JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 13–17
Comparative Evaluation оf the Anti-Radiation Efficacy of Flagellin
by Survival and Micronucleus Test
N.I. Lisina, K.Yu. Romanova, L.P. Sycheva, L.M. Rozhdestvensky
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Nina Ivanovna Lisina: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the domestic drug flagellin (development of the State Research Institute of High-Purity Biological Products, St. Petersburg) in an extended range of drug administration periods before and after irradiation, as well as evaluation of the possibility of using the micronucleus test as a biomarker of its effectiveness.
Material and methods: The work was performed on male ICR CD1 mice weighing 20–22g. The radioprotective effectiveness of flagellin was evaluated by the 30-day survival rate of experimental animals in comparison with control groups. The cytogenetic effect was evaluated by a micronucleus test in polychromatophilic erythrocytes (MJ-PCE) of mouse bone marrow. Irradiation was performed on the RUST M1 X-unit at a dose rate of 1.1 Gy/min in the dose range from 7 to 10 Gy for survival assessment and at a dose of 1 Gy for the micronucleus test. Flagellin was administered intraperitoneally at 0.2 mg/kg for 18 h and 30 min before irradiation, 10 and 30 min after irradiation. The animals of the control groups were injected with a solvent – phosphate-albumin buffer at the same time and in the same volume.
Results: The most effective was the use of flagellin for 30 min and 10 min in relation to radiation (survival at 8.5 Gy 92 % and 78 %, at 9 Gy 81 % and 55 %, respectively) with survival in the control 29 % and 0. In the most studied version of the introduction of flagellin 30 minutes before exposure, the FID values at the level of generally accepted estimates LD16, LD50, LD84, were 1.3; 1.2 and 1.2, respectively.
Conclusions: It is of interest to further expand the time range of the use of flagellin, especially after irradiation. The use of the method of estimating the proportion of polychromatophilic erythrocytes with micronuclei in the bone marrow allowed us to identify the optimal timing of drug administration much faster than in terms of survival (MJ-PCR test was performed 24 hours after irradiation). The MJ-PHE indicator can be considered as a potential biomarker of drug-induced increased radioresistance (this was previously shown in our studies for betaleukin, indralin, and riboxin).
Key words: anti-radiation drugs, flagellin, X-radiation, mice, radioprotective efficacy, micronucleus test, polychromatophilic erythrocytes
For citation: Lisina NI, Romanova KYu, Sycheva LP, Rozhdestvensky LM. Comparative Evaluation of the Anti-Radiation Efficacy
of Flagellin by Survival and Micronucleus Test. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(4):13-17.
DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-4-13-17
References
1. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Saint Petersburg: Rus-Lasa "NP association of specialists in working with laboratory animals" 2012, 48 p. (In Russian)
2. Guidelines for conducting preclinical studies of medicines. Part 1. M.: Grif and K. 2012. 944 p. (In Russian)
3. Heddle JA, Cimino MC, Hayashi M, et al. Micronuclei as an index of cytogenetic damage: past, present, and future. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 1991; 18: 277–291.
4. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals №474. Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test. Adopted 21st July 1997. 10 p.
