphere: Benefit and Hazard
Research International. Williamsville NY 14221, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
This paper is written in order to summarizes the role of electromagnetic fields in the origin and evolution of life on Earth, as well as hazard and benefit from electromagnetic fields. It is an attempt to show that today the mankind and the entire biosphere are subjected to a global experiment conducted without protocol, monitoring and even knowing the parameters of the applied electromagnetic fields. At the same time, electromagnetic fields used in magnetotherapy has been proven to be beneficial in treatment of various health problems. Magnetotherapy is non-invasive, safe, and easily applied methods to directly treat the site of injury, the source of pain, and inflammation. The development of advanced communication technologies year after year increases the hazard for the biosphere and mankind. The paper discuses the contradiction between scientists and technological engineers in the line thermal or nonthermal are effects of electromagnetic fields. The specific problems with children health are analyzed. It focused on the facts that at the end of the second decade of this century more aggressive mobile communications, such as 4G and especially 5G are being introduced in the North America and Europe without any attempt to evaluate the hazard for civilization.
Key words: electromagnetic fields, mobile communication, public health, protect children
REFERENCES
- Gilbert W. De Magnete (written in latin). Translated and published by Dower publication; 1600. 368 p.
- Bassett CAL, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Acceleration of fracture repair by electromagnetic fields. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1974;238:242-62.
- Todorov N. Magnetotherapy. Sofia: Meditzina i Physcultura Publishing House; 1982. Bulgarian.
- Kholodov YA. Man in Magnetic Web. Moscow: Nauka; 1976. Russian.
- Polk C, Postow E (eds.). CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 1986.
- Barnes F, Greenebaum B (eds.). Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 3rd edn. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2007.
- Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds.) Bioelectromagnetic Medicine. Marcel Dekker, New York. 2004.
- Rosch P (ed.). Bioelectromgnetic and Subtle Energy Medicine. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2015.
- Markov MS, Grigoriev YG. WiFi technology - an uncontrolled experiment on human health. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 2013;32(2):200-8.
- Belyaev I. Biophysical mechanisms for non-thermal microwave effects. In: Markov MS (ed.) Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2015.
- Shupak N. Therapeutic uses of pulsed magnetic-field exposure: a review. Radio Sci Bull. 2003;307:9-32.
- Markov MS. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy: history, state of the art and future. Environmentalist. 2007;27:465-75.
- Lin J (ed.). Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2011.
- Markov MS. Benefit and hazard of electromagnetic fields. In: Markov M (ed.). Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2015. p. 15-29.
- IARC WHO, Classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Press release No. 208; May 31 2011. 3 p.
- Markov MS. Impact of physical factors on the society and environment. Environmentalist. 2012;32 (2):121-30.
- Kane R. Cellular Phones: Russian roulette. Vantage Press Inc. New York. 1995; 241 p.
- Markov MS. Thermal versus nonthermal mechanisms of interactions between electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In: Ayrapetyan SN and Markov M (eds.) Bioelectromagnetics: Current concepts. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. p. 1-16.
- Markov MS. Biological effects of extremely low frequency magnetic fields. In: Ueno S (ed) Biomagnetic Stimulation, New York: Plenum Press; 1994. p. 91-102.
- Oltman R. 5G is coming. Microwave Journal; Oct 2017. p. 40-2.
- Betskii OV, Lebedeva NN. Low-intensity millimeter waves in biology and medicine. In: Rosch PJ and Markov MS (eds.). Bioelectromagnetic Medicine. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. p. 741-60.
- Bassett CAL. Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Critical Review Biomedical Engineering. 1989;17:451-529.
- Bassett CAL. Therapeutic uses of electric and magnetic fields in orthopedics. In: D. Karpenter and S. Ayrapetyan (eds.) Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. p. 13-8.
- Adey WR. Potential therapeutic applications of nontherrmal electromagnetic fields: Ensemble organization of cells in tissue as a factor in biological field sensing. In: Rosch PJ, Markov MS. (eds.) Bioelectromagnetic Medicine. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. p. 1-14.
- Valberg, P. How to plan EMF experiments. Bioelectromagnetics. 1995;16:396-401.
- SanPiN. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF EMR) under occupational and living conditions. Moscow: Minzdrav; 1996. Russian.
- Cho CK, D’Andrea JA. Review of effects of RF fields on various aspects of human health. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(S6):S5-6.
- Foster K. Bioelectromagnetics pioneer Herman Schwan passed away at age 90. Bioelectromagnetics Newsletter. 2005;2:1-2.
