JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Issues journals

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 40-45

RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY

L.N. Belyh, A.P. Biryukov, E.V. Vasiliev, V.P. Nevzorov

About the Theoretical Estimates the Average Risk of Death and Legality of the Application of Various Laws of Probability Distributions in Epidemiological Studies

A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To confirm theoretically the usefulness of empirical formulas for the calculation of the average risk of mortality and the use of various laws of probability distribution for the statistical analysis of observational data.

Results: Estimations of the average value of the risk of death with varying degrees of accuracy by the risk function, the distribution function of the risk, time of occurrence of an undesirable event. Obtain statistical assessment of risk in a particular case (the exponential distribution) by maximum likelihood. Show cased interchangeability laws of probability distribution in epidemiology.

Conclusion: The time of onset of adverse events issued in the form of a continuous finite positive random variable. It enabled to construct a distribution function and to obtain estimates of the average value of the risk with varying degrees of accuracy. Existing work can serve as a theoretical basis for the use of empirical formulas for calculation of average value of the risk function with various laws of probability distribution of statistical data analysis.

Key words: risk function, average value of the risk function, distribution laws, statistical evaluation of the risk

REFERENCES

  1. Boyle P., Parkin D. Statistical methods for registries. In: Cancer Registration (Principles and Methods). IARC Publication. Lyon. 1991. No. 95. P. 126–158.
  2. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly. Annex A. Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer. 2006. 310 p.
  3. Korn G., Korn T. Spravochnik po matematike (dlya nauchnykh rabotnikov i inzhenerov). Moscow: Nauka. 1974. 832 p.
  4. Asachenkov A., Marchuk G., Mohler R., Zuev S. Disease Models. International Institute for Applied System Analysis. Laxenburg. Austria. 1994. 316 p.
  5. Volkov I.K., Zuev S.M., Tsvetkova G.M. Sluchainye protsessy. Moscow: BMSTU. 1999. 448 p.

For citation: Belyh LN, Biryukov AP, Vasiliev EV, Nevzorov VP. About the Theoretical Estimates the Average Risk of Death and Legality of the Application of Various Laws of Probability Distributions in Epidemiological Studies. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(5):40-5. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 31-39

RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY

E.I. Rabinovich, V.F. Obesnyuk, S.V. Povolotskaja, S.N. Sokolova, V.A. Turdakova

Impact Assessment of Carcinogenic Factors on the Atrophic Gastritis in the Cohort of Workers of the Nuclear Facility

Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Research of exogenous and endogenous risk factors of atrophic gastritis (AG) appearing among the workers of atomic enterprise “Mayak”.

Material and methods: 542 individuals were enrolled into research, 438 of them are workers of “Mayak”. The main health hazards for the “Mayak” personnel are possible long-term external γ-exposure and (or) internal exposure with α-particles, as well as the effects of ecotoxic chemicals. The control group consisted of 104 individuals never exposed to any occupational factors. Functional status of the stomach was investigated by GastroPanel test-system (Biohit, Finland). Assessment of statistical significance of the differences was performed on χ2 statistics calculating the p-value as well as applying contingency tables with further calculations of relative risk.

Results and conclusions: According to the results the incidence of atrophic gastritis among Mayak PA workers exceeded those among the individuals never exposed to harmful occupational factors (14.8 % against 4.8 %; p < 0.05). Statistical analysis showed that both occupational and non-occupational factors affect the development of AG. Thus, a significant increase of relative risk of atrophic gastritis was stated in relation to external exposure with doses equal to 150 mGy and higher (RR = 3.62, 90 % CI 1.53-9.12) in relation to influence of inorganic compounds (RR = 1.58 , 90 % CI 1.04-2.33). Family anamnesis of stomach cancer (RR = 2.27, 90 % CI 1.29-3.57), non-ulcerous gastritis (RR = 1.68, 90 % CI 1.08-2.5), female gender (RR = 1.53, 90 % CI 1.05-2.21) had predisposing influence on development of AG. At the same time a statistically significant deterrent effects for development of AG was detected for smoking factor (RR = 0.51, 90 % CI 0.31-0.78). The data obtained are of great importance, and the question on purposeful detection of AG among the workers exposed to occupational radiation and chemical factors arises. Taking into account the effects of non-occupational carcinogenic factors an elaboration of an individual program of cancer prevention appears.