5. Sycheva LP, Lisina NI, Shchegoleva RA, Rozhdestvensky LM. Antimutagenic effect of anti-radiation drugs in an experiment on mice. Radiation biology. Radioecology.2019; 59(4):388–393. (In Russian)
6. Burdelya LG, KrivokrysenkoVI, Tallant TC, et al. An agonist of toll-lair receiver 5 has radioprotective activity in mouse and primate models. Sciepse 2008; 320. (5873): 226–230. (In Russian)
7. Krivokrysenko VN, Shakhov AN, Gudkov AV, Feinstein E. Identification of G-CSF and IL-6 as candidate biomarkers of GBLB502 efficacy as a medical radiation countermeasure. JPET Fast Forward. 2012 P. 1-46. DOI: 0.1124/jpet.112.196071. (In Russian)
8. Grebenyuk AN, Aksenov KV, Petrov AV, etc. Obtaining various variants of recombinant flagellin and evaluating their radioprotective effectiveness. Medical Academic. Journal. 2017; 43(3);75-80. (In Russian)
9. Murzina EV, Sofronov GA, Aksenova NV, etc. Anti-radiation properties of bacterial flagellin. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2017; 36(2). Suppl 1: 242–243. (In Russian)
10. Murzina EV, Sofronov GA, Simbirtsev AS, et al. Evaluation of the radioprotective properties of recombinant flagellin when used separately or in combination with IL-1beta. Medical. Akademic. Journal. 2018; 18(3):77-84. (In Russian)
11. Murzina EV, Sofronov GA, Aksenova NV, et al. Experimental evaluation of the anti-radiation efficacy of recombinant flagellin. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2018; 3: 122–128. (In Russian)
12. Murzina EV, Sofronov GA, Aksenova NV, et al. Biotechnological preparations promising for the development of new anti-radiation agents. The Messenger Grew. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2017; 3: 133–136. (In Russian)
13. Sapozhnikov RYu, Khalimov Yu Sh, Legeza VI, etc. Preventive and curative efficacy of recombinant flagellin in acute radiation damage. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy, 2019; 67(3):141–144. (In Russian)
14. Lisina NI, Shchegoleva RA, Shlyakova TG, Zorin VV, Shkaev AE, Rozhdestvensky LM. Anti-radiation efficacy of flagellin in experiments on mie. Radiation biology. Radioecology.2019; 59(3):1–5. (In Russian)
15. Evaluation of the mutagenic activity of environmental factors in the cells of different mammalian organs by the micronucleus method. Methodological recommendations. Ed. Official. M., Interdepartmental Scientific Council for Ecology and Environmental Hygiene of the Russian Federation. 2001. p. 21.
16. Sycheva LP, Rozhdestvensky LM, Lisina NI, et al. Antimutagenic activity and hepatoprotective effect of anti-radiation drugs. Medical Genetics. 2020; 19(9): 81–82.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 16.03.2021.
Accepted for publication: 21.04.2021.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 18–24
Changes in the Cortex Neurons in Single and Fractional Gamma Radiation
I.B. Ushakov, V.P. Fyodorov
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Vladimir Petrovich Fyodorov: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: Comparative assessment of radiation-induced changes in neurons of the cerebral cortex after a single and fractionated exposure to ionizing radiation in doses of 0.1 – 1.0 Gy.
Material and methods. The study was carried out in compliance with the rules of bioethics on 180 white outbred male rats at the age of 4 months. by the beginning of the experiment, exposed to a single or fractionated exposure to γ-quanta of 60Co in total doses of 0.1; 0.2; 0.5 and 1.0 Gy. Neuromorphological and histochemical methods were used to assess morphometric and tinctorial parameters of nerve cells, as well as changes in the content of protein and nucleic acids in neurons in the early and late periods of the post-radiation period. Using one-way analysis of variance, a comparative assessment of neuromorphological indicators under various modes of radiation exposure is given.
Results: In the control and irradiated animals throughout their life, undulating changes in the indicators of the state of the neurons of the brain occur with a gradual decrease by the end of the experiment. Despite a number of features of the dynamics of neuromorphological parameters, these irradiation regimes do not cause functionally significant changes in the neurons of the cortex. However, in some periods of the post-radiation period, the changes under the studied irradiation regimes were multidirectional and did not always correspond to age control. Significant differences in the response of neurons to these modes of radiation exposure in the sensory and motor areas of the cerebral cortex have not been established.
Conclusion: No functionally significant radiation-induced changes in neurons were found either with single or fractionated irradiation. At the same time, different modes of irradiation in general caused the same type of changes in neurons. However, in some periods of observation, changes in neuromorphological parameters under the studied irradiation regimes were not unidirectional and differed from age control, which indicates a possible risk of disturbances in the functioning of the nervous system against the background of other harmful and dangerous factors.
Keywords: low doses of radiation, irradiation, brain, changes in neurons, rats
For citation: Ushakov IB, Fyodorov VP. Changes in the Cortex Neurons in Single and Fractional Gamma Radiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(4):18-24.
DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-4-18-24
References
1 Guskova AK Radiation and the Human Brain. Honey. Radiology and Radiation. Safety. 2001. 46(5): 47–55. (In Russian).
2 Legeza VI, Reznik VM, Pimburskiy VF. On the Peculiarities of the Long-term Dynamics of the Levels of Diseases of the Circulatory System in Servicemen who Liquidate the Consequences of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Med.-biol. and Social Psychology. Probl. Safety in Emergency Situations. 2016. V.1. P.34-40. (In Russian).
3 Nikiforov AM, Aleksanin SS, Chugunova LN Features of the Psychological Status and Medical and Psychological Rehabilitation of Participants in Emergency Recovery Work at the Chernobyl NPP. Medical Radiology and Radiation safety. 2002.47(5): 43–50. (In Russian).
4 Torubarov FS, Kuleshova MV, Lukyanova SN, Zvereva ZV Spectral Correlation Analysis of EEG in Liquidators of the Chernobyl Accident with Neurological Disorders. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019. 64(3): 40–45. (In Russian).
5 Ushakov IB, Fedorov VP, Gundarova OP Neuromorphological Correlates of Minor Radiation Effects. Med.-biol. and Social Psychology. Probl. safety in Emergency Situations. 2016. 1: 71–78. (In Russian).
6 Shamrey VK, Chistyakova EI, Matyshina EN et.al. Radiation Psychosomatic Illness Among Liquidators of the Consequences of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Med.-biol. and Social Psychology. Probl. Safety in Emergency Situations. 2016. 1: 21–33. (In Russian).
7 Fedorov VP, Ushakov IB, Fedorov NV Cerebral Effects in the Liquidators of the Chernobyl Accident. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Moscow, Publ, 2016. 390 с. (In Russian).
8 Aleksanin SS Pathogenetic Laws of the Formation of Somatic Pathology After Radiation Accidents in the Remote Period. Bull. Grew up. Military Medical Acad. 2008. 23(3): 10–13. (In Russian).
9 Buzunov VA The Main Results and Tasks of Epidemiological Studies of the Medical Consequences of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (Results of 4-year Observations). Vestn. Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR. 1991. 11: 36–39. (In Russian).
10 Ushakov IB, Fyodorov VP. Low Radiation Impacts and Brain. Voronezh: Nauchnayakniga. Moscow, Publ, 2015. 536 P. (In Russian).
11 Ushakov IB, Fedorov VP Neuromorphological Correlates of Prolonged Radiation Exposure. Med.-biol. and social Psychology. Probl. Safety in Emergency Situations. 2018. 3: 86–97. (In Russian).
12 Ushakov IB, Fyodorov VP, Sgibneva NV. The neuromorphological Correlation of Radiation Dose Rate. Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2019. 4: 59–69. (In Russian).
13 Radiation Effects. Voronezh: Scientific. book. Moscow, Publ, 2013. 256. (In Russian).
14 Sgibneva NV, Fyodorov VP, Gundarova OP, Maslov NV. Plasticity of Sensorimotor Cortex Neurons in Conditions of High Radiation Background. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017. 61(1): 20-26. (In Russian).
15 Fyodorov VP, Petrov AV, Stepanyan NA. Ecological Geomorphology. Classification of Typical Forms of Morphological Variability of the Central Nervous System Under the Action of Anthropogenic Factors. Journal of Theoretical and Practical Medicine. 2003. 1: 62–66. (In Russian).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 16.03.2021.
Accepted for publication: 21.04.2021.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 33–36
Current Issues of Providing the Personnel of the Radiation Hazardous Facilities
with Personal Protection Equipment Complying with the Requirements and Working Conditions
V.I. Rubtsov, A.B. Trebukhin, A.Yu. Nefedov, E.V. Klochkova,
I.V. Olenina , V.P. Zinoviev, A.N. Timoshenko, O.V. Isaev
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Rubtsov V.I. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The article covers issues related to the providing personal protection for the personnel of radiation hazardous facilities. Specific character of working conditions at the enterprises in the field of atomic energy use is caused by extremely high toxic level of radioactive substances and the fact that there is no human sense organ which can identify dangerous levels of radiation exposure. Establishment of mandatory requirements for manufacturing, identification and verification of personal protection equipment (PPE) in the field of atomic energy use is needed because using of low-quality PPE and PPE not complying with working conditions poses a risk for the health of workers. The article provides results of analysis of the regulatory frameworks, both current and under development, which set the requirements for PPE.