- Schwan HP, Piersol GM. The absorption of electromagnetic energy in body tissues. Rev Phys Med Rehabil. 1954;33(6):371-404.
- Michaelson SM. Human exposure to nonionizing radiant energy - potential hazards and safety standards. Proc. IEEE. 1972;1:389-421.
- Lin JC. Interaction of two cross-polarized electromagnetic waves with mammalian cranial structures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME. 1977;23(5):371-5.
- Durney CH, Massodi E, Iskander MF. Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook, Rep. SAM-TR-78-22, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine. Brooks Air Force Base, Texas; 1978.
- Lin JC. Electromagnetic pulse interaction with mammalian cranial structures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1976;23:61-3.
- Schwan HP. Microwave radiation; hot spots in conducting spheres by electromagnetic waves and biological implications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME. 1972;19(1):53-8.
- Schwan HP. Microwave radiation; biophysical considerations and standards criteria. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME. 1972;19(4):304-12.
- Parliamentary Assembly. Council of Europe. 2011. Resolution 1815. The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment; 2011. Available from: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17994.
- Jiang Z, Wei Hong, Nianzu Zhang, Chau Yu. Progress and challenges of test technologies for 5G. Microwave Journal. January 2018:80-94
- IMT-2020 5G wireless technology architecture. IMT-2020 (5G) Promotion Group, May 2015. Available from: www.scribd.com/doc/294556768/WHITE-PAPER-ON-5G-WIRELESS-TECHNOLOGY-ARCHITECTURE-pdf.
- Grigoriev YG. Mobile communications and health of population: the risk assessment, social and ethical problems. Environmentalist. 2012;32(2):193-200.
- Grigoriev YG, Khorseva NI. Mobile communications and health of children. Risk assessment of the use of mobile communication by children and adolescents. Recommendations to children and parents 2014. Moscow: Economics; 2014. 230 p. Russian.
- Markov MS. Magnetic and electromagnetic field dosimetry - necessary step in harmonization of standards. - Proc. WHO Meeting, Varna, April 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/Varna.
- Nikita KS, Kiourri A. Mobile communication field in biological systems. In: Lin J (ed.) Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton; 2011. p. 261-329.
- Koulouridis S, Nikita KS. Study of the coupling between human head and cellular phone helical antennas. IEEE Trans Electrom Compat. 2004;46:62-71.
- Christ A, et al. Age-dependent tissue specific exposure of cell phone users. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1763-83.
- Christ A, et al. Impact of pinna compression on the RF absorption in the head of adults and juvenile cell phone users. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31:406-12.
- Grigoriev Y, Khortzeva N. A longitudinal study of psycho-physiological indicators of pupils - user mobile communication in Russia (2006-2017). Children are at the group of risk. In Markov MS (ed.) Mobile Communications and Public Health. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2018. p. 237-52.
- WHO Backgrounder; 2003 Apr.
- Boice J, Tarone RE. Cell phone, cancer and children. J Natl Inst Cancer. 2011;103(16):1211-3.
- Justesen DR. A comparative study of human sensory thresholds: 2450 MHz microwaves vs far-infrared radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 1982;3:117-25.
For citation: Markov MS. Electromagnetic Fields in Biosphere: Benefit and Hazard. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(4):63-75. DOI: 10.12737/article_5b83c0638debb0.86408449
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 5–10
RADIATION SAFETY
DOI: 10.12737/article_5bc895f377f578.86526226
Innovative Technologies of Pre-Shift Psychophysiological Control of Personnel as Means of Increasing Safety of Radiation and Nuclear Enterprises and Objects of the State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM
A.F. Bobrov1, V.V. Ivanov2, M.Yu. Kalinina3, T.M. Novikova2, V.V. Ratayeva4, V.I. Sedin1, V.Yu. Shcheblanov1, E.S. Shchelkanova4, A.S. Samoylov1
1. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Central Health-Sanitary Unit № 91, Lesnoy; Murmansk region, Russia; 3. The State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM, Moscow, Russia; 4. Northwest Center for Radioactive Waste Management “SevRAO”, a Branch of FSUE RosRAO, Zaozersk, Murmansk region, Russia
A.F. Bobrov – Chief Researcher, Dr. Sci. Biol., Prof.; V.V. Ivanov – Head PND, PhD Med.; M.Yu. Kalinina – Deputy Director, PhD Med.; T.M. Novikova – Medical Psychologist; V.V. Ratayeva – Specialist of Radiation and Environmental Safety; V.I. Sedin – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.; V.Yu. Shcheblanov – Head of Lab., Dr. Sci. Biol., Prof.; E.S. Shchelkanova – Leading Specialist; A.S. Samoylov – Director General, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof. RAS
Abstract
Purpose: Validation of requirements to the hardware and software of pre-shift psychophysiological monitoring and assessment of effectiveness of use of technology of the vibraimage at pre-shift psychophysiological control of personnel of radiation and nuclear dangerous enterprises and objects of the State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM.
