JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Issues journals

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 71–74

Total Brain Irradiation for Metastatic Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients

A.S. Balkanov, V.В. Metelin, I.A. Vasilenko

M. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow Russia 

Contact person: Andrey Sergeevich Balkanov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract 

Purpose: Brain metastasis (BM) has a significant negative impact on the survival of breast cancer patients. An intensive search is underway for a multi-modal approach to identify the most effective methods of treating such patients. 

Material and methods: The study included 40 patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with BM on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Total brain irradiation (TBI) up to 30 Gy (3 Gy) was used as the main treatment method. The median age was 48 (31–70) years. In 75 % of cases, a nonluminal subtype of breast cancer was found, in 57.5 % of cases–T2 breast cancer, in 70 % of cases–N0-1.

Results: The median survival after TBI was 12 months, 6-month survival rate was 70 %, and 12 – month survival rate was 47.5 %. The risk of death was significantly increased (HR=3.309; 95 % CI: 1,184 – 9,250, p=0.023) in patients whose time interval from the manifestation of 1 relapse to BM was ≤24 months. In these patients, the survival was only 9.5 months and was significantly lower (p=0.0136) than in the patients with the same time interval was >24 months – 30 months.

Conclusions: It was found that the effectiveness of total brain irradiation in patients with breast cancer brain metastasis is the highest if the time interval from the moment of manifestation of first relapse to brain metastasis is more than 24 months.

Keyword: breast cancer, brain metastases, total brain irradiation, time interval to brain metastasis, survival

For citation: Balkanov AS, Metelin VВ, Vasilenko IA. Total Brain Irradiation for Metastatic Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(6):71–74.

DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-71-74

References

1. Cheng Y, Yan Y, Gong J, Yang N, Nie S. Trends in Incidence and Mortality of Female Breast Cancer During Transition in Central China. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018;10:6247-6255. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S182510. 

2. Тorre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J. Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65;2:87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262.

3. Lee ES, Jung SY, Kim JY, Kim JJ, Yoo TK, Kim YG, Lee KS, Lee ES, Kim EK, Min JW, Han W, Noh DY, Moon HG. Identifying the Potential Long-Term Survivors among Breast Cancer Patients with Distant Metastasis. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27;5:828-833.

4. Mariotto AB, Zou Z, Zhang F, Howlader N, Kurian AW, Etzioni R. Can We Use Survival Data from Cancer Registries to Learn about Disease Recurrence? The Case of Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27;11:1–10. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1129.

5. Barnhoitz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, et al. Incidence Proportions of Brain Metastases in Patients Diagnosed (1973-2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance System. JCO. 2004;22;14:2865–2872.

6. Tham YL, Sexton K, Kramer R, Hilsenbeck S, Elledge R. Primary Breast Cancer Phenotypes Associated with Propensity for Central Nervous System Metastases. Cancer. 2006;107;4:696-704.

7. Bastos DCA, Maldaun MVC, Sawaya R, Suki D, Lang FF, Brown PD, Rao G, Weinberg JS, Prabhu SS. Biological Subtypes and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases in the Targeted Therapy Era. Neuro-Oncol. Pract. 2018;5;3:161-169. doi: 10.1093/nop/npx033.

8. Brosnan EM, Anders CK. Understanding Patterns of Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer and Designing Rational Therapeutic Strategies. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018;6;9:163. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.35.

9. Polivka JJr, Kralickova M, Polivka J, Kaiser C, Kuhn W, Golubnitschaja O. Mystery of the Brain Metastatic Disease in Breast Cancer Patients: Improved Patient Stratification, Disease Prediction and Targeted Prevention on the Horizon? EPMA J. 2017;8;2:119-127. doi: 10.1007/s13167-017-0087-5.

10. Berghoff AS, Bargo-Horvath Z, IIhan-Mutlu A, et al. Brain Only Metastatic Breast Cancer Is a Distinct Clinical Entity Characterized by Favorable Median Overall Survival Time and a High Rate of Long-Term Survival. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;107;9:1454–1458.

11. Ibrahim H, Yaroko AA. Palliative External Beam Radiotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis in the University College Hospital Ibadan. Ann. Afr. Med. 2019;18;3:127-131. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_42_18.

12. Duchnowska R, Jassem J, Goswami C, et al. Predicting Early Brain Metastases Based on Clinicopathological Factors and Gene Expression Analisis in Advanced HER2-Positive Cancer Patients. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;122;1:205–216.