Results: Since 2017 Rosatom is executing plans for development of series of industry standards specifying requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use and methods of their testing. More than 25 interstate and national standards on PPE were included in the Summary list of standardization documents in the field of atomic energy use. PPE was included in the list of products subject to mandatory certification and having requirements for safety assurance in the field of atomic energy use specified.
Industry and national standards establishing requirements for PPE protecting from tritium, radioactive noble gases, radioactive iodine, high-toxic alpha-emitting radionuclides, as well as standards on methods of their testing are planned to be developed soon.
Conclusion: The system of standardizing requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use created by, together with existing system of certification of PPE in the field of atomic energy use will help to increase effectiveness of personal protection of the personnel at radiation and chemical hazardous facilities in nuclear industry.
Key words: personal protection equipment, radiation hazardous facilities, technical regulation system, standardization, certification, emergency situation
For citation: Rubtsov VI, Trebukhin AB, Nefedov AYu, Klochkova EV, Olenina IV, Zinoviev VP , Timoshenko AN, Isaev OV. Current Issues of Providing the Personnel of the Radiation Hazardous Facilities with Personal Protection Equipment Complying with the Requirements and Working Conditions. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(4):33-36.
DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-4-33-36
References
1. Radiation Medicine. Guidelines for Medical Researchers, Health Officials and Radiation Safety Professionals / Ed. Ilyin LA V. 3. Radiation Hygiene (In Russian).
2. Rubtsov VI, Klochkov VN, Surovtsev NA et al. Personal Protection Equipment for the Personnel of Nuclear Industry and Energetics Enterprisesю Reference Manual / Ed. Rubtsov VI Approved for Publication by the General Inspectorate of Rosatom State Corporation. 4rd Edition, Revised. Moscow, MOU IIF, 2020, 252 p. (In Russian).
3. Rubtsov VI, Klochkov VN In Celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the Laboratory of the Personal Protection Equipment for the Personnel of Hazardous Production Facilities. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013;58(5):75-81. (In Russian).
4. Rubtsov VI, Klochkov VN, Surovtsev NA, et al. Improvement of Radiation Protection of the Medical Staff During Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures With use of Radionuclides and Sources of Ionizing Radiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2016;61(1):17-21. (In Russian).
5. Federal Law of 30.12.2001 No. 197-FZ. Labour Code of the Russian Federation. (In Russian).
6. Federal Law of 30.03.1999 No. 52-FZ “On Sanitary and Epidemiologic Well-Being of the Population”. (In Russian).
7. Technical Regulation of the Customs Union TRCU 019/2011 “On Safety of the Personal Protection Equipment”. Approved by the Decision of the Customs Union Commission of 09.12.2011 No. 878 . (In Russian).
8. Agreement of 25.01.2008 “On following a consistent policy in the area of technical Regulation, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures”, in Edition of the Protocol of 19.05.2011 Amended by the Agreement of 10.10.2014 . (In Russian).
9. Federal Law of 29.06.2015 No. 162-FZ “On Standardization in the Russian Federation” . (In Russian).
10. Federal Law of 27.12.2002 No. 184-FZ “On Technical Regulation” . (In Russian).
11. Federal Law of 21.11.1995 No. 170-FZ “On Atomic Energy Use” . (In Russian).
12. The RF Government Resolution of 12.07.2016 No. 669 “On approval of the Regulation on Standardization in Relation to Products (Works, Services) for Which Requirements are Established Related to Ensuring Safety in the Field of Atomic Energy use, as Well as Processes and Other Standardization Objects Associated With such Products”. (In Russian).