Material and methods: Pre-shift psychophysiological control of employees of Elektrochimpribor plant (20 people) and the Northwest Center for Radioactive Waste Management “SevRAO ”, a Branch of FSUE RosRAO, Zaozersk of Murmansk region (18 workers of facilities for management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste). Pre-shift psychophysiological monitoring was carried out within 3 months. During the research measurement of arterial blood pressure, assessment of health, activity and mood was taken. The psychophysiological condition was estimated according to innovative technology of the vibraimage with the use of the Vibrastaff program.
Results: Reliability improvement of a human factor is one of the main ways of improving radiation and nuclear safety of the facilities and objects of the State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM. It demands improving methods and means of psychophysiological providing. First of all methods,tools and criteria of pre-shift psychophysiological control. The developed requirements to the hardware and software of pre-shift psychophysiological monitoring and innovative technology of assessment of parameters of the vibraimage allow quickly (within 1 minute) to receive the decision on the admission / not the admission to work. Its practical use gives the chance, accordingto pre-shift psychophysiological control in due time, to accept organizational, medical and other administrative decisions for improving radiation and nuclear safety of the enterprises and objects of the State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM.
Key words: vibraimages, pre-shift medical examinations, pre-shift psychophysiological control, psychophysiological adaptation, psychophysiological “price” of work performance, radiation safety, human factor
REFERENCES
- Bobrov AF, Bushmanov AYu, Sedin VI, Shcheblanov VYu. System assessment of the results of psychophysiological control. Medicine of Extreme Situations. 2015;(3):13-9. Russian.
- Minkin VA. Vibraimage. Saint Petersburg: Renome; 2007. Russian.
- Program for monitoring psychophysiological state of the operator of VibraStaff [Internet ]. Saint Petersburg: Multiprofile facility ELSIS; 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 1]. Available from: http://psymaker.com/downloads/VIManualRuVS.pdf. Russian.
For citation:Bobrov AF, Ivanov VV, Kalinina MYu, Novikova TM, Ratayeva VV, Sedin VI, Shcheblanov VYu, Shchelkanova ES, Samoylov AS. Innovative Technologies of Pre-Shift Psychophysiological Control of Personnel as Means of Increasing Safety of Radiation and Nuclear Enterprises and Objects of the State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(5):5-10. Russian.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 19–25
RADIATION THERAPY
DOI: 10.12737/article_5bc8965ecf7302.64445070
Outcomes of Combined Treatment for Breast Cancer with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction, Chemotherapy and Conformal Radiotherapy
E.V. Timoshkina, S.I. Tkachev, A.V. Nazarenko, O.P. Trofimova, V.V. Glebovskaya, S.M. Ivanov, T.N. Borisova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
E.V. Timoshkina – Radiation Oncologist; S.I. Tkachev – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sc. Med., Prof., Vice-President of RATRO; A.V. Nazarenko – Head of Dep., PhD Med.; O.P. Trofimova – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sc. Med., Prof., RATRO Member, RUSSCO Member, Russian Oncologists Association Member, ARCA Member, Member of Association of Specialists of Problem of the Melanoma, Member of Russian Oncomammologists; V.V. Glebovskaya – Senior Researcher, PhD Med.; S.M. Ivanov – Senior Researcher, PhD Med.; T.N. Borisova – Senior Researcher, PhD Med.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the oncological results and late complication rate in breast cancer patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy.
Material and methods: 32 patients with I–IIIC breast cancer after combined treatment which included immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were reviewed.
Results: All 32 patients got skin erythema as an acute adverse effect. 6 (18 %) of them got acute mucositis. Median follow-up was 35 months (range 12–112 months). 2 (6 %) patients had local recurrence after 46 and 31 months since the operation day. Locoregional control rate was 94 %. 9 (28 %) patients presented distant metastases at term 8–71 months since the operation day, and metastases in bones, brain, lungs, liver and non-regional lymph nodes were diagnosed. 2 (6 %) patients died because of disease progression.