Key words: radiation exposure, carcinogenic factors, gastric cancer, atrophic gastritis, “Gastro Panel”

REFERENCES

  1. Merabishvili V.M. Analiticheskaya epidemiologiya raka zheludka. Voprosy onkologii. 2013. Vol. 59. No. 5. P. 565-570. (In Russ.).
  2. Forman D., Burley V.J. Gastric cancer: global pattern of the disease and an overview of enviromental risk factors. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 633-649.
  3. Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process. FACSAL on CEP. Cancer Res. 1992. Vol. 52. P. 6735-6742.
  4. Sipponen P., Kekki M., Haapakoski J. et al. Gastric cancer risk in chronic atrophic gastritis: statistical calculations of cross-sectional data. Int. J. Cancer. 1985. Vol. 35. P. 173-177.
  5. Koshurnikova N.A., Okatenko P.V., Fomin E.P. et al. Nekotorye pokazateli zabolevaemosti i smertnosti ot zlokachestvennykh novoobrazovanii sredi naseleniya Ozerska za period s 1994 po 2004 gg. Meditsina ekstrem. situatsii. 2006. No. 4 .P. 30-40. (In Russ.)
  6. Kabasheva N.Ya. Kliniko-morfologicheskaya kharakteristika zabolevanii zheludka u bol'nykh khronicheskoi luchevoi bolezn'yu v otdalennom periode i u rabotnikov radiokhimicheskogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Diss. kand. med. nauk.1984.153 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Vaananen Kh., Vaukhkonen M., Khelske T. et al. Neendoskopicheskaya diagnostika atroficheskogo gastrita na osnovanii analiza krovi: korrelyatsiya mezhdu rezul'tatami gistologicheskogo issledovaniya zheludka i urovnyami gastrina-17 i pepsinogena-1 v syvorotke. Klin. persp. gastroenter. gepatol. 2003. No. 4. P. 26-32. (In Russ.)
  8. Miki K., Fujishiro M., Kodashima S., Yahagi N. Longterm results of gastric cancer screening using the serum pepsinogen test method among an asymptomatic middle-aged Japanese population. Dig. Endosc. 2009. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 78-81.
  9. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd New York: Springer. 2002. 487 p.
  10. Obesnyuk V.F., Khromov-Borisov N.N. Interval'nye otsenki pokazatelei sravnitel'nogo mediko-biologicheskogo issledovaniya. V. sb. nauchnykh trudov 10-i mezhvuz. mezhdunar. Telekonferentsii «Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi nauki». Tomsk. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 154-156.
  11. Upton G.J.G. The Analysis of Cross-tabulated Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1978. 160 p.
  12. Epidemiologicheskii slovar'. In: Dzh. M. Lasta (ed.). Moscow: OIZ. 2009. 316 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Pravila proverki soglasiya opytnogo raspredeleniya s teoreticheskim. Chast' 1. Rekomendatsii po standartizatsii: R 50.1.033-2001. Moscow: Gosstandart Rossii. 2002. 174 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Elashov J.D., Lemeshow S. Sample size determination in epidemiologic studies In Handbook of Epidemiology. Ed. By W. Ahrens, I. Pigeot. Springer, 2004.P. 559-594.
  15. Khokhryakov V.V., Khokhryakov V.F., Suslova K.G. et al. Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008 (MWDS-2008): Assessment of internal alpha-dose from measurement results of plutonium activity in urine. Health Phys. 2013. Vol. 104. No. 4. P. 366-378.