13. The RF Government Resolution of 23.04.2013 No. 362 “On specifics of Technical Regulation in Terms of the Development and Establishment by State Customers, Federal Executive Bodies Authorized in the Field of State Governance of the Atomic Energy use and State Regulation of Safety at the Atomic Energy use, and the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom" Mandatory Requirements for Products, for Which Requirements are Established Related to Ensuring Safety in the field of Atomic Energy use, as Well as Processes of Engineering (Including Research), Manufacturing, Construction, Installation, Commissioning, Operation, Storage, Transportation, Sale, Utilization and Disposal of these Products”. (In Russian).
14. The RF Government Resolution of 15.06.2016 No. 544 “On Specifics of Conformity Assessment for Products, for Which Requirements are Established Related to Ensuring Safety in the Field of Atomic Energy use, as Well as Processes of their Engineering (Including Research), Manufacturing, Construction, Installation, Commissioning, Operation, Storage, Transportation, Sale, Utilization and Disposal”. (In Russian).
15. The RF Government Resolution of 20.07.2013 No. 612 “On accreditation in the Field of Atomic Energy use”. (In Russian).
16. Order of the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of 04.12.2018 No. 599 “On Amending the List of Products Which are Subject to Mandatory Certification and for which Requirements are Established Related to Ensuring Safety in the Field of Atomic Energy use, Approved by the Order of the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of 21 July 2017 No. 277”. (In Russian).
17. Decision of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 06.03.2018 No. 37 “On Amending the Decision of the Customs Union Commission of 9 December 2011 No. 878”. (In Russian).
18. GOST R 54597-2011/ISO/TR 27628:2007. Workplace Atmospheres. Ultrafine Aerosols, Nanoparticle and Nano-Structured Aerosols. Inhalation Exposure Characterization and Assessment. (In Russian).
19. GOST R 56541-2015. Conformity Assessment. General Rules for Product Identification for the Assessment (Confirmation) of Compliance with the Requirements of the Technical Regulations of the Customs Union . (In Russian).
20. GOST 24297-2013. Verification of Purchased Products. Organization of Conducting and Control Methods. (In Russian).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 23.12.2020.
Accepted for publication: 20.01.2021.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 25–32
Radiation Safety of Population: Experience and Ways of Improvement
N.K. Shandala, I.P. Korenkov, A.M. Lyaginskaya, S.M. Kiselev, Yu.E. Kvacheva, E.G.Metlyaev,
O.V. Parinov, A.V. Titov, M.P. Semenova, Yu.N. Zozul, N.V. Zinovieva
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Natalia Kostantinovna Shandala: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
The article describes the results of the activities of the department of radiation safety of the population of the A.I. Burnasyan FMBC of FMBA over the period from the foundation of the Center to the present.
Results: The priority in the activity of the Institute of Biophysics, created in 1946, was the development of issues of radiation safety of the personnel and the public during the implementation of a nuclear project. The basic scientific direction «radiation safety of the population» was formed as an independent unit by 1955. Today, the department of radiation safety of the population of FMBC is a scientific, practical and methodological unit which deals with radiation and chemical safety including an assessment of health of the population living in the vicinity of Russian nuclear facilities. The main priorities of activity include: radiation-health physics monitoring and health physics regulation; monitoring the health of the population; expert activity in medical nuclear forensics. Scientific research in the field of protection and safety and improving the state health and epidemiological supervision covers the population living in the areas of enterprises under FMBA’s of Russia service, including nuclear shipbuilding facilities, nuclear and uranium legacy of Russia and Central Asia, nuclear power plants, cosmodromes, etc.
Conclusion: In general, summarizing the 75-year activity in the field of the public radiation protection and safety, the following can be stated. Over the past years, a set of health physics works has been carried out at nuclear facilities, a methodology for radiation and health physics monitoring has been developed in conjunction with monitoring the public health, methods for determining man-made and natural radionuclides in food and environmental media have been developed and introduced into practice. The implementation of our new scientific developments and future prospects will be aimed at reducing the burden of medical problems associated with the operation of various radiation hazardous facilities and legacy management; raising the level and quality of life of the relevant contingents of the Russian population; as well as the creation of the necessary conditions for the successful development of nuclear energy in the Russian Federation.
