JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Выпуски журналов
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 6
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-129-135
Yu.D. Udalov1, A.A. Sazhina1, A.A. Timchenko2, V.I. Pustovoit1
Modern Visualisaion Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions
1 A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
² Tinkoff Development Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Anna Sazhina , e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize current approaches to the diagnosis of renal masses with a focus on the multimodal imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.
Material and methods: A structured literature review was conducted covering Russian and international sources published between 2015 and 2024. Diagnostic methods included ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion CT, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Special attention was given to radiomics, machine learning algorithms (CNN, SVM, XGBoost), and the integration of augmented/virtual reality tools in oncological urology.
Results: CT and MRI demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity up to 95 %), while AI-based models such as KidneyNet and 3D RES-UNET achieve >96 % accuracy in tumor segmentation and classification. Radiomics and texture analysis support histological subtype differentiation, tumor grading prediction, and reduction of diagnostic subjectivity. AR/VR technologies enhance preoperative planning and personalized clinical decision-making.
Conclusions: The integration of AI technologies with multimodal imaging improves diagnostic precision, facilitates clinical workflows, and promotes the development of personalized oncological urology. Standardization of data acquisition protocols, external validation of algorithms, and resolution of ethical issues related to patient data use remain essential for large-scale implementation.
Keywords:radiation diagnostics, multimodal imaging, renal masses, artificial intelligence, radiomics, texture analysis, KidneyNet
For citation: Udalov YuD, Sazhina AA, Timchenko AA, Pustovoit VI. Modern Visualisaion Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(6):129–135. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-129-135
References
1. Instruktivno-Metodicheskiye Ukazaniya po Ispol’zovaniyu Polnogo Perechnya Kodov Morfologii Opukholey (MKB-O) i ikh Perevodu v Kody Yedinoy Sistemy Populyatsionnykh Rakovykh Registrov Rossii = Instructional and Methodological Guidelines for the Use of the Complete List of Tumor Morphology Codes (ICD-O) and their Translation into Codes of the Unified System of Population-Based Cancer Registries of Russia. Ed. O.F.Chepik, V.M.Merabishvili. St. Petersburg Publ., 1996. 31 p. (In Russ.)
2. Mezhdunarodnaya Statisticheskaya Klassifikatsiya Bolezney i Problem, Svyazannykh so Zdorov’yem = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva, World Health Organization Publ., 1995. 698 p. (In Russ.).
3. Spravochnik Sopostavleniya Kodov MKB-9 i MKB-10 Peresmotrov po Klassu Novoobrazovaniy = Handbook of Comparison of ICD-9 and ICD-10 Revision Codes by Neoplasm Class. Ed. V.M.Merabishvili. St. Petersburg Publ., 1998. 91 p. (In Russ.).
4. WHO Report of 01.02.2024 (In Russ.). URL: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2024/02/1449057
5. Zlokachestvennyye Novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2022 Godu (Zabolevayemost’ i Smertnost’) = Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (Incidence and Mortality). P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (In Russ.). URL: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/zis-2022-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf.
6. Merabishvili V.M., Poltoratskiy A.N., Nosov A.K., et al. The State of Oncological Care in Russia. Kidney Cancer (Incidence, Mortality, Reliability of Accounting, One-Year and Year-Long Mortality, Histological Structure). Part 1. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology. 2021;17;2:182-194 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-182-194. EDN YWWJJW.
7. Kadyrleyev R.A., Bagnenko S.S., Bus’ko Ye.A., et al. Multiparametric Ultrasound Examination with Contrast Enhancement of Solid Renal Formations in Comparison with the Computed Tomography Method. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2021;12;4:74–82 (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2021-12-4-74-82.
8. Elstob A., Gonsalves M., Patel U. Diagnostic Modalities. International Journalof Surgery. 2016;36;Pt. C:504–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.005 .Epub 2016 Jun 15.
9. Yamshchikov O.N., Yemel’yanova N.V., Zagorodnova D.S. Modern Methods of Radiation Diagnostics of Kidney Neoplasms (Literature Review). Meditsina i Fizicheskaya Kul’tura: Nauka i Praktika = Medicine and Physical Education: Science and Practice. 2021;3;1:14-22
(In Russ.). doi: 10.20310/2658-7688-2021-3-1(9)-14-22. EDN NFDUUK. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45428143
10. Kadyrleyev R.A., Bus’ko Ye.A., Kostromina Ye.V., et al. Ultrasound Examination with Contrast in the Algorithm for Diagnosing Solid Renal Formations. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2021;12;1:14–23 (In Russ.). doi: 22328/2079-5343-2020-12-1-14-23. EDN TDGSSC.