  16. Leont'eva N.I., Gracheva N.M., Novikova L.I. Klinicheskaya otsenka diagnostiki khelikobakterioza u bol'nykh s khronicheskoi patologiei zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta diagnosticheskoi test-sistemoi «Gastro Panel. Eksperim. klin. gastroenterol. 2009. No. 2. Supp. 1. P. 80. (In Russ.)
  17. Tsukanov V.V., Tret'yakova O.V., Amel'chugova O.S. et al. Rasprostranennost' atroficheskogo gastrita tela zheludka u naseleniya g. Krasnoyarska starshe 45 let. RZhGGK,.2012. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 27-31. (In Russ.)
  18. Kuwahara Y., KonoS., Eguchi H. et al. Relationship between serologically diagnosed chronic atrophic gastritis, H. pylori and environmental factors in Japanese men. Scand. Gastroenterology. 2000. Vol. 35. No. 5. P. 476-481.
  19. Dorn O.Yu., Peskov S.A., Poteryaeva E.L. et al. Faktory riska v razvitii gastropatii u rabochikh pyleopasnykh professii. Meditsina truda i prom. ekologiya. 2011. No. 2. P. 23-27. (In Russ.)
  20. Rapoport S.I. Gastrity. Posobie dlya vrachei. Moscow: Medpraktika. 2010. 19 p. (In Russ.)
  21. Hishida A., Matsuo K., Goto Y., Hamajima N. Genetic predisposition to Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric precancerous conditions. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 10. P. 369-379.
  22. Sun L.P., Guo X.L., Zhang Y. et al. Impact of pepsinogen Ϡpolimorfism on individual susceptibility to gastric cancer and its precancerous conditions in a Northeast Chinese population. J. Cancer Res. Oncol. 2009. Vol. 135. P. 1033-1039.
  23. Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2006 Report. 1A. New York: United Nations Publication. 2008. 383 p.
  24. Bonney G.E., Elston R.C., Correa P. et al. Genetic etiology of gastric carcinoma: 1. Chronic atrophic gastritis. Genet. Epidemiol. 1986. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 213-214.
  25. Muszyński J., Biernacka D., Siemińska J. et al. Effect of age and sex on the occurrence of gastritis changes in gastric mucosa. Pol. Med. Wewn. 1996. Vol. 95. No. 6. P. 542-548.
  26. Tokui N., Nishisaka S., Mizoue T. et al. A sero-epidemiological study on atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection. JUOEN. 1996. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 133-140.
  27. Risk factors for atrophic chronic gastritis in a European population: results of the Eurohepygast study. The Eurohepygast Study Group. Gut. 2002. Vol. 50.P. 779-785.
  28. Hishida A., Matsuo K., Goto Y. et. al. Smoking behavior and risk ̥licobacter pylori infection, gastric atrophy and gastric cancer in Japanese. Asian. J. Cancer Prev. 2010. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 313-317.
  29. Parente F., Lazzaroni M., Sangaletti O. et al. Cigarette smoking, gastric acid secretion and serum pepsinogen-1 concentration in duodenal ulcer patients. Gut. 1985. Vol. 26. No. 12. P. 1327-1332.
  30. Pomytkina T.E. Soderzhanie gastrina-17 i pepsinogena-1 v syvorotke krovi bol'nykh yazvennoi bolezn'yu dvenadtsatiperstnoi kishki pri proizvodstvennom kontakte s azotistymi soedineniyami. Klinich. laborator. diagnostika. 2009. No. 311.P. 16-19. (In Russ.)
  31. SanPin 2.6.1.2523-09. Normy radiatsionnoi bezopasnosti NRB-99/2009. Utverzhdeny postanovleniem glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha RF ot 7.07.2009. (In Russ.)