Key words: population, radiation safety, health physics monitoring, health physics regulation, Chernobyl accident, protective measures
For citation: Shandala NK, Korenkov IP, Lyaginskaya AM, Kiselev SM, Kvacheva YuE, Metlyaev EG, Parinov OV, Titov AV,
Semenova MP, Zozul YuN, Zinovieva NV. Radiation Safety of Population: Experience and Ways of Improvement. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(4):25-32.
DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-4-25-32
References
1. Guidelines for Sanitary Control Over the Content of Radioactive Substances in Environmental Objects / ed. Marey AN and Zykova AS, Moscow Publ, 1974. 337 p. (In Russian).
2. Kraevsky NA. Essays on the Pathological Anatomy of Radiation Sickness. Medgiz, Moscow Publ, 1957. 230 p. (In Russian).
3. Global Fallout of Cesium-137 and man / Marey AN, Barkhudarov RM Novikova NYa, Moscow Publ, Atomizdat, 1974, 168 p. (In Russian).
4. Marey AN, Zykova AS, Saurov YuM. Radiation Communal Hygiene. Moscow Publ, Energoatomizdat 1984.176 p. (In Russian).
5. Marey AN, Zykova AS, Saurov YuM. Radiation Communal Hygiene. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, Publ, 1984. 176 p. (In Russian).
6. Fedorova MV, Krasnopolsky VI, Lyaginskaya AM Reproductive Health of Women and Offspring in Regions with Radioactive Contamination (Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident) Monograph, ed. Fedorova MV. Moscow, Medicine, Publ, 1997. 393 p. (In Russian).
7. Shandala NK, Korenkov IP, Kotenko KV, Novikova NYa Global and Emergency Fallouts of 137Cs and 90Sr. Moscow, Medicine, Publ, 2009. 208 p.
8. Ilyin LA, Shandala NK, Savkin MN et al. The place and Role of Radiation-hygienic Monitoring in the System of Social-hygienic Monitoring // Hygiene and Sanitation, Moscow Publ, 2004:(5):9–15 (In Russian).
9. MU 2.6.1.1868-04 Implementation of Radiation Safety Indicators on the State of Environmental Objects, incl. Food raw Materials and food Products, in the System of Social and Hygienic Monitoring. (In Russian).
10. MU 2.6.5.076-2015 Monitoring of the State of the Environment at the Stages of the NPP life Cycle. (In Russian).
11. MU 2.6.5.032-2014 Expert and Predictive Assessments of the Health Status of the Population in the Areas Where Nuclear Power Plants are located. (In Russian).
12. Shandala NK, Kiselev SM, Titov AV Scientific and Practical Experience of Supervisory Activities in the Field of Ensuring the Protection of the Population and the Environment at Nuclear Heritage sites in Russia. Radiation Hygiene. 2019.12(2) (special issue):83–96. p. (In Russian).
13. Shandala NK, Titov AV, Metlyaev EG. Problems of Emergency Regulation of the Content of Radionuclides in Food: the Transition From Temporarily Permissible levels to Normal practice. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2016.61(3):98–102(In Russian).
14. Metlyaev EG, Bogdanova LS, Grachev MI and Others. International and Domestic Approaches to Iodine Prophylaxis in the Event of a Nuclear Reactor Accident. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020.65(3):66–72.
15. Volgodonsk NPP and Public Health. Ed. Academician of the RAMS Ilyina LA and Ph.D. Murina MB. Moscow Publ, GNTs-IBF. 2002. 62 p. (In Russian).
16. Shandala NK, Korenkov IP, Romanov V.V. The State of the Radiation-hygienic Situation in the area of the NPP location. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015.60(2):15–21. (In Russian).
17. Kvacheva YuE, Glazunov AG Features of the organization and production of forensic medical examination of corpses of persons who Died From Acute Radiation Sickness. Forensic Medical Examination. 2012. 55(2):43–45. (In Russian).
18. Titov AV, Shandala NK, Isaev DV and Others. Assessment of the Radiation Hazard of the stay of the Population and the Conduct of Economic Activity in the area of the location of a Depleted Uranium Deposit. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020.65(2):11–16.
19. Isaev DV, Shandala NK, Starinskiy VG et.al. Assessment of the Radiation Situation in the area of the location of the Ship Repair Enterprises of the Kamchatka Territory. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019.64 (5):9–14 (In Russian).