11. Shehata M., Abouelkheir R.T., Gayhart M., Van Bogaert E., Abou El-Ghar M., Dwyer A.C., Ouseph R., Yousaf J., Ghazal M., Contractor S., El-Baz A. Role of Ai and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome prediction: a Brief Review. Cancers. 2023;15;10:28-35. doi:10.3390/cancers15102835.
12. Lomonosova Ye.V., Gol’bits A.B., Rubtsova N.A., Alekseyev B.YA., Kaprin A.D. Perfusion Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Kidney Diseases (Literature Review). Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya = Medical Visualization. 2023;27;2:85–98 (In Russ.). doi: 10.24835/1607-0763-1220.
13. Haralick R.M., Shanmugam K., Dinstein I. Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. SMC. 1973;3;6:610–21. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314.
14. Gorduladze D.N., Sirota Ye.S., Rapoport L.M., et al. Possibilities of Texture Analysis of Radiation Imaging Methods in the Diagnosis of Renal Parenchyma Formations. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology. 2021;17;4:129–35 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-4-129-135.
15. Mosoyan M.S., Gilev Ye.S., Aysina N.A. Dobrokachestvennyye Obrazovaniya Pochek = Benign Kidney Tumors. Textbook Manual. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskiy Gosudarstvennyy Ekonomicheskiy Universitet Publ., 2022. 27 p. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2023-14-4-7-18.
16. Reva S.A., Shaderkin I.A., Zyatchin I.V., Petrov S.B. Artificial Intelligence in Oncourology. Eksperimental’naya i Klinicheskaya Urologiya = Experimental & Clinical Urology. 2021;14;2:46-51 (In Russ.). doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-46-51.
17. Yu H.S., Scalera J., Khalid M., Touret A.S., Bloch N., Li B., et al. Texture Analysis as a Radiomic Marker for Differentiating Renal Tumors. Abdominal Radiology. 2017;42;10:2470-2478. doi:10.1007/ s00261-017-1144-1.
18. Yan L., Liu Z., Wang G., Huang Y., Liu Y., Yu Y., et al. Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma by Texture Analysis on CT Images. Academic Radiology. 2015;22;9:1115-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.04.004.
19. Feng Z., Rong P., Cao P., Zhou Q., Zhu W., Yan Z., et al. Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Texture Analysis of CT Images of Small Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma. Euro Radiol. 2018;28;4:1625-1633. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5118-z.
20. Zholdubayev A.A., Glybochko P.V., Alyayev Yu.G., et al. Automated System for Supporting Medical Decision-Making in the Treatment of Patients with Renal Parenchyma Neoplasms - the First Experience of using the Sechenov.AI_Nephro web Platform - Results of Multicenter Testing. Urologiya = Urology. 2024;5:12-22 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/urology.2024.5.12-22. EDN RQKKFX. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=74502433.
21. Almuayqil S.N., Abd El-Ghany S., Abd El-Aziz A.A., Elmogy M. KidneyNet: A Novel CNN-Based Technique for the Automated Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Diseases from CT. Scans. Electronics. 2024;13:4981. doi: 10.3390/electronics13244981
22. Ivanova E., Fayzullin A., Grinin V., Ermilov D., Arutyunyan A., Timashev P., Shekhter, A. Empowering Renal Cancer Management with AI and Digital Pathology. Pathology, Diagnostics and Prognosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2875. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112875.
23. Karel’skaya N.A., Gruzdev I.S., Raguzina V.Yu., Karmazanovskiy G.G. Texture Analysis of CT and MR Images in the Differential Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Review. Luchevaya Diagnostika i Terapiya = Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2023;14;4:7–18 (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2023-14-4-7-18.
24. Chen S., Song D., Chen L., Guo T., Jiang B., Liu A., Pan X., Wang T., Tang H., Chen G., Xue Z., Wang X., Zhang N., Zheng J. Artificial Intelligence-Based on-Invasive Tumor Segmentation, Grades Tratific Ationand Prognosis Prediction for Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Precision. Clinical Medicine. 2023;6;3:19. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad019. URL: https://academic.oup.com/pcm/article-pdf/6/3/pbad019/51300618/pbad019.pdf.
25. Liu J., Yildirim O., Akin O., Tian Y. AI-Driven Robust Kidney and Renal Mass Segmentation and Classification on 3D CT Images. Bioengineering. 2023;10:116. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010116
26. Pustovgar A.A., Yarosh A.L., Oleynik N.V., Soloshenko A.V. First Results of Using the Developed Robotic Device for Adrenal Biopsy under Computed Tomography Control. Sovremennyye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2024;3;4:4-13 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17513/spno.3353. EDNFMTGTH.