For citation: Rabinovich EI, Obesnyuk VF, Povolotskaja SV, Sokolova SN, Turdakova V.A. Impact Assessment of Carcinogenic Factors on the Atrophic Gastritis in the Cohort of Workers of the Nuclear Facility. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(5):31-9. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 12-24

RADIATION SAFETY

A.V. Akleyev1,2, V.K. Ivanov3, T.G. Sazykina4, S.M. Shinkarev5

Consequences of the Nuclear Accident at the “Fukushima-1” NPP (Overview Issued by the UNSCEAR in 2013)

1. Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine FMBA, Chelyabinsk, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia; 3. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre, Obninsk, Russia; 4. Research and Production Association “Typhoon”, Obninsk, Russia; 5. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia

ABSTRACT

The UNSCEAR has recently summarized the overview data on the levels of radiation impacts resulting from the accident at the “Fukushima-1” NPP in 2011 and 2012, as well as on the risk of the development of radiation effects on human health and the impacts on the biota. In the annex to the overview, the dose estimates and the health effects for different population groups in Japan and, to a lesser degree, in the neighboring countries are presented. The Committee has analyzed a multitude of data sets provided by the official state organizations of Japan and other countries, and also the international organizations (IAEA, WHO, and other), on the levels of radiation exposure and deposition of the radioactive matter in each of the Japanese prefectures, concentrations of radionuclides in food products, exposures of the population and workers. In the process of the preparation of the overview, the Committee used the data and the literature published before October 2012. The overview also contains a chronological description of events at the Fukushima-1 NPP, including the events unfolding at the power plant; classification of the releases of radioactive materials into the atmosphere and the ocean; the measures taken for protection of the workers and the population from radiation exposures; estimation of exposure doses received by the population over the first year after the accident, prognosis for dose formation during the next ten years and throughout life; estimation of doses for workers engaged in the elimination of the consequences of the accident and in the clean-up operations during the period from March 11, 2011, and from October 31, 2012; a description of the health outcomes; assessment of exposure doses and effects on the biota inhabiting the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (fresh water and sea water).

Key words: nuclear power plant, Fukushima-1, releases, doses, biological effects, biota

REFERENCES

  1. Hosokawa Y., Hosoda M., Nakata A. et al. Thyroid screening survey on children after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Radiat. Emergency Medicine. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 82-86.
  2. Povinec P.P., Hiros K., Aoyama M. Radiostronium in the western North Pacific: Characteristics, behavior, and the Fukushima impact. Environ. Technol. 2012. Vol. 46. P. 10356-10363.
  3. Romanenko A.E., Likhtarev I.A., Shandala N.K. et al. Dozy oblucheniya shchitovidnoi zhelezy i organizatsiya endokrinologicheskogo monitoringa zhitelei USSR posle avarii na ChNPP. Med. radiol. 1991. No. 2. P. 41-49. (In Russ.).
  4. Stepanenko V.F., Tsyb A.F., Gavrilin Yu.I. et al. Dozy oblucheniya shchitovidnoi zhelezy naseleniya Rossii v rezul'tate avarii na ChNPP (retrospektivnyi analiz). Radiatsiya i risk. 1996. No. 7. P. 225-245. (In Russ.).
  5. Gavrilin Y.I., Khrouch V.T., Shinkarev S.M. et al. Chernobyl Accident: Reconstruction of Thyroid Dose for Inhabitants of the Republic of Belarus. Health Phys. 1999. Vol. 76. P. 105-119.
  6. Zvonova I.A., Balonov M.I. Radioiodine dosimetry and prediction of consequences of thyroid exposure of the Russian population following the Chernobyl accident. In: The Chernobyl papers, 1. Doses to the Soviet population and early health effects studies. 1993. P. 71-125.
  7. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume II: Effects. Scientific Annexes C, D and E. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with scientificannexes. United Nations sales publication E.11.IX.3. United Nations. New York. 2011. 49 p.
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. ICRP. 1994. Vol. 24.
  9. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Age-dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides - Part 4. Inhalation Dose Coefficients. ICRP Publication 71. ICRP. 1995. Vol. 25.
  10. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP. 2012. Vol. 41 (suppl.).
  11. Shinkarev S.M., Kotenko K.V., Granovskaya E.O. et al. Estimation of the contribution of short-lived radioiodines to the thyroid dose for the public in case of inhalation intake following the Fukushima accident. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2014. P. 1-6, DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu335.
  12. Gavrilin Yu., Khrouch V., Shinkarev S. et al. Individual thyroid dose estimation for a case-control study of Chernobyl-related thyroid cancer among children of Belarus - Part I: 131I, short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, 135I), and short-lived radiotelluriums (131mTe and 132Te). Health Phys. 2004. Vol. 86. P. 565-585.
  13. Shinkarev S., Voillequé P., Gavrilin Yu. et al. Credibility of Chernobyl thyroid doses exceeding 10 Gy based on in vivo measurements of 131I in Belarus. Health Phys. 2008. Vol. 94. P. 180-187.
  14. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Uncertainties in risk estimates for cancer due to exposure to ionizing radiation (A/AC.82/R.687). Document for the UNSCEAR 59th Session, Vienna, 21-25 May 2012. Distr. Restricted. UNSCEAR. 2012.
  15. World Health Organization. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. Geneva: WHO. 2013. 120 p.
  16. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume I: Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annexes A and B. UNSCEAR 2006 Report. United Nations sales publication E.08.IX.6. United Nations. New York. 2008.
  17. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Volume II: Scientific Annex B. UNSCEAR 2013 Report. United Nations sales publication E.14.IX.2. United Nations. New York. 2013.
  18. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions / Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs - Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context. ICRP Publication 118. Ann. ICRP. 2012. Vol. 41.
  19. Shigemura J., Tanigawa T., Saito I. et al. Psychological distress in workers at the Fukushima nuclear power plants. JAMA. 2012. Vol. 308. No. 7. P. 667-669.
  20. Brown J.E., Alfonso B., Avila R. et al. The ERICA Tool. Environ. Radioactivity. 2008. Vol. 99. No. 9. P. 1371-1383.
  21. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annex: Effects of Radiation on the Environment. United Nations sales publication E.96.IX.3. New York. 1996. 86 p.
  22. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Annex E: Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Non-human Biota. United Nations. New York. 2008. 97 p.
  23. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants for the Purposes of Environmental Protection. J. Valentin (Ed.), ICRP Publication 108. Ann. ICRP, 2008. Vol. 38. No. 4-6. 76 p.
  24. Sazykina T.G. ECOMOD - An ecological approach to radioecological modelling. J. Environ.Radioact. 2000. Vol. 50. No. 3. P. 207-220.
  25. United Nations Scientific Committee n the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume II: Effects, Scientific Annexes C, D and E. United Nations sales publication E.11.IX.3. United Nations. New York. 2011.