20. Lyaginskaya AM, Shandala NK, Kiselev SM and Others. The State of Health of the Population in the Area of the location of the Shipyard "Nerpa", Carrying out Work on the Disposal of the nuclear legacy Object - the Floating Technical Base "Lepse". Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020.65(3):31–39. (In Russian).
21. Shandala NK, Sneve MK, Semenova MP, Segien K, Filonova AA. Cooperation Between State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency and Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020; 65(1):72–78. (In Russian).
22. Petoyan I.M., Lyaginskaya A.M., Ermalitsky A.P. et al. Reproductive Health Status of the Kursk NPP Personnel. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019.64(1):21–25. (In Russian).
23. Grachev MI, Ilyin LA, Kvacheva YuE et al. Medical Aspects of Countering Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism / Ed. L.A. Ilyin. Moscow, FGBU GNTs FMBC im. A.I. Burnazyan FMBA of Russia, 2018. 392 p. ISBN 978-5-905926-57-0.
24. Forensic Medicine: National leadership / Ed. YuI. Pigolkin. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 576 p. ISBN 978-5-9704-4236-4.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 16.03.2021.
Accepted for publication: 21.04.2021.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 4. P. 37–41
Enhancing the Regulatory Support of Occupational Radiation Protection
during Decommissioning and Dismantling of Ships with Nuclear Power Installations
and Nuclear Service Vessels
A.V. Simakov1, D.V. Arefeva2, Y.V. Abramov1, N.L. Proskuryakova1, I.A. Kemskiy3, A.A. Shayahmetova2
1A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
2Scientific Research Institute of Industrial and Marine Medicine Saint-Petersburg, Russia
3Inter-Regional Management No 120 (IRM-120), Snezhnogorsk, Murmansk Region, Russia
Contact person: Yuri Viktorovich Abramov: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Results: Information is provided on the developed regulatory and methodological documents including health physics and organizational requirements for the radiation safety and protection supervision in the course of work on decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear submarines, nuclear service ships and surface vessels with nuclear installations, as well as during storage of reactor compartments of decommissioned nuclear submarines and block packs of nuclear service ships.
Conclusion: The developed documents are aimed at further improving the regulatory legal and methodological support of citizens’ rights to safe working conditions, health protection and social protection.
Key words: nuclear submarines, surface ships with nuclear installations, decommissioning, dismantling, radiation situation, normative documents
For citation: Simakov AV, Arefeva DV, Abramov YV, Proskuryakova NL, Kemskiy IA, Shayahmetova AA. Enhancing the Regulatory Support of Occupational Radiation Protection during Decommissioning and Dismantling of Ships with Nuclear Power Installations and Nuclear Service Vessels. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety 2021;66(4):37-41.
DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-4-37-41
References
1. Simakov AV, Kochetkov OA, Abramov YV, Vasuchno VP, Netecha ME. Problems in Radiation Safety Assuring Under Abnormal Conditions. In Internat. Sci. Pract. Conf. “Current Challenges in Public Radiation Protection” St.-Petersburg, 2006: 71-73. (In Russian).
2. Simakov AV, Kocetkov OA, Abramov YV. Special Features of Operation of SNF and RW Sites of Temporary Storage at Sevrao Facilities № 1and № 2. In. Internat. Conf. «Radioecology and Environmental Radioactivity». Bergen, Norway, 2008:75-77.
3. Ioyrysh AI, Kozodubov AA, Markarov BG, Chopornyak AB. Regulatory and Legal Support of Safety during Decommissioning of Nuclear and Radiation Hazardous Facilities of the Russian Nuclear Fleet. Moscow, Nauka Publ, 2008. 204 p. (In Russian).
4. Ivanchenko AV, Natha SV, Shayahmetova AA, Arefeva DV. Investigation of Factors Impacting on the Radiation Situation Generation During the Decommissioning and Dismantling of Nuclear Marine Technological Vessels Radiation Hygiene. 2013.6(4):19-22 (In Russian).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 23.12.2020.
Accepted for publication: 20.01.2021.