27. Timofeyeva Ye.Yu., Azil’gareyeva K.R., Morozov A.O., Taratkin M.S., Yenikeyev D.V. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics, Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Kidney Cancer. Vestnik Urologii = Urology Herald. 2023;11;3:142–148 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-142-148. EDN TDGSSC.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.07.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.08.2025.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 6
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-136-142
A.Yu. Bushmanov, V.P. Zinoviev, O.A. Lebedeva, V.V. Gudkova, A.G. Seitova,
I.O. Usachev, E.G. Zaripova, T.P. Kuznetsova, A.O. Lebedev, M.R. Popchenko
Comparative Tests of Aerosol Permeability
of Fpp and Meltblown Materials Using Nacl Test Aerosol
A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: V.P. Zinoviev, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Relevance: One of the most important protective characteristics of personal respiratory protection equipment (PPE) is the permeability of the anti-aerosol filter (PAF) and the coefficient of suction and permeability of the PPE. To determine these characteristics, PAF and SIZOD tests are carried out using test aerosols, usually obtained by pneumatic spraying of a liquid or by condensation of supersaturated vapor of a volatile substance, such as mineral oil. These aerosols are polidisperse, that is, they have a fairly wide range of particle sizes. Currently, the most common method for assessing the protective properties of materials for SIZOD and products made from them is to measure the concentration of the test aerosol before and after the sample of the filter material when the test aerosol passes through the test sample. When using this method, the most widespread is the use of test aerosols based on mineral oil (oil mist) or microcrystals of table salt (NaCl) obtained by evaporation of mist droplets of its solution. It is known that the smallest particles with sizes less than 0.3 microns are the most harmful and difficult to remove from the body. Since the mass fraction of large particles in the test aerosol is significantly higher than the mass of small ones, even the protection coefficient of 99.9, which is extremely close to unity, is not fully informative, since it does not reflect the protective properties of the material in the field of small particle sizes.
Purpose: The study of the protective properties of materials for SIZOD in the range of small sizes of aerosol particles as the most harmful, as well as the comparison of test results for this indicator of different materials used in the production of SIZOD, is an urgent task, which to a certain extent is being solved in the current study.
Material and methods: Filter materials FPP-15-1,5 and Meltblown were tested to determine protection and penetration factors in accordance with GOST 12.4.119-82.
Results and discussion: The results of the conducted studies have shown the fundamental possibility of determining the material protection coefficient in various size classes of aerosol particles. Evaluation of the protective properties of materials using the spectral density of particles by their size will allow us to identify materials with the highest protective properties and with the lowest to facilitate the selection of personal respiratory protection equipment by enterprises with harmful production conditions.
Conclusions: The results of the conducted research have shown the practical value of using the method of assessing the permeability of aerosol particles based on their size spectrum, as they allowed us to scientifically select materials with the highest protective properties in terms of aerosol permeability.
Keywords: personal protective equipment, aerosol particles, aerosol permeability, protection coefficient, size spectrum
For citation: Bushmanov AYu, Zinoviev VP, Lebedeva OA, Gudkova VV, Seitova AG, Usachev IO, Zaripova EG, Kuznetsova TP, Lebedev AO, Popchenko MR. Comparative Tests of Aerosol Permeability of Fpp and Meltblown Materials Using Nacl Test Aerosol. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(6):136–142. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-6-136-142
References
1. GOST 12.4.119-82 Personal Respiratory Protective Equipment. Method for Assessing Protective Properties for Aerosols (In Russ.).
2. GOST 12.4.028-76 Respirators SHB-1 Lepestok. Technical Conditions (In Russ.).
3. Petryanov I.V., Koshcheyev V.S., Basmanov P.I., Borisov N.B., Gol’dshteyn D.S., Shatskiy S.N., Filatov Yu.N., Kirichenko V.N. «Lepestok.» Legochnyye Respiratory = «Petal». Pulmonary Respirators. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2015. 320 p. (In Russ.).
4. Basmanov P.I., Kirichenko V.N., Filatov Yu.N., Yurov Yu.L. Vysokoeffektivnaya Ochistka Gazov ot Aerozoley Fil’trami Petryanova = Highly Efficient Purification of Gases from Aerosols using Petryanov Filters. Moscow Publ., 2002. 193 p.
5. Samoylov A.S., Udalov Yu.D., Rubtsov V.I., Zinov’yev V.P., Olenina I.V., Timoshenko A.N., Andreyev V.V., Bushmanov Yu.A., Belousov A.V., Kretov A.S., Seleznev N.A., Smirnov Yu.Ye. Radiation Treatment of Protective Suits and the Choice of Personal Protective Equipment for Personnel in Contact with Coronavirus Infection. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost’ = Мedical Radiology and Radiation Safety.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.07.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.08.2025.