Late adverse effects of skin and soft tissue in irradiated area were found in 4 (13 %) patients – capsular contracture was diagnosed 1 (n = 1), 2 (n = 2) and 3 (n = 1) stages. In two cases of four, capsular contracture was asymptomatic and found during the second stage of breast reconstruction while changing tissue expander to implant. Capsulotomy was performed, and aesthetic effect was good. In one case capsular contracture was the reason of implant removal, and then second reconstruction using tissue expander was performed.
Conclusion: Nowadays immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is an essential part of combined treatment. Breast cancer patients after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction can be treated in adequate manner, and breast reconstruction is not a contraindication for radiotherapy. Low complication rates can still be acquired with the use of state-of-art 3D and 4D radiotherapy techniques and supportive care.
Key words: breast cancer, breast reconstruction, tissue expander, radiotherapy, late complications
REFERENCES
- Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2016 (Morbidity and Mortality Rates). Moscow; 2017. Russian.
- Tsoi B, Ziolkowski NI, Thoma A, Campbell K, O'Reilly D, Goeree R. Systematic review on the patient-reported outcomes of tissue-expander/implant vs autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):1038-48.
- Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, Vo A, O'Neill AC, Butler K, et al. A Comparison of Psychological Response, Body Image, Sexuality, and Quality of Life between Immediate and Delayed Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Long-Term Outcome Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 October;138(4):772-80.
- O'Sullivan B, Levin W. Late Radiation-Related Fibrosis: Pathogenesis, Manifestations, and Current Management. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 2003 July;13(3):274-89.
- Hawkins D, Abrahamse H. Biological Effects of Helium-Neon Laser Irradiation on Normal and Wounded Human Skin Fibroblasts. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2005;23(3):251-9.
- Peirong Y. Breast reconstruction at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Gland Surgery. 2016 Aug;5(4):416-21.
- Quinn TT, Miller GS, Rostek M, Cabalag MS, Rozen WM, Hunter-Smith DJ. Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update. Gland Surgery. 2016;5(2):174-86.
- El-Sabawi B, Sosin M, Carey JN, Nahabedian MY, Patel KM. Breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy: A systematic review of surgical outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;112(5):458-64.
- El-Sabawi B, Carey J, Hagopian T, Sbitany H, Patel KM. Radiation and breast reconstruction: Algorithmic approach and evidence-based outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(8):906-12.
- Carnevale A, Scaringi C, Scalabrino G, Campanella B, Osti MF, De Sanctis V, et al. Radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications and patient satisfaction. Radiol Med. 2013 Oct;118(7):1240-50.
- Piroth MM, Piroth DM, Pinkawa M, Woodruff SG, Holy R, Eble MJ. Immediate Reconstruction with an Expander/Implant Following Ablatio Mammae because of Breast Cancer: Side Effects and Cosmetic Results after Adjuvant Chest Wall Radiotherapy. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2009 Oct;185(10):669-74
- Wagner RM, Spzunar SM, Stefani WA, Williams JL, Edhayan E, Dul CL, et al. Radiation and depression associated with complications of tissue expander reconstruction. [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.
- Fischer LH, Nguyen D. Double-Chamber Tissue Expanders Optimize Lower Pole Expansion in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Requiring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76 (Suppl 3):S171-4.
- Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, Djohan R, Nutter B, Lyons J, Dietz J. Complication Rates of Radiation on Tissue Expander and Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:S202-10.
For citation:Timoshkina EV, Tkachev SI, Nazarenko AV, Trofimova OP, Glebovskaya VV, Ivanov SM, Borisova TN. Outcomes of Combined Treatment for Breast Cancer with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction, Chemotherapy and Conformal Radiotherapy. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(5):19-25.Russian.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 11–18
RADIATION MEDICINE
DOI: 10.12737/article_5bc8960ba308e0.31051556
Psychophysiological Adaptation of Patients with Local Radiation Injuries
N.A. Metlyaeva, A.Yu. Bushmanov, V.I. Krasnuk, A.A. Davtyan, O.V. Shcherbatykh, L.A. Yunanova, V.V. Koren’kov, D.S. Yunanov
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
N.A. Metlyaeva – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sc. Med.; A.Yu. Bushmanov – Senior Vice-President, Dr. Sc. Med., Prof.; V.I. Krasnuk – Head of Department No. 2, Dr. Sc. Med.; A.A. Davtyan – Head of Department of Acute Radiation Pathology (hematological), PhD Med.; O.V. Shcherbatykh – Junior Researcher; L.A. Yunanova – Engineer; V.V. Koren’kov – Head of Special Admission Office, PhD Med.; D.S. Yunanov – Engineer
Abstract
Purpose: Assessment of psycho-physiological adaptation of patients with local radiation injuries (LRI), depending on the presence or absence of an established connection with an accident at work in connection with a radiation accident or an incident that has undergone a psychophysiological examination.