For citation: Akleyev AV, Ivanov VK, Sazykina TG, Shinkarev S.M. Consequences of the Nuclear Accident at the “Fukushima-1” NPP (Overview Issued by the UNSCEAR in 2013). Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(5):12-24. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 25-30

RADIATION SAFETY

R.M. Alexakhin

Radioecological Aspects of the Nuclear Accident at the “Fukushima-1” NPP

Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ABSTRACT

The estimation of the effects on biota of ionizing radiation caused by environmental radionuclides is one of the key radioecological problems in the area of the “Fukushima-1” NPP accident on 11 March 2011. In the “Fukushima-1” NPP accident area two groups of assessments of potential effects of radioactive contamination on different species of terrestrial biota in the first two years following radioactive fallout have been performed: 1) direct experimental study of possible radiation effects in natural conditions, 2) determination of ionizing radiation effects based on the use of models of radionuclide transport in the environment and their accumulation in plants and animals, as well as, the application of the absorbed dose rates estimations with their subsequent comparison to the threshold values for these parameters. The conclusion has been reached that no ecological shifts at the level of terrestrial ecosystem alterations and disturbances of interrelationships between populations have been statistically significantly and unambiguously revealed even at the highest densities of contamination. Some species of terrestrial biota showed only insignificant variations (mainly of a cytogenetic nature) eliminable at later stages of the post accidental period.

Key words: radiation accidents, nuclear power plant, Fukushima-1, terrestrial environment, radioactive contamination, biota, irradiation, modeling

REFERENCES

  1. Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR Report 2013. Volume 1. Report to the General Assembly. Scientific Annex A: Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure due to the Nuclear Accident after 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. United Nations. New York. 2014.
  2. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Radiatsionnye avarii: posledstviya i zashchitnye mery. In: L.A. Il'ina, V.A. Gubanova (eds.). Moscow: IzdAT. 2001. 752 p.
  3. Möller A.P., Hagiwara A., Matsui S. et al. Abundance of birds in Fukushima judged from Chernobyl. Environ. Pollution. 2012. Vol. 164. P. 36-39.
  4. Möller A.P., Nishimi I., Suzuki H. et al. Differences in effects of radiation on abundance of animals in Fukushima and Chernobyl. Ecol. Indicators. 2013. Vol. 24. P. 75-81.
  5. Hiyma A., Nohara C., Kinjo S. et al. The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the pale grass blue butterfly. Sci. Rep. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 570.
  6. Andersson P., Garnier-Laplace J., Beresford N.A. et al. Protection of the environment from ionizing radiation in a regulatory context (PROTECT): proposed numerical benchmark values. J. Environ. Radioact. 2009. Vol. 100. No. 2. P. 1100-1108.
  7. Environmental protection. The concept and use of reference animals and plants. ICRP Publication 108. Annals ICRP. 2008. Vol. 38.
  8. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 1996 Report. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 1996 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific annex, United Nations. New York. 1996.
  9. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume II: Effects. Scientific Annexes C, D and E. UNSCEAR 2008 Report. United Nations. New York. 2011.
  10. Beresford N.A., Barnett C.I., Jones D.G. et al. Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008. Vol. 99. No. 9. P. 1430-1439.
  11. Geras’kin S.A., Fesenko S.V., Alexakhin R.M. Effects of non-human species irradiation after the Chernobyl NPP accident. Environ. Int. 2008. Vol. 34. No. 6. P. 880-897.
  12. Garnier-Laplace J., Copplestone D., Gilbin R. et al. Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008. Vol. 99. P. 1474-1483.
  13. Garnier-Laplace J., Beaugelin-Seiller K., Hinton T.G. Fukushima wildlife dose reconstruction signals ecological consequences. Environ. Sci. Techiro. 2011. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 5077-5078.