13. Banov SM, Galanov AV, Zaitsev AM, Bekyashev AKh, Vetlovana ER, Durgaryan AA. Metastatic Brain Damage, Modern Treatment Standards. Russian Medical Journal. 2017:16.1181-1185 (In Russ.) [Банов С.М., Голанов А.В., Зайцев А.М., Бекяшев А.Х., Ветлована Е.Р., Дургарян А.А. Метастатическое поражение головного мозга, современные стандарты лечения // РМЖ. 2017. № 16. С. 1181-1185.].

14. Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, Sneed PK, Chao ST, Weil RJ, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Кnisely JPS, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta M. Summary Report on the Graded Prognostic Assessment: an Accurate and Facile Diagnosis-Specific Tool to Estimate Survival for Patients with Brain Metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30;4:419–425. doi: 10.1200/JCO. 2011.38.0527.

15. Janssen S, Hansen HC, Dziggel L, Schild SE, Rades D. A New Instrument for Predicting Survival of Patients with Cerebral Metastases From Breast Cancer Developed in a Homogeneously Treated Cohort. Radiol. Oncol. 2019;53;2:219-224. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0020.

16. Zhang N, Li Q, Xu B, Yuan P, Ma F, Wang J, Fan Y. Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Clinical and Prognostic Characteristics of Different Biological Subtypes. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014;36;9: 697–702. 

17. Badiyan SN, Regine WF, Mehta M. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Brain Metastases. J. Oncol. Pract. 2016;12;8:703-712. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.012922.

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 07.06.2021. 

Accepted for publication: 20.09.2021.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 75–80

The Comparison of the Results of Ultrasound, CT and MRI in the Diagnosis
of Angiomyolipoma Kidneys, Including Complicated by Development
of the Syndrome Wunderlich

N.S. Vorotyntseva1, M.V. Gaidukova2

1Kursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia. 

2Clinic Expert Tver, Tver, Russia

Contact person: Natalia Sergeevna Vorotyntseva, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract 

Purpose: Analysis the effectiveness of various methods of radiation studies for the detection of renal angiomyolipomas (RAMLs), including the diagnosis of Wunderlich syndrome.

Material and methods: The analysis of the results of a comprehensive radiation study of the kidneys of 115 patients who were diagnosed with focal formation in primary renal ultrasound was carried out. Further, of those 115 people, 47 patients underwent MRI of the kidneys, 60 patients – CT and 8 patients complex MRI+CT, including contrast-enhanced vasculature.

Results and discussion: Angiomyolipoma was detected by ultrasound in 38 (33.0 %) of 115 patients, and according to MRI and CT in total in 27 (23.5 %) patients. Coincidence of ultrasound findings and MRI and CT results was in 18 patients. Consequently, the sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of RAML was compared with MRI – 45 %; when compared with CT – 42.8 %, and specificity – 55 % and 57.1 %, respectively. Reliable signs of RAML in ultrasound were hyperechogenic homogeneous structure, clear smooth contours of the formation. The rounded form of education is statistically unreliable. Statistically significant characteristics of RAML in magnetic resonance imaging are heterogeneous structure, heterogeneous hyperintense MR-signal on T1 and heterogeneously hypointensity on T2-weighted images, always uniformly hypo-Fs for T1 / T2 Fs, with hypo clear boundary between education and renal parenchyma on T1 in the opp phase. Reliable signs of RAML with CT are non-uniform structure of education, with non-uniform x-ray density. 

Conclusion: Ultrasound diagnosis is necessary for screening kidney disease, while CT and MRI have greater sensitivity and specificity to determine the nature of focal formation. With the development of Wunderlich’s syndrome, a complex of radiological methods, including ultrasound, MRI and CT, allows to diagnose the cause of hemorrhage, as well as to obtain complete diagnostic information necessary for the surgeon to plan treatment.

Keywords: benign tumors, CT, kidney, MRI, renal neoplasms, sonography, angiomyolipoma. Wunderlich’s syndrome

For citation: Vorotyntseva NS, Gaidukov MV. The Comparison of the Results of Ultrasound, CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Angiomyolipoma Kidneys, Including Complicated by Development of the Syndrome Wunderlich. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(6):75–80.

DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-75-80

References

1. Eble JN. Angiomyolipoma of the Kidney. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 1998;15:21–40.

2. Sparks D, Chase D, Thomas D, et al. The Wunderlich's Syndrome Secondary to Massive Bilateral Angiomyolipomas Associated with Advanced Tuberous Sclerosis. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2011;22;3:534-537.

3. Kyo C, Won-Tae K, Won-Sik H, et al. Trends of Presentation and Clinical Outcome of Treated Renal Angiomyolipoma. Yonsei Med. J. 2010;51;5:728–734.