Material and methods: Clinical and psychophysiological examination of 57 patients with local radiation injuries was performed, 20 of them, whose LRI s were associated with an accident at work (Group 1) and 37 patients, whose LRI connection was not established with production (Group 2). The mean age of the examined subjects was 41.6 ± 3.1 and 52.0 ± 1.6 years. The psychophysiological examination was carried out using the automated program-methodical complex “Expert”, designed to study the personality of a person, the cognitive and intellectual characteristics of a person using the method of the Multilateral Personality Study is an adaptation of MMPI, the method of Cattell’s 16PF, the Raven test, simple and complex sensorimotor reactions and reaction to a moving object.
Results: Clinical and psychophysiological assessment of personality and the actual mental state of patients with LRI having an established connection to an accident at work in comparison with patients with LRI with an unrelated connection with production allowed to determine the main types of disturbance of psychophysiological adaptation in a kind of anxiety-hypochondriacal type of adaptation disorder with a tendency to dissocial behavior in patients with LRI who have an established connection with an accident at work.
Conclusion: Anxiety-hypochondriacal type of disturbance of psychophysiological adaptation in patients with LRI is caused primarily by concern about the state of physical health, which determined the tension of mental adaptation with a tendency to neglect social norms and rules of behavior, with a tendency to dissocial behavior, psychasthenia, autization, distancing, alienation, affective rigidity, the desire to put the blame on others for the violation of interpersonal relationships, life difficulties and emotions conflicts. The dissocial type of the disturbance of psychophysiological adaptation was revealed mainly in patients with LRI who have established connection with an accident at work.
Key words: local radiation injuries, acute radiation syndrome, psyhaphysiological adaptation, radiation risk
REFERENCES
- Petushkov VN. Development and course of local radiation injury of tissues. Acute radiation syndrome in humans. Ed. Kurshakova NA. Moscow: Medicine; 1965. 314 p. Russian.
- Orlov VM, Petushkov VN, Sych LI. Acute radiation syndrome of hands. Medical Radiology. 1970;15(1):53-6. Russian.
- Barabanova AV, Nadezhina NM. Clinical picture of local radiation lesions. Radiation Medicine. P. 15 Radiation damage to humans Moscow. Publishing house. 2001;2:161-85. Russian.
- Berezin FB, Miroshnikov MP, Sokolova ED. Method of multilateral study of personality. Structure, basis of interpretation, some areas of application. 3 edition, amended and updated. Moscow: Publishing House «BEREZIN FELIX BORISOVICH»; 2011. 320 p. Russian.
For citation: Metlyaeva NA, Bushmanov AYu, Krasnuk VI, Davtyan AA, Shcherbatykh OV, Yunanova LA, Koren’kov VV, Yunanov DS. Psychophysiological Adaptation of Patients with Local Radiation Injuries. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(5):11-8. Russian.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 26 –32
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
DOI: 10.12737/article_5bc8968bb9d9a3.36167944
SPECT/CT in the Assessment of the Jaw Autograft Viability
A.D. Ryzhkov1, L.P. Yakovleva1, A.S. Krylov1, S.V. Shiryaev1, M.A. Kropotov2, V.A. Sobolevsky1, Yu.Yu. Dikov1, R.B. Azimova1, V.Yu. Ivashkov1
1. N.N. Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology. Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center. Moscow, Russia
A.D. Ryzhkov – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sc. Med.; L.P. Yakovleva – Head of the Dep., PhD Med, Member of RUSSCO, Member of the Russian Association of Endocrine Surgeons, Member of the Society of Specialists in the Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors; A.S. Krylov – Radiologist, PhD Med., Member of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (EANMMI); S.V. Shiryaev – Head of Lab., Dr. Sc. Med., President of the OSMI, Member of EANMMI, Member of ACNMMI, Member of SNMMI; M.A. Kropotov – Leading Researcher, Dr. Sc. Med., Head of Dep., Member of RUSSCO, Member of the Russian Association of Endocrine Surgeons, Member of the Society of Specialists in the Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors; V.A. Sobolevsky – Head of Dep., Dr. Sc. Med.; Yu.Yu. Dikov – Research Worker, PhD Med.; R.B. Azimova – Research Worker, PhD Med.; V.Yu. Ivashkov – Research Worker
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of SPECT/CT for the assessment of graft viability following revascularized bone grafts in patients with mandibular (18) and maxilla (1) reconstruction.
