JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 51-53
RADIATION THERAPY
A.P. Dmitrenko, N.A. Tolmacheva
Influence of Time Intervals between Radiotherapy and Surgical Treatment on Survival Rate of the Breast Cancer Patients
Oncodispensary, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate influence of time intervals on the overall (OS) and recrudescence free (RFS) survival rate of breast cancer patients (BCP). Two time intervals were considered 1) between neoadjuvant radiation therapy and operation (an interval NRT→operation); 2) between operation and adjuvant radiation therapy (an interval operation→ART).
Material and methods: Sample of patients BC (T1–4N0–3M0), observed in 1990–2004 (n = 2132). All patients executes radical mastectomy. Only NRT it is spent 239 (11.2 %) by the patient, only ART – 1155 (54.2 %) the patient, NRT in a combination with ART it is spent 738 (34.6 %) by the patient. The estimation of influence of time intervals on survival rate of BCP was carried out taking into account three factors: 1) a variant of carrying out radial therapy (only NRT, only ART, NRT in a combination with ART); 2) prevalence of tumor process (T1–2N–, T3–4N–, T1–2N+, T3–4N+); 3) age of patients (49 years and less, 50–59 years, 60 years also are more senior). Influence of time intervals has been investigated separately in groups of patients rightsided and left-sided BC (Statistica 8).
Results: Under a combination NRT and ART authentically negative influence of time intervals on survival rate of patients BC is revealed: 1) an interval operation→ART at patients of an age category of 50–59 years at T1–2N– (OS: p = 0.005; BCP: p = 0.018); 2) an interval in patients with right-sided cancer of an age category of 50–59 years (OS: p = 0.017; DFS: p = 0.08); 3) an interval lNRT→operation in patients with left-sided cancer of an age category of 60 years also is more senior (OS: p = 0.001; BCP: p = 0.013); 4) an interval operation→ART a left-sided cancer of an age category of 50–59 years (OS: p = 0.01; DFS: p = 0.004).
Conclusion: Under certain conditions the increase in time intervals NRT→operation and operation→ART authentically reduces survival rate of patients BC. At combination NRT and ART a laterality of a tumor lesion defines influence of time intervals on survival rate of patients BC of an age category of 50–59 years.
Key words: radial therapy, breast cancer, laterality, time interval
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 35-50
RADIATION MEDICINE
E.M. Melikhova
Changes in Induced Abortion Statistics in 1986 are not Attributable to the Psychological Consequences of Chernobyl
Nuclear Safety Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: To verify the hypothesis on increased rate of induced abortion due to the public fears of Chernobyl radiation in the affected Soviet republics and European countries.
Material and methods: Verified data on induced abortions and live births in the affected republics / counties in 1985–1987 were obtained from demographical databases of UN, INED and the State Statistical Service of USSR. Data for the most contaminated regions of the USSR were taken from the national scientific publications and international Chernobyl reports. Data related to increase of induced abortion rates in a few European countries published in 1987–2001 were crosschecked against statistical errors and changes in corresponding national abortion legislations.
Results: In Belorussian and Ukrainian Republics of the USSR, there were not statistically significant increments of induced abortion rates in 1986 against 1985. In five most contaminated administrative regions of the USSR, legal induced abortion rates in 1986 did not show statistically significant increment as well. No indications, direct or indirect, of noticeable increase of legal or criminal abortion statistics in 1986 were referred by competent national and international experts in the course of extensive studies of medical and psychological consequences of the accident. In fifteen affected European countries, significant increment of induced abortion rates in 1986 was registered in two countries only, namely in Greece and Slovakia, where abortions were legalized that year. The results published in 1987–2001 in favor of the hypothesis were invalid either due to inappropriate statistical analysis or due to ignorance of long-term trends in demographic processes.
Conclusions: 1. Results of the study allow to reject the hypothesis. Even if somewhere anxiety and fear of radiation made some women to perform induced abortions, the number of such cases was far below statistical error. 2. The study suggests that in contaminated territories, despite anxiety and distress most people do not show un-adequate behavior.