4. Alyaev YuG, Shpot EV, Mosyakova KM. Practical Observation: the Treatment of Kidney Angiomyolipoma Sporadic Origin. RMJ. 2016;8:495-497 (In Russian).

5. Ahmad M, Arora M, Reddu R, Rizvi I. Wunderlich’s Syndrome (Spontaneous Renal Haemorrhage). BMJ Case Reports. 2012;2012:bcr2012006280. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-006280.

6. Katabathina VS, Katre R, Prasad SR, et al. Wunderlich Syndrome: Cross-Sectional Imaging Review. J. Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35;4:425-433.

7. Santos SC, Duarte L, Valério F, Constantino J, Pereira J, Casimiro C. Wunderlich’s Syndrome, or Spontaneous Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage, in a Patient with Tuberous Sclerosis and Bilateral Renal Angiomyolipoma. The American Journal of Case Reports. 2017;18:1309-1314. doi:10.12659/AJCR.905975.

8. Moratalla MB. Wunderlich’s Syndrome Due to Spontaneous Rupture of Large Bilateral Angiomyolipomas. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2009;26:72.

9. Krutskevich AO. Angiomyolipoma: Mordern Concepts and a Rewiev of Two Clinical Cases. Medical Visualization. Ed. Krutskevich A.O., Sheykh Zh.V. 2014;2:P. 81-89 (In Russ.).

10. Korchagin OYu, Nechiporenko NA. Tactics of Management of Patients with Kidney Angiomyolipoma. Journal of GrSMU. 2006;2;14:81-83 (In Russian).

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 07.06.2021. 

Accepted for publication: 20.09.2021.

 

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 93–98

Determination of Monitor Doses in Neutron  Therapy  Using the U-120 Cyclotron

V. А. Lisin

Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Tomsk, Russia

Contact person: Valery Andreevich Lisin, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract 

Purpose Analyze the various methods for determining the monitor doses in neutron therapy using the U-120 cyclotron and to choose the monitoring method that provides the highest accuracy in dose delivery to the tumor.

Material and methods  The distributions of the absorbed dose of the therapeutic beam from the U-120 cyclotron were measured in a tissue-equivalent medium using the differential method, in which two ionization chambers with different sensitivity to neutron radiation were used. A comparison of radiation effects on tissues using various techniques of determining the monitor doses was made. The linear-quadratic model was used to assess responses to ionizing radiation. 

Results  Dosimetry studies revealed that the therapeutic beam of the U-120 cyclotron contains concomitant gamma radiation, the contribution of which to the total neutron-photon dose increases with increasing depth of the irradiated medium. The presence of gamma radiation in the neutron beam dictate the need to find the correct method for monitoring neutron therapy. A comparison of radiation effects on the tumor tissue using different techniques of determining the monitor doses was made.  It was found that at equal neutron-photon doses, the neutron dose in the tumor changed depending on its depth. It can lead to an incorrect conclusion about the effectiveness of neutron therapy depending on a single dose as well as in relation to various dose fractionation schedules. 

 Conclusion  The analysis of the results obtained showed that the problem can be most accurately solved using a technique in which the monitor coefficient and monitor doses are determined from the distribution of the neutron dose, taking into account the contribution of the gamma radiation dose to the total neutron-photon dose. 

Key words: neutron therapy, monitor doses, linear quadratic model

For citation: Lisin VА. Determination of Monitor Doses in Neutron  Therapy  Using the U-120 Cyclotron. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(6):93–98.

DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-93-98

References

1. Zyryanov B.N., Afanasyev S.G., Zavyalov A.A., Musabayeva L.I. Intraoperative radiation therapy. - Tomsk. 1999.277 p. 

2. Musabayeva L.I., Zhogina Zh. A., Slonimskaya E.M., Lisin V.A. Modern methods of radiation therapy. - Tomsk. 2003.199 p. 

3. Musabayeva L.I., Lisin V.A., Startseva Zh.A., Gribova O.V. et al. Neutron therapy using the U-120 cyclotron // Medical Radiology and Radiation. Safety. 2013. V. 58. No. 2. P. 53-61.

4. Wagner F. M., Specht H., Loeper-Kabasakal B., Breitkreutz H.  The current state of fast neutron therapy // Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2015. No. 6. P. 5-11.

5. Gulidov I. A., Mardynsky Yu. S., Tsyb A. F., Sysoev A. S. Neutrons of nuclear reactors in the treatment of malignant neoplasms. - Obninsk: Publishing house of MRRC RAMS. 2001.132 p. 

6. Vazhenin A. V., Rykovanov G. N. Ural center of neutron therapy: history of creation, methodology, results of work. - M .: Publishing house of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2008.124 p. 