Material and methods: We investigated 19 patients with revascularized grafts from the fibula (16 patients), iliac crest (2 patients) and shoulder blade graft (1). For the follow up of all these patients, 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT was performed between 4–5 days postoperatively. The evaluation of the grafts was based on a comparison of tracer uptake between graft and the cranium.
Results: 17 of 19 grafts had an uncomplicated clinical course. Complications in the graft occurred in two patients. In the analysis of planar scintigrams with uncomplicated healing were showed correct assessment in 10 of 17 patients and in 1of 2 patients with signs of necrosis of graft fragments. SPECT/CT was performed in addition to planar imaging.
The increased uptake grafts were showed with SPECT/CT in all patients with uncomplicated clinical course. In the failed 2 grafts, decreased uptake was observed in both patients. In the analysis of SPECT/CT images the correct results were showed in all clinical cases.
Conclusion: SPECT/CT performed within 6 days after the mandibular reconstruction is a useful tool to monitor the viability and early complications of revascularized mandibular and maxilla bone grafts. SPECT/CT is also recommended to interpretation of the bone scans and to precise assessment of graft viability.
Key words: maxilla and mandible reconstruction, autograft viability, bone scintigraphy, SPECT/CT
REFERENCES
- Plotnikov NA (ed.). Bone plastic of the lower jaw. Moscow; 2003. 136 p. Russian.
- Matyakin EG. Reconstructive plastic surgery for head and neck tumors. Head and neck tumors: European School of Oncologists. Moscow; 1993. Russian.
- Nerobeev AI, Verbo EV, Karayan AS, Drobot GV. Substitution of defects in the lower zone of the face after removal of the mandibular neoplasms. Annals of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. 1997;(3):24-31. Russian.
- Imasato S, Fukunishi K. Potential efficacy of GTR and autogenous bone grafts for autotransplantation to recipient sites with osseous defects: evaluation by re-entry procedure. Dent Traumatol. 2006;20(1):42-7. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00227.x.
- Bauss O, Fenske C, Schilke R, Schwestka-Polly R. Autotransplantation of immature third molare into edentulous and atrophied jam sections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;33(6):558-63. DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.008.
- Behrens P, Schwaninger M, Meiss L. Calcium phosfate bone substitutte materials: a long term follow up. J Jone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;79:161-7.
- Hervas I, Floria LM, Bello P, et al. Microvascularized fibular graft for mandibular reconstruction. Detection of viability by bone scintigraphy and SPECT. Clin Nucl Med. 2001;26:225-9.
- Malizos KN, Soucacos PN, Vragalas V, et al. Three phase bone scanning and digital arteriograms for monitoring vascularized fibular grafts in femoral head necrosis. Fotopoulos Ant Angiol. 1995;14(3):319-26.
- Acton CH, Layt C, Gwynne R, et al. Investigative modalities of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(12):2050-5. DOI:10.1097/00005537-200012000-00014.
- Aydogan F, Akbay E, Cevik C, Kalender E. Blood-pool SPECT in addition to bone SPECT in the viability assessment in mandibular reconstruction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(4):587-92.
- Van Cann E, Koole R, Oyen W, et al. Assessment of mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma by various modes of imaging: constructing a diagnostic algorithm. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:535–41. DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.02.009.
- Ryzhkov AD, Yakovleva LP, Krylov AS, et al. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT / CT) in assessing the viability of maxillary autografts in patients with malignant tumors of the head and neck. In the book: Collection of scientific works of the III Petersburg International Cancer Forum «White Nights 2017» FGBU «NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2017. 38 p. Russian.
- Buyukdereli G, Guney IB, Ozerdem G, Kesikstas E. Evaluation of vascularized graft reconstruction of the mandible with Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med. 2006;20(2):89-93.
For citation: Ryzhkov AD, Yakovleva LP, Krylov AS, Shiryaev SV, Kropotov MA, Sobolevsky VA, Dikov YuYu, Azimova RB, Ivashkov VYu. SPECT/CT in the Assessment of the Jaw Autograft Viability. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(5):26-32. Russian.