Key words: Chernobyl, psychological consequences, induced abortion, birthrate, demographical statistics
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 11-25
RADIATION SAFETY
Yu.I. Gavrilin
Retrospective Estimation of 131I Integrated Deposition Considering Prolonged Character of Area Contamination
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: Development of reliable method for estimation of integrated 131I deposition considering prolonged fall-out character, first of all, for the areas with density of 137Cs deposition less than 3.7×104 Bq m–2. Those estimates will be used in order to reconstruct the thyroid doses.
Material and methods: We used the results of determination of daily deposition of 131I on plane-tables placed in 43 reference points which were received by the staff of Scientific Production Association “Taifun” from various regions of former USSR being based on treatment with corresponding materials. In addition, the results of determination of 131I and 137Cs activity in soil samples collected by the staff of the Institute of Nuclear Energy (Belarus) and other researchers in various areas at different times after the Chernobyl accident have been used. A new reliable method for estimation of integrated 131I deposition using the simplest way is presented.
Results: 1) It has been shown that the value of the ratio of total activity of 131I (GΣΣ(I)) to the integrated deposition of 131I qΣ(I) reaches its maximum value on 56th day after the Chernobyl accident. For the areas with deposition of 131I more than 4500 Bq m–2 a relationship has been received П =12 while for the areas with deposition of 131I less than 4500 Bq m–2 – П = 11.
2) It has been shown that the transfer from accumulated activity of 131I in soil (GΣГ(I)) on day (t) to the integrated activity of 131I, for example, during 56 days counting from the date of the accident can be taken into account by using the relationship GΣГ(I) × Z = GΣΣ(I). The values of coefficient of Z have been determined for 10 reference (index «O») cities for each day from 26.04 to 12.07.1986 with the values of the integrated deposition of 131I qΣ(I) from 4.3×103 to 2.7×106 Bq m–2.
The measured values of activity GΣГ(I)jх in soil for any day (t) in the vicinity of the settlement «j» located in territory «x» НПjх are compared with the values from Table GΣГ(I)о for reference cities НПо for the same day (t), selecting the most close to the corresponding values of GΣГ(I)о together with corresponding value of Z. The values of integrated deposition for НПjх are assessed according to the relationship qΣ(I)jх = GΣГ(I)jх×Z / П. Clarification of the parameters used is presented in section “Introduction”.
The calculated values of parameter qΣ(I)jх together with corresponding values of parameter qΣ(Cs)jх are used to derive the relationship of qΣ(I)jх versus qΣ(Cs)jх for an area of interest, according to which the integrated deposition of 131I are assessed for НПjх where only integrated values of 137Cs are known.
Conclusion: A simple and reliable method for reconstruction of the integrated deposition of 131I for areas of interest has been developed.
Key words: Chernobyl accident, retrospective dosimetry, deposition of 131I and 137Cs, thyroid gland
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 26-34
RADIATION SAFETY
V.F. Demin1,3, V.V. Romanov2, V.Yu. Soloviev3, I.E. Zakharchenko1
Harmonized Approach to the Health Safety Regulation in Different Areas of Human Activity
1. National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia; 3. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a harmonized approach to the management of safety in different areas of human activity.
Material and methods: The basic principles of decision-making on safety: the justification principle, the principle of the protection optimization and the principle of risk limitation have been regarded.
Results: It is proposed two ways (or steps) of harmonization: the first step is to prepare a scientific basis for the harmonization in sanitary regulation between different areas of human activity, overcoming the existing discords. This allows us to move to international harmonization – the harmonization of safety standards and other hygienic standards existing in different countries. We propose an unified approach to establishment of safety standards and other levels of decision-making on safety with the use of risk analysis in different spheres of human activity. Based on this approach, we propose the general safety standards for professionals and the public. Based on these universal safety standards, other levels of decision making on safety rights for a number of contemporary influences of controlled sources of exposure could be proposed.