7. Kandakova E. Yu. Clinical and experimental substantiation of increasing the efficiency of combined photon-neutron therapy of head and neck tumors. - Doctoral dissertation. Moscow. 2015.197 p. 

8. Shalnov M.I. Tissue dose of neutrons. –M: Atomizdat. 1960. 218 p. 

9. Bregadze Yu. I. Methods of measuring the absorbed dose of neutron radiation by the ionization method. - Moscow. 1989. 20 p.

10. Lisin V.A., Gorbatenko A.I. Heterogeneous ionization chambers for dosimetry of mixed fields of fast neutrons and gamma radiation.- Instruments and experimental techniques. 1989. No. 6. P.71-73. 

11. Kondratjeva A.G., Kolchuzhkin A.M., Lisin V.A., Tropin I.S. Properties of Absorbed Dose distribution in heterogeneous Media // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2006. Т. 41, № 1. С. 527-530.

12. Lisin V.A. Estimation of the parameters of the linear-quadratic model in neutron therapy // Medical Physics. 2010. V.48. No. 4. P. 5 - 12. 

13. Lisin VA Linear-quadratic model in planning neutron therapy using the U-120 cyclotron // Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018. V. 63.No. 5. P. 41 – 47.  

14. Lisin V.A. On the choice of the ratio of doses of neutrons and photons in neutron-photon therapy of malignant neoplasms. // Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2019. V. 64, No. 6. p. 57–63. 

15. Lisin V.A., Musabayeva L.I. Quantitative assessment of radiation-induced reactions of tumors taking into account their radiobiological parameters. // Medical Radiology, 1983, V. 28, P. 65-69. 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The author declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. The article was prepared by one author.

Article received: 07.06.2019. 

Accepted for publication: 20.09.2021.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 81–92

Possibilities of Local Microwave Hyperthermia in Oncology

O.K. Kurpeshev

Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Hyperthermia, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Contact person: Orazakhmet Kerimbaevich Kurpeshev, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

CONTENTS

The review analyzes the features of the interaction of electromagnetic (EM) energy with various tissues and the temperature distribution in model, experimental and clinical studies from emitters for external and intracavitary microwave hyperthermia (MWHT). The effect of MWHT on the antitumor efficacy of radiation (RT) and / or chemotherapy (CT), as well as toxic effects on normal tissues, was studied. Based on the literature data and our own experience, some approaches to the treatment of cancer patients have been identified. The general principles of the method, the design features of the applicators and their role in creating a hyperthermic regime in tumors of superficial and subsurface localization are also considered. The development of methods for thermometric control and supply of the EM field, allowing relatively uniform heating of tumors, as well as the determination of the minimum effective thermal doses, remains a priority area of research both in MW and other hyperthermia methods.

Based on the literature data and our own experience, some approaches to the treatment of cancer patients have been identified.

Keywords: hyperthermia, microwave radiation, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, thermoradiotherapy,  thermochemoradiation therapy

For citation: Kurpeshev OK. Possibilities of Local Microwave Hyperthermia in Oncology. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(6):81–92.

DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-81-92

References

1. Yarmonenko SP, Wainson AA. Radiobiology of humans and animals. –M.: Publishing house “Higher School”. 2004. 549 pp. (In Russ.).

2. Kurpeshev OK, Tsyb AF, Mardynsky YuS, Berdov BA. Development mechanisms and ways to overcome tumor chemoresistance. Part 2. The role of the relationship of stroma and parenchyma in the effectiveness of chemotherapy. Russian Oncological J. 2003;1:50–2. (In Russ.). 

3. Chaffer CL, Brueckmann I, Scheel C, Kaestli AJ, Wiggins PA, Rodrigues LO,  Brooks M,  Reinhardt F,  Su Y,  Polyak K,  Arendt LM,  Kuperwasser C,  Bierie B,  Weinberg RA. Normal and Neoplastic Nonstem Cells Can Spontaneously Convert to a Stem-Like State. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). 2011;108(19):7950–5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102454108.

4. Heddleston JM, Li Z, Lathia JD, Bao S, Hjelmeland AB, Rich JN. Hypoxia Inducible Factors in Cancer Stem Cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2010;102(5):789–95. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605551.

5. Van der Heijden AG, Dewhirst MW. Effects of Hyperthermia in Neutralizing Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Non-Muscleinvasive Bladder Cancer. Int. J. Hyperthermia. 2016;32(4):434–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2016.1155761.

6. Ohguri T. Current Status of Clinical Evidence for Electromagnetic Hyperthermia on Prospective Trials. Thermal Med. 2015;31(2):5–12.

