JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 2. P. 5-12
RADIATION SAFETY
N.K. Shandala1, A.A. Filonova1, E.S. Shchelkanova2, K. Sneve3, N.Ya. Novikova1, M.P. Semenova1, R.A. Aladova1, T.I. Gimadova1, N.A. Busarova1, R.I. Sheina1, L.N. Volkonskaya1
Radiation Survey at Andreeva Bay Sites of Temporary Storage of the Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste
1. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Northwest Center for Radioactive Waste Management SevRAO (NWC SevRAO – Branch of RosRAO), Murmansk, Russia; 3. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA), Oslo, Norway
CONTENT
Purpose: To investigate the radiation-hygienic situation and to estimate effective doses to the public, who live and/or work (workers of B personnel category) at Andreeva Bay sites of temporary storage of the spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste.
Material and methods: During 2005–2013, 13 expeditions have been made and more than 300 samples of the environmental media, local foodstuffs and drinking water have been collected; personal dose monitoring of the public has been made, as well as in-situ dosimetry. Monitoring points were located within the health protection zone and surveillance area. The samples were examined by gamma-spectrometry, radiochemistry, radiometry and dosimetry methods.
Results: Current conditions of the spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste storage at sites of temporary storage (STS) have caused substantial degradation of some part of spent nuclear fuel during its storage. As a result, radionuclides have already penetrated into the soil near the storage areas at the depth of a few meters. Some areas on the sites had high dose rates – up to about 140 μSv/h – due to contamination from past spent fuel storage practices. The obtained results suggest that currently there are no major radiological impacts of the STS sites on the adjacent territory and population, with the possible exception of the sea media in the coastal areas (bottom sediments, seaweeds). The concentrations of 137Cs and 90Sr in the environmental media are at background levels typical for the present region.
Conclusions: Radiation situation at STS in Andreeva Bay is significant and complicates the safe management of work to remove the spent nuclear fuel and stored radioactive waste. On-site measurements suggest that remediation work will have to be planned with taking into account the on-site contamination in two ways. Firstly, the activity levels will present external and internal exposure hazards to workers involved in remedial operations. Secondly, the spent nuclear fuel removal must be planned so as not to disturb and, hence release, significant contamination from the sites.
Key words: site of temporary storage, health protection zone, surveillance area, environmental media, local foodstuffs, personal dose monitoring, effective dose
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 59-68
RADIATION PHYSICS, TECHNOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY
L.Ya. Klepper
Parameters of Identification of Synthesized Mlq-Model for Planning Radiotherapy of Malignant Tumours
Central Economic Mathematical Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Work is devoted to the description of synthesized MLQ-model (synthesis LQ-model and the model intended for the description of NTCP) and the analysis of its properties. Problems of definition of parameters MLQ-model for lung radiotherapy on set of the systematized clinical data are investigated.
Key words: radiotherapy, MLQ-model, parameter identification
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 45-51
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
A.V. Khmelev1, P.S. Bakay2
Study of the 124I Cyclotron Production Parameters Impact for its Activity and Radionuclide Purity
1. Russian Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of RAMS, Moscow, Russia
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Definition of terms wherein cyclotron-produced 124I applicable for using in PET-diagnostics in oncology.
Material and methods: Numerical simulation of 124I production process in nuclear reactions initiated in the target TeO2 by 10–15 MeV proton beam as well as such reaction products decay was carried out.
Results: It is shown that 124I activity gains the maximal value (86 mCi) at proton energy E = 12 MeV (for “beam current (I) × irradiation time” (t0) parameter equaled 100 m A×hour) and it decreases on ~ 10 % at grow of 123Te impurity concentration in the target from 0.5 up to 10 %. Existence of time span after the end of the target irradiation wherein produced 124I satisfy to radionuclide purity and activity requirements for application in PET-diagnostics was found. Beginning of this time span depends on proton energy and concentration of impurity 123Te (Ki). 124I has become applicable in 2.1–8.3 days from the end of irradiation at energy changing in the range of 10–15 MeV. Beginning of time span grows from 4.7 days up to 5.1 days at Ki increasing from 0.5 up to 10 % at E = 12 MeV and It0 = 100 μAhour. 124I application time grows with increasing of It0. This time also depends on proton energy and it gains the maximal value of 15.2 days at E = 11 MeV and It0 = 100 μAhour.