Conclusions: The developed approach can serve as a basis for proposals elaboration on international harmonization of regulatory and methodical documents on safety innovation in various fields of industrial and other human activities.
Key words: risk assessment, risk index, methodology, health risk standard, harmonization, decision making principle
REFERENCES
- ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Elsevier, 2007, 34 p.
- Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. IAEA, 2011, 308 p.
- Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009), SanPin 2.6.1.2523–09, 72 p. (Russ.)
- On the Establishment of an Health Risk Evaluation Methodology for Population, Order from 05.02.2010. (Russ.)
- On the Establishment of an Interagency Working Group on Harmonization of Health Standards, Order No. 86 from 10.03.2010. (Russ.)
- Breggin L., Falkner R., Jaspers N. et al. Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. Report on the international conference “Nanotech Europe 2009”, 28–30 Sept. 2009, Berlin, Germany, 101 p.
- Demin V.F. Common approach to comparison and standardization of health risk from different sources of harm. // Int. J. Low Radiation, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3/4, pp. 172–178.
- Demin V.F., Ivanov S.I., Novikov S.M. General methodology of health risk assessment in different hazards sources. // Med. Radiol. and Radiat. Safety, 2009, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5–15 (Russ.)
- Demin V.F., Zakharchenko I.E. Health risk from ionizing radiation and other harmful sources: assessment methods and practical application. // Rad. Biol. Radioecol., 2012, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 77–89. (Russ.)
- Nanomaterials – Toxicity, Health and Environmental Issues. Ed. by C.S.S.R. Kumar, 2006, WILEY-VCH, 333 p.
- Pope C. A. 3rd, Burnett R.T., Thun M.J. et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. // JAMA, 2002, vol. 287, i9, pp. 1132 (10).
- Abalkina I.L., Demin V.F., Ivanov S.I. et al. The economic basis for risk assessment for the calculation of the damage caused by the impact on health of various harm factors. // Problems of Risk Analysis, 2005, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 132–138. (Russ.)
- Legasov V.A., Demin V.F., Shevelev Ya.V. Safety as Economic Factor. Risk Value. // Problems of Risk Analysis, 2005, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 185–189. (Russ.)
- Legasov V.A., Demin V.F., Shevelev Ya.V. Discounting and Compromise between the Generations. // Problems of Risk Analysis, 2005, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 141–146. (Russ.)
- European Population Age Standard. URL: http://www.who.int/.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2013. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 5-10
RADIATION BIOLOGY
E.S. Evstratova, N.M. Kabakova, V.G. Petin
Cell Recovery from Potentially Lethal Damage after Repeated Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
Medical Radiological Research Center, Russian, Obninsk, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the ability of diploid yeast cells to recover from potentially lethal radiation damage induced by repeated exposure to cells completely recovered from the previous irradiation.
Material and methods: After irradiation of diploid yeast cells with 60Co γ-rays or 239Pu α-particles and their complete recovery from potentially lethal damage, the cells were irradiated repeatedly. The sequence of irradiation-recovery was repeated thirdly. Basing on the mathematical model of recovery, the probability of recovery per unit time and the portion of irreversibly damaged cells were quantitatively evaluated.
Results: It was shown that the part of irreversibly damaged cells increased after repeated exposure. This effect was more expressed after exposure with high LET ionizing radiation. On the contrary, the constant of recovery, characterizing the probability of recovery per unit time, didn’t depend on the number of repeated irradiation, but it slightly decreased after high LET irradiation.
Conclusion: Concluded that the decrease in the cell ability to recover from potentially lethal radiation damage, expressed in a great extent after exposure with high LET ionizing radiation, is mainly explained by the increase in the part of irreversibly damaged cells, while the recovery process itself decreased only slightly.
Key words: cell recovery, ionizing radiation, potentially lethal damage, mathematical model, irreversible component, the probability of recovery, yeast cells, repeated irradiation