7. Kurpeshev OK, van der Zee J. Analysis of the Results of Randomized Studies of Hyperthermia in Oncology. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(3):52–67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/article_5b179d60437d54.24079640.

8. Pankratov VA, Andreev VG, Rozhnov VA, Gulidov IA, Baryshev VV, Buyakova ME, Vdovina SN, Kurpeshev OK, Podlesnykh NI. Simultaneous use of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Self-Conservative and Combined Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced Cancer of the Larynx and Laryngopharynx. Siberian J. Oncology. 2007;1:18–22. (In Russ.).

9. Kurpeshev OK. Patterns of the Radiosensitizing and Damaging Effects of Hyperthermia on Normal and Tumor Tissues. Author’s abstract. diss. PhD, MD. Obninsk, 1989. 35 pp. (In Russ.). 

10. Kurpeshev OK, Van der Zee J. The Experimental Basis for the Use of Hyperthermia in Oncology. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(1):57-77. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/article_5a8556b4be3e24.36808227. 

11. Abe M, Hiraoka M, Takahashi MI, Egawa S, Matsuda C, Onoyama Y, Morita K, Kakehi M, Sugahara T. Multi-Institutional Studies on Hyperthermia Using an 8-MHz Radiofrequency Capacitive Heating Device (Thermotron RF-8) in Combination With Radiation for Cancer Therapy. Cancer 1986;58(8):1589–95. 

12. Kurpeshev OK, van der Zee J. Locoregional Hyperthermia of Malignant Tumors Methods, Thermometry, Equipment. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2017;62(5):53–63. (In Russ.). DOI 10.12737/article_59f30321207ef4.88932385.

13. Johnson CC, Guy AW. Nonionizing Electromagnetic Wave Effects in Biological Materials and Systems. Proceedings of IEEE. 1972;60(6):692–718.

14. Trefná H.D., Crezee H., Schmidt M, Marder D, Lamprecht U, Ehmann M, Nadobny J, Hartmann J, Lomax N, Abdel-Rahman S, Curto S, Bakker A, Hurwitz MD, Diederich CJ, Stauffer PR, Van Rhoon GC. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Superficial Hyperthermia Clinical Trials: I. Clinical requirements. Int J Hyperthermia, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2016.1277791

15. Kok HP, De Greef M, Correia D, Vorde Sive Vording Zum, Van Stam PJ. Gelvich EA, Bel A, Crezee J. FDTD Simulations to Assess the Performance of CFMA-434 Applicators for Superficial Hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009;25: 462-476.

16. Kok HP, Cressman ENK., Ceelen W, Brace CL, Ivkov R, Grüll H. ter Haarj G, Wustk P, Crezeea J. Heating Technology for Malignant Tumors: a Review. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1): 711-741. doi:10.1080/02656736.2020.1779357.

17. Guirado FN, Martinez JC, Sanchez AF. Hipertermia Oncológica Profunda Conformada Provocada por Campos Electromagnéticos No Ionizantes. Conformed Deep Oncologic Hyperthermia Caused by Electromagnetic Fields. Rev. Fis. Med. 2018;19(1):11–44.

18. Kok HP, Correia D, de Greef M, Van Stam G, Bel A, Crezee J. SAR Deposition by Curved CFMA-434 Applicators for Superficial Hyperthermia: Measurements and Simulations. Int J Hyperthermia. 2010;26(2):171–84.

19. De Bruijne M, Wielheesen DHM., Van der Zee J, Chavannes N, Van Rhoon GC. Benefits of Superficial Hyperthermia Treatment Planning: Five Case Studies. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23(5):417–29.

20. Petrovich Z, Debicki P, Astrahan MA, Baert L. Clinical Practice of Intracavitary Thermoradiotherapy. Thermoradiotherapy and Thermochemotherapy Volume 2: Clinical Applications 1996. P. 263–74.

21. Roos DI, Seegenschmiedt MH, Sorbe B. Intracavitary Heating Technologies. In: Seegenschmiedt MH, Fessenden P, Vernon CC. (eds). Thermoradiotherapy and Thermochemotherapy. Medical Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Oncology). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995. P. 321–29. 

22. Kok HP, van Haaren PMA, van de Kamer JB, Crezee J. Theoretical Comparison of Intraluminal Heating Techniques. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23(4):395–411. DOI: 10.1080/02656730701344520.

23. Silin AO. Features of the Spatial Distribution of Electromagnetic Fields of Medical Microwave Applicators. Processing Systems Information. 2015;136(11):163–6. (In Russ.).