CONTENTS № 5 - 2025
View or download the full issue in PDF (Russian)
|
RADIATION |
5 |
Cytogenetic Effects In Mammalian Cells Exposed To Tritium Compounds Rodneva S.M., Sycheva L.P., Guryev D.V. |
|||
|
11 |
3D Cell Spheroid as a Relevant Experimental Model for Screening Potential Nanoradiosensitizers Mysina E.A., Kolmanovich D.D., Popova N.R., Bokl B.A., Pivovarov N.A., Chukavin N.N., Savintseva I.V., Vinnik D.A., Popov A.L. |
||||
|
18 |
Bushmanov A.Yu., Soloviev V.Yu., Zorin V.V., Nikitenko O.V., Bychkova T.M., Lebedev A.O., Ivanov A.A., Zrilova Yu.A., Astrelina T.A., Brunchukov V.A., Rozhdestvenskyj L.M., Fedotov Yu.A., Gimadova T.I., Mershin L.Yu., |
||||
|
23 |
Ignatov M.A., Chigasova A.K., Osipov A.A., Vorobyeva N.Yu., |
||||
|
28 |
Kodintseva E.A., Akleyev A.А. |
||||
|
RADIATION SAFETY |
36 |
Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Udalov Yu.D. |
|||
|
53 |
Current Tasks of Personnel Radiation Protection Management Proskuryakova N.L., Simakov A.V., Abramov Yu.V., Alferova T.M. |
||||
| RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY |
58 |
Osipov M.V., Druzhinina P.S., Sokolnikov M.E. |
|||
|
|
63 |
Influence of Dose Rate on Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease in the Mayak Employee Cohort Azizova T.V., Grigoryeva E.S., Hamada N. |
|||
|
70 |
Korelo A.M., Maksioutov M.A., Chekin S.Yu., Tumanov K.A., |
||||
|
NUCLEAR |
75 |
Peripheral Blood Indices at Different Periods of Chronic Radiation Syndrome (Literature Review) Galstyan I.A., Bushmanov A.Yu., Konchalovsky M.V., Nugis V.Yu., Metlyaeva N.A., Shcherbatykh O.V., Yunanova L.A. |
|||
| RADIATION DIAGNOSTICS |
82 |
Chest X-Ray in the Diagnosis of Mine-Explosion Injury During Mass Examination of the Dead Vasiliev A.Y., Leonov S.V., Blinov (m) N.N., Potrakhov N.N., Leonova L.A., Sakharov A.I. |
|||
|
87 |
The Use of Radiation Diagnostic Techniques in Traumatic Pneumothorax (Clinical Case) Matkevich E.I., Bashkov A.N., Bazhanova Yu.A., Doga V.I., Ivanov I.V., Parinov O.V. |
||||
|
93 |
Use of Radiomics in Mri Studies of Metastatic Liver Lesions Neustroev V.P., Udalov Yu.D., Muslimov M.I., Mingazova E.N. |
||||
|
RADIATION THERAPY |
98 |
Malivanova T.F., Astrelina T.A., Kobzeva I.V., Suchkova Y.B., |
|||
| RADIATION PHYSICS, TECHNIQUES AND DOSIMETRY |
104 |
Assessment of the Uniformity of Dose Distribution in the Patient’s Body During Total Irradiation Lebedenko I.M., Sannikova E.O., Shastina E.N., Rannev E.S. |
|||
CONTENTS № 6 - 2025
View or download the full issue in PDF (Russian)
| RADIATION BIOLOGY |
5 |
Akleyev A.V., Azizova T.V., Ivanov S.A., Kiselev S.M., Melikhova E.M., Fesenko S.V., Shinkarev S.M. |
|||
|
12 |
Melnikova A.A., Afonin A.A., Komarova L.N. |
||||
|
20 |
Arkhipova V.I., Lyaginskaya A.M., Abdullaev S.A., Parinov O.V., |
||||
|
RADIATION |
28 |
Matkevich E.I., Burmistrov V.I., Ivanov I.V. |
|||
|
40 |
Incidence and Spectrum of Radiologic Technicians’ Errors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Nechaev V.A., Vasil’ev A.Yu. |
||||
|
45 |
Safety Issues in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Brief Overview Lagutin A.S., Grigoriev G.Y. |
||||
| RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY |
54 |