Conclusion: Radionuclide purity and activity of 124I are determined by parameters of its cyclotron production – beam current, target irradiation time and proton energy as well as 123Te impurity concentration in the target and time from the end of the irradiation. Dependences of the beginning and duration of time span of cyclotron produced 124I for its application in PET-diagnostics from these parameters are established and studied.
Key words: cyclotron, 124I radionuclide, activity, radionuclide purity
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 52-58
RADIATION PHYSICS, TECHNOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY
V.Yu. Soloviev, T.M. Khamidulin
Voxel Phantom Technology in Accidental Dosimetry: Perspectives
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Evaluate the possibility of using voxel-phantom technology combined with a set of dosimeters for the purposes of gamma-neutron radiation field accidental dosimetry
Material and methods: The object of research is the vital organs volume distribution over dose within the voxel phantom irradiated in the field of neutron and gamma-ray source with the emission spectrum of the fissile material.
Results: For a typical energy distribution of the field of fissile material gamma-neutron radiation the family of neutron and gamma-ray dose distributions inside the voxel phantom has been obtained. The calculations were done for four different orientations of the phantom relative to the point-type radiation source (front, back, left and right side), not taking into account the walls, ceiling and the floor of the hall, and for each one the amount of dose absorbed by dosimeter (on the surface of the chest area) was evaluated. The phantom was placed at a distance of 2.5 meters away from the radiation source. Using this data the characteristics of the vital organs mass distribution over the dose were estimated. It was shown that red bone marrow is affected most when phantom is irradiated from behind, and the least damage is caused by radiation from the left and right sides with the same distance to the radiation source. With the dosimeter located on the chest the bone marrow mass over dose distribution median is 5 times smaller than the dosimeter reading in case of frontal irradiation, and significantly larger than the dosimeter reading in case of irradiation from behind. For practical calculations the dimensions of the hall and all the elements of physical shielding must be taken into account.
Conclusion: The result of the study is development of computational and experimental complex for the emergency dosimetry, which consists of a computational module and a set of gamma and neutron radiation dosimeters. The resulting information gives physicians full amount of data about vital organs radiation damage severity and dose distribution throughout the body, necessary for choosing optimal treatment strategy and tactics immediately after reading the dosimeter.
Key words: voxel phantom, gamma-neutron irradiation, dose, red bone marrow, accident dosimetry
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 39-44
RADIATION THERAPY
A.O. Rasulov, D.V. Kuzmichev, S.I. Tkachev, V.F. Tsaryuk, S.S. Gordeyev, A.G. Perevoschikov, V.V. Glebovskaya, A.V. Polinovskiy
Factors of Chemoradiotherapy Efficacy of Localized Rectal Cancer
N.N. Blokhin Canser Research Center of RAMS, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Factors of treatment response after chemoradiotherapy with fluorpyrimidines and radiosensitizers are discussed.
Methods: 137 patients, who received 5×5 Gy chemoradiotherapy were included in this study. A multifactor analysis was performed regarding the impact of sex, age, tumor histology, tumor size, treatment scheme, tumor stage (II or III) and time to surgery on tumor regression.
Results: No significant association was observed in investigated factors and grade III–IV treatment response. There was only low correlation between time to surgery and tumor regression.
Conclusions: We observed no impact of investigated factors on tumor regression. Complete and near-complete tumor regression in our study was associated with absence of local recurrences and distant metastases.
Key words: colorectal cancer, combined treatment, chemoradiotherapy, tumor regression