24. Kurosaki H, Sakurai H, Mitsuhashi N, Tamaki Y, Akimoto T, Takahashi T, Furuta M, Saitoh J-I, Hayakawa K, Niibe H. Biological Cell Survival Mapping for Radiofrequency Intracavitary Hyperthermia Combined with Simultaneous High Dose-Rate Intracavitary Irradiation. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2001;92:95–102. 

25. Kang M, Liu WQ, Qin YT, Wei Z-X, Wang R-S. Long-Term Efficacy of Microwave Hyperthermia Combined with Chemoradiotherapy in Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:7395–400.

26. Overgaard J, Gonzalez Gonzalez D, Hulshof MC, Arcangelis G, Dahl O, Mella O, Bentzen SM. Randomized Trial of Hyperthermia as Adjuvant to Radiotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Malignant Melanoma. Lancet. 1995;345(8949):540–3. 

27. Egawa S, Tsukiyama I, Watanabe S, Ohno Y, Morita K, Tominaga S, Onoyama Y, Hashimoto S, Yanagawa S, Uehara S, Abe M, Mochizuki S, Sugiyama A, Inore T. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Hyperthermia and Radiation Versus Radiation Alone for Superficially Located Cancers. J Jpn. Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 1989;1:135–40.

28. Perez CA, Pajak T, Emami B, Tupchong L, Rubin P. Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Irradiation and Hyperthermia with Irradiation Alone in Superficial Measurable Tumors. Final Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1991;14(2):133–41. 

29. Valdagni R, Amichetti M. Report of Long-Term Follow-Up in a Randomized Trial Comparing Radiation Therapy and Radiation Therapy Plus Hyperthermia to Metastatic Lymphnodes in Stage IV Head and Neck Patients. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;28:163–9.

30. International Collaborative Hyperthermia Group (Vernon CC, Hand JW, Field SB, Machin D, Whaley JB, van der Zee J, van Putten WL, van Rhoon GC, van Dijk JD, González González D, Liu FF, Goodman P, Sherar M. Hyperthermia in the Treatment of Superficial Localized Primary and Recurrent Breast Cancer – Results From Five Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35:731–44. 

31. Vargas HI, Dooley WC, Fenn AJ, Tomaselli MB. Study of Preoperative Focused Microwave Phased Array Thermotherapy in Combination with Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Large Breast Carcinomas. Cancer Therapy. 2007;5:401–8.

32. Trotter JM, Edis AJ, Blackwell JB, Lamb MH, Bayliss EJ, Shepherd JM, Cassidy B. Adjuvant VHF Therapy in Locally Recurrent and Primary Unresectable Rectal Cancer. Australias Radiol. 1996;40(3):298–305. 

33. Shchepotin IB, Evans SRT, Chorny V, Osinsky S, Buras RR, Maligonov P. Intensive Preoperative Radiotherapy with Local Hyperthermia for the Treatment of Gastric Carcinoma. Surg Oncol. 1994;3(1):37–44.

34. Maslennikova AV. Thermoradiation and Chemoradiotherapy of Localized Cancer of the Pharynx and Larynx. – Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Nizhny Novgorod. 2008. 37 pр. (In Russ.).

35. Kouloulias V, Triantopoulou S, Vrouvas J. Gennatas K, Ouzounoglou N, Kouvaris J, Karaiskos P, Aggelakis P, Antypas C, Zygogianni A, Papavasiliou K, Platoni K, Kelekis N.  Combined Chemoradiotherapy with Local Microwave Hyperthermia for Treatment of T3N0 Laryngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(3):167–73.

36. Andreev VG, Mardynsky YuS. Beam and Combined Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer. Moscow. 1998. 115 pp. (In Russ.).

37. Kurpeshev OK, Zubarev AL. The Results of Chemo- and Thermo-Radiation Therapy of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma Who Underwent and Did Not Undergo Surgery. Oncology. 2006;8(3):255–9. (In Russ.).

38. Kurpeshev OK, Ragulin YuA., Mozerov SA, Orlova AV, Lebedeva TV. Possibilities of Local Hyperthermia in the Treatment of Patients with Edematous Form of Breast Cancer. Problems in Oncology. 2016;62(5):680–7. (In Russ.). 

39. Chen HW, Fan JJ, Luo W. A Randomized Trial of Hyperthermo-Radiochemotherapy for Uterine Cervix Cancer. Chinese J. Clin. Oncol. 1997;24:249–51.

40. Wang J, Li D, Chen NA. A Clinical Study on Intraluminal Hyperthermia Combined with External Irradiation for Esophageal Carcinoma. Chinese J Cancer Research. 1996;8(3):200–04.