Tukov A.R., Ziyatdinov M.N., Prochorova O.N., Mihajlenko A.M., Archegova M.G. |
|||
|
59 |
Silkin S.S., L.Yu. |
||||
|
|
65 |
Mikryukova L.D., Zavyalov D.A. |
|||
|
71 |
Kuznetsova I.S., Sokolnikov M.E., Efimov A.V., Sokolova A.B. |
||||
|
78 |
Bragin E.V. |
||||
| RADIATION MEDICINE |
84 |
Zvereva Z.F., Vanchakova N.P., Torubarov F.S., Lukyanova S.N., Fortunatova L.I., Miroshnik E.V. |
|||
|
97 |
Zherniakova A., Yudina V., Krysiuk O. |
||||
|
|
102 |
Bone Marrow Hematopoiesis of Chronic Radiation Syndrome (Literature Review) Galstyan I.A., Bushmanov A.Yu., Konchalovsky M.V., Nugis V.Yu., Metlyaeva N.A., Shcherbatykh O.V., Yunanova L.A. |
|||
|
108 |
Vishnevskaya T.V., Bronikovskaya E.V., Tsyplenkova M.Yu., Isubakova D.S., Tsymbal O.S., Milto I.V., Takhauov R.M. |
||||
| NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
115 |
Varlamova Yu.V., Kurushin K.D., Sazonova M.A., Ilyushenkova Yu.N., Sazonova S.I. |
|||
|
121 |
Minin S.M., Anashbaev Zh.Zh., Novikova N.V., Samoilova E.A., |
||||
| RADIATION DIAGNOSTICS |
129 |
Modern Visualisaion Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Kidney Lesions Udalov Yu.D., Sazhina A.A., Timchenko A.A., Pustovoit V.I. |
|||
| RADIATION PHYSICS, TECHNIQUES AND DOSIMETRY |
136 |
Comparative Tests of Aerosol Permeability of FPP and Meltblown Materials Using Nacl Test Aerosol. Bushmanov A.Yu., Zinoviev V.P., Lebedeva O.A., Gudkova V.V., |
|||
CONTENTS № 4 - 2025
View or download the full issue in PDF (Russian)
|
RADIATION |
5 |
Melnikova A.A., Afonin A.A., Komarova L.N., Saburov V.O. |
|||
|
10 |
Molodtsova D.V., Kotenkova E.A., Polishchuk E.K., Osipov A.A., |
||||
|
16 |
Mysina E.A., Popova N.R., Shemyakov A.E., Savintseva I.V., |
||||
|
21 |
Soloviev V.Yu., Bushmanov A.Yu., Ushakov I.B., Nikitenko O.V., |
||||
|
25 |
Kodintseva E.A., Akleyev A.А. |
||||
|
33 |
Merkulov M.V., Astrelina T.A., Usupzhanova D.Yu., Brunchukov V.A., Kobzeva I.V., Suchkova Yu.B., Iashin N.P., Mikhadarkina O.G., Nikitina V.A., Malivanova T.F., Dubova E.A., Lishchuk S.V., Pavlov K.A., Serova O.F.. |
||||
|
RADIATION |
39 |
Baranov L.I., Bushmanov A.Yu., Vasilev Е.V., Tsarev A.N., |
|||
|
46 |
Barchukov V.G., Bolotov A.A., Zhirnov Y.N., Samoylov A.S., |
||||
| RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY |
55 |
Chekin S.Yu., Gorski A.I., Maksioutov M.A., Karpenko S.V., Tumanov K.A., Shchukina N.V., Kochergina E.V. |
|||
|
|
66 |
Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Bulanova T.M., Bogdanenko N.A. |
|||
| RADIATION DIAGNOSTICS |
78 |
Bashkov A.N., Shabalin M.V., Veselkova A.Yu., Dubova E.A., Matkevich E.I., Dunaev A.P. |
|||
|
|
82 |
Avascular Necrosis and Bone Marrow Infarction as a Manifestation of Postcovoid Syndrome Zainagutdinova A.M., Surovtsev E.N., Pyshkina Yu.S., Kapishnikov A.V. |
|||
|
87 |
Nikolaeva E.A., Krylov A.S., Ryzhkov A.A., Narkevich B.Ya., Filimonov A.V. |
||||
|
RADIATION |
96 |
Medvedeva K.E., Adarova A.I., Minaeva N.G., Gulidov I.A., Koryakin S.N. |
|||
|
102 |
Efanova E.V., Startseva Zh.A., Fursov S.A., Chernyshova A..L, |
||||
|
NUCLEAR |
106 |
SPECT/CT with 99mTc-PSMA in the Staging and Diagnosis of Hodgkin Lymphoma Muravleva A.V., Chernov V.I., Goldberg V.E., Shamsimukhametova E.A., |
|||