For citation: Alexakhin RM. Radioecological Aspects of the Nuclear Accident at the “Fukushima-1” NPP. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(5):25-30. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 5-11

RADIATION BIOLOGY

A.A. Ivanov1,2, I.E. Andrianova1, T.M. Bulynina1,2, O.V. Dorozhkina1,2, V.N. Mal’tsev1, N.M. Stavrakova1, G.A. Shal’nova1, A.Yu. Bushmanov1

The Pharmacological Effects of Melanin in the Irradiated Mice

1. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; 2. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Investigation of the melanin efficiency administered to mice after irradiation at different doses.

Material and methods: The bone marrow form of the acute radiation syndrome in mice CD-1 was reconstructed by single or fractionated whole body irradiation with gamma- or X-rays. Phytomelanin water-soluble was given with water ad libitum from the first to the 30-th day after irradiation.

Results: It was shown that melanin was given after the acute exposure to ionizing radiation in doses 6.0-7.5 Gy decreased the lethal outcomes in all groups of mice. The survival melanin treated mice increased by 13-18 % as compared with control. After fractionated exposure (1 Gy daily, total dose 10 Gy) melanin produced 100 % therapeutic effect when the survival of control mice was 43.7 %. Melanin treated mice has demonstrated that body weight loss and the frequency test for bacteriuria were lower than in control. Moreover in mice which received melanin a more pronounced restoration motoric and searching activity had been observed.

Conclusion: According our experimental data melanin given “per os” after irradiation produced a marked therapeutic effect.

Key words: phytomelanin, X-rays and gamma-irradiation, single and fractionated, survival, bacteriuria, behavioral reactions, experimental therapy

REFERENCES

  1. Zherebin Yu.M., Bondarenko N.A., Makan S.Yu. et al. Farmakologicheskie svoistva melaninovykh pigmentov. Doklady AN USSR. 1984. No. 3. Seriya B. P. 64-67. (In Russ.).
  2. Ostrovskii M.A., Dontsov A.E. Fiziologicheskie funktsii melanina v organizme. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 1985. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 670-678. (In Russ.)
  3. Kunwar A., Adhihary B., Jayakumar S. et al. Melanin a promising radioprotector: mechanisms of actions in mice model. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012. Vol. 264. No. 2. P. 202-211.
  4. Berdyshev G.D. O zashchitnom deistvii melanina pri obluchenii myshei. Radiobiologiya. 1964. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 644-645. (In Russ.).
  5. Schweitzer A.D., Revskaya E., Chu P. et al. Melanincovered nanoparticles for protection of bone marrow during radiation therapy of cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Phys. 2010. Vol. 78. No. 5. P. 1494-1502.
  6. Ogarkov B.N., Samusenok L.V. Sposob polucheniya pigmenta-krasitelya iz rastitel'nogo syr'ya. Patent RU 2215761 S09861. 2003. (In Russ.).
  7. Ivanov A.A., Andrianova I.E., Mal'tsev V.N. et al. Farmakologicheskie svoistva fitomelanina. Meditsina ekstrem. situatsii. 2014. No. 4. P. 66-72. (In Russ.).
  8. Ivanov A.A., Shal'nova G.A., Mal'tsev V.N. et al. Bakteriuriya pri eksperimental'noi ostroi luchevoi bolezni. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2014. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 12-15. (In Russ.).
  9. Buresh Ya., Bureshova O., Kh'yusten Dzh.P. Metodiki i osnovnye eksperimenty po izucheniyu mozga i povedeniya. Moscow: Vyssh. shk. 1991. 399 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Bushmanov A.Yu., Ivanov A.A., Andrianova I.E. et al. Protivoluchevye svoistva melanina. Saratovskii nauchno-med. zhurnal. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 828-832. (In Russ.).
  11. Vasin M.V. Sredstva, povyshayushchie radiorezistentnost' organizma (sredstva «biologicheskoi zashchity»). V kn. «Radiatsionnaya meditsina». L.A. Il'ina (ed.). Moscow: IzdAT. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 756-761. (In Russ.).
  12. Ivanov A.A., Mal'tsev V.N. Immunnaya sistema. V kn.: «Radiatsionnaya meditsina». L.A. Il'ina (ed.). Moscow: IzdAT. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 327-348. (In Russ.).
  13. Petrov R.V. Immunologiya ostrogo luchevogo porazheniya. Moscow: Atomizdat. 1962. 267 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Borshchevskaya M.I., Vasil'eva S.M. Razvitie predstavlenii o biokhimii i farmakologii melaninovykh pigmentov. Voprosy med. khimii. 1999. Vol. 45, No. 1. P. 13-24. (In Russ.).
  15. Izmest'eva O.S., Dubovik B.V., Zhavoronkov L.P. Eksperimental'naya otsenka radiozashchitnogo deistviya melanina na somaticheskoe razvitie pri obluchenii v antenatal'nom periode ontogeneza. Radiats. biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2007. Vol. 47. No. 6. P. 684-689. (In Russ.).
  16. Ostrovskii M.A., Dontsov A.E. Fiziologicheskie funktsii melanina v organizme. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 1985. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 670-678. (In Russ.).
  17. Zhukova N.A., Palyga G.F., Maksimenko A.A. Vliyanie poliinozinovoi politsitidilovoi kisloty (poly(i:c)) i dextran sulfate (DS) na radiorezistentnost' zhivotnykh. Radiatsiya i organizm. Obninsk. 1979. No. 3. P. 16-19. (In Russ.).
  18. Li Yuhuan. Radioprotective activity of Poly I: C. Clin. J. Radiol. Med. Protect. 1982. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 31-33.
  19. Patсhen M.L., MacVittie T.J., Jackson W.E. Postirradiation glucan administration enhances the radioprotective effects of WR-2721. Radiat. Res. 1989. Vol. 117. P. 59-69.
  20. Andrianova I.E., Andrushchenko V.N., Vernigorova L.A., et al. Eksperimental'naya razrabotka i vnedrenie v praktiku kompleksa protivoluchevykh sredstv i sposoba lecheniya massovykh radiatsionnykh porazhenii. Meditsina ekstrem. situatsii. 1999. No. 2. P. 52-58. (In Russ.).
  21. Il'in L.A., Andrianova I.E., Glushkov V.A. Izuchenie zavisimosti radiozashchitnoi aktivnosti khitozana ot ego molekulyarnoi massy. Radiats. biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2004. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 176-178. (In Russ.).
  22. El-Obeid A., Al-Harbi S., AL-Jomah N., Hassib A. Herbal melanin modulates tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production. Phytomedicine. 2006. Vol. 13. No. 5. P. 324-333.
  23. Hamphreys E.R., Howells G.R. The effect of oral sodium alginate on the retention of radioactive barium in the rat. Contamin. Radionucleid. Osteotrop. et Radioprot. Soc. Franc. Radioprot. 5’eme Congr. Int. Grenoble. Montrouge. 1971. P. 593-598.
  24. Zhogolev K.D., Tsygan V.N., Nikitin V.Yu., Egorov V.N. Primenenie preparatov khitozana v kachestve biologicheski aktivnykh dobavok k pishche. Med. aspekty radiats. i khim. bezopasnosti. Materialy konferentsii. Saint Petersburg: VMA. 2001. P. 432-433. (In Russ