41. You Q-S, Wang R-Z, Suen G-Q. Yan F-C, Gao Y-J, Cui S-R, Zhao J-H, Zhao T-Z, Ding L. Combination Preoperative Radiation and Endocavitary Hyperthermia for Rectal Cancer: Long-Term results of 44 Patients. Int J Hyperthermia. 1993;9(1):19–24. 

42. Qingshan Y, Shuhua Q, Min L, Rueizhi W. Clinical Results of Thermoradiotherapy of Patients with Carcinoma of Rectum. Jpn J Hyperthermic Oncol. 1996;12(3):251. (Abstracts. The First Congress of the Asian Society of Hypert. Oncol. (ASHO), 1996. AO-21). 

43. Hua Y, Ma S, Fu Z, Hu Q, Wang L, Piao Y. Intracavity Hyperthermia in Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Phase III Clinical Study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(2):180–6. DOI:10.3109/02656736.2010.503982. 

44. Colombo R, Da Pozzo LF, Lev A, Freschi M, Gallus G, Rigatti P. Neoadjuvant Combined Microwave Induced Local Hyperthermia and Topical Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Superficial Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 1996;155(4):1227–32.

45. Colombo R, Salonia A, Leib Z, Pavone-Macaluso M, Engelstein D. Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Thermochemotherapy with Mitomycin-C Alone as Adjuvant Treatment for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC). BJU International. 2011;107(6):912–18.

46. Knysh V, Goldobenko GV, Kim FP, Kozhushkov AI, Barsukov YA, Tkachev SI, Ozhiganov EL. Thermoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. Jornal of N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS. 1991;27(2):33–46. (In Russ.). 

47. Nevolskikh AА. The Effect of Local Hyperthermia on the Long-Term Results of the Combined Treatment of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Obninsk.  2001. 118 p. (In Russ.).

48. Kurpeshev OK, Tsyb AF, Mardynsky YuS, Berdov BA, Kurpesheva AK. Local Hyperthermia in Radiation Therapy of Malignant Tumors (Experimental-Clinical Trial). Obninsk, 2007. 219 pp. (In Russ.).

49. Vlasov OА, Barsukov YA, Tkachev SI, Gordeev SS, Tsaryuk VF, Aliev VA. Reduction of the Stage of the Disease and Indices of Therapeutic Pathomorphosis in Various Variants of the Polyradiomodification Program in the Combined Treatment Regimens for Patients with Rectal Cancer. Oncological Coloproctology, 2018;8(2):63–72. (In Russ.). 

50. Barsukov YA, Knysh VI, Tkachev SI, Nikolaev AV, Oltarzhevskaya ND, Korovina MA, Perevoshchikov AG, Gradyushko AT, Shestopalova IM, Aliev VA, Kuzmichev DV, Mamedli ZZ, Glebovskaya VV. Results of the Combined Treatment of Colorectal Cancer under Conditions of Polyradiomodification. Bulletin of the Moscow Cancer Society. 2009;2:3–7. (In Russ.).

51. Malikhov AG. Modern Treatment Strategy for Patients with Operable Rectal Cancer. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Moscow. 2015. 42 pp. (In Russ.).

52. Ivanov SA, Petrov LO, Erygin DV, Gulidov IA, Karpov AA. Direct Effectiveness of Adding Local Hyperthermia to the Scheme of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2020;7(3):10–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-3-1

53. Li R-Y, Lin SY, Wang P. Long-Time Results of Cervix Cancer in Нyperthermia Combined with Radiotherapy. Jpn J Hyperthermic Oncol. 1996;12(3):257. (Abstracts. The First Congress of the Asian Society of Hypert. Oncol. (ASHO), 1996. AP-46). 

54. Li DJ, Chou CK, Luk KH, Wang JH, Xie CF, McDougall JA, Huang GZ. Design of Intracavitary Microwave Applicators for the Treatment of Uterine Cervix Carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 1991;7(7):693–701.

55. Malikhov GG. Combined and Complex Treatment of Patients with Squamous Cancer of the Anal Canal. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Moscow. 2004. 23 pp. (In Russ.).

56. Kim DF. Combined Organ-Preserving Treatment of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Moscow. 2014. 24 pp. (In Russ.).

57. Kouloulias V,  Plataniotis G, Kouvaris J,  Dardoufas C,  Gennatas C,  Uzunoglu N, Papavasiliou C,  Vlahos L. Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Intracavitary Hyperthermia for Anal Cancer: Feasibility and Long-Term Results From a Phase II Randomized Trial. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;28(1):91–9.

58. Kozlov AA. The Role of Microwave Hyperthermia in the Palliative Treatment of Patients with Prostate Cancer and Recurrence of Bladder Cancer. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. St. Petersburg. 2006. 24 pp. (In Russ.).

59. Karnaukh PA. Multiple Treatment of Patients With Prostate Cancer. Author’s Abstract. Diss. PhD Med. Moscow. 2007. 42 pp. (In Russ.).

60. Rasulov AO, Gordeev SS, Ivanov VA, Barsukov YA, Malikhov AG, Baichorov AB, Tkachev SI, Kozak E.N. A Short Course of Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Combination with Chemotherapy, Local Hyperthermia, and a Prolonged Interval Before Surgery in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Phase II study. Oncological Coloproctology. 2016;6(4):24–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/2220 3478 2016 6 4 24 30. 

61. Van der Zee J, Van der Holt B, Rietveld PJM, Helle PA, Wijnmaalen AJ, Van Putten WLJ. Van Rhoon GC. Reirradiation Combined with Hyperthermia in Recurrent Breast Cancer Results in a Worthwhile Local Palliation. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(3/4), 483–490.

62. Liang S-B, Deng Y-M, Zhang N. Prognostic Significance of Maximum Primary Tumor Diameter in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2013;13:260. DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-13-260. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/260

63. Zlobec I, Minoo P, Karamitopoulou E. Rolecofi Tumor Size in the Preoperative Management of Rectal Cancer Patients. BMC Gastroenterology 2010;10:61–9. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/61

64. Erygin DV, Berdov BA, Nevolskikh AA, Titova LN, Smirnova SG. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer. Oncology J. named P.A. Herzen. 2015;1:13-20. (In Russ.).

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The author declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. The article was prepared by one author.

Article received: 18.09.2021. 

Accepted for publication: 22.10.2021.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 99–101

Conducting Studies of the Am-241 Radionuclide Incorporated
into the Human Body Using a Wound Detector

V.N. Yatsenko, G.M. Avetisov, D.I. Vzorov, S.L. Burtsev, O.V. Yatsenko, E.S. Leonov

A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia.

Contact person: Vladimir Naumovich Yatsenko, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

Purpose: to develop a method for experimental study of the distribution of radionuclide 241Am in human organs and tissues during wound admission to clarify the process of formation of doses of alpha radiation.

Material and methods: in clinical practice of Burnazyan FMBC of the FMBA of Russia  To improve the method of determination, an experiment was performed to determine the depth of radionuclide on pigskin with the location of 241Am point sources behind different thicknesses. 

Results: the used methods of measurement, tested on pigskin, allowed to obtain the dependence of the localization depth of radionuclide 241Am on the measured on the surface of the tissue ratios of photons with different energies.

Conclusion: Set the ratio of photons with different energies on the thickness of the barrier (depth), and proven methodology allow you to go directly to the planning of experimental studies on the barrier effect created in the bone material, and including a radionuclide, the formation of doses of alpha radiation on the bone marrow.

Key words: Wound entry, deepening of the radionuclide in biological tissue, absorbed dose of alpha radiation, distribution of americium in organs and tissues, wound gamma spectrometer

For citation: Yatsenko VN, Avetisov GM, Vzorov DI, Burtsev SL, Yatsenko OV, Leonov ES. Conducting Studies of the Am-241 Radionuclide Incorporated into the Human Body Using a Wound Detector. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(6):99–101.

DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-99-101

References

1. Moskalev Yu.I. Radiobiology of Incorporated Radionuclides. Moscow, Energoatomizdat Publ., 1989. 264 p.

2. Development of a Biokinetic Model for Radionuclide-Contaminated Wounds and Procedures for Their Assessment, Dosimetry and Treatment. NCRP, 2006. REPORT No. 156.

3. Kalistratova V.S., Belyaev I.K., Zhorova E. S., Parfenova I.M., Tishchenko G.S. Radiobiology of incorporated radionuclides. Ed. Kalistratova V.S. Moscow, Burnazyan FMBC FMBA Publ., 2016. 556 p.

4 . Kalistratova V.S., Belyaev I.K., Zhorova E. S., Nisimov P.G., Parfenova I.M., Tishchenko G.S., Tsapkov M.M. Radiobiology of incorporated radionuclides. Ed. Kalistratova V.S. Moscow, Burnazyan FMBC FMBA Publ., 2012. 464 p.

5. Ed. Ilyin L.A. Plutonium. Radiation safety. Moscow, IzdAt Publ., 2005. 416 p. chapter 3.

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 16.09.2021. 

Accepted for publication: 22.10.2021.

 

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

4021539
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
2007
4015
35172
30856
6022
145223
4021539

Forecast today
3480


Your IP:216.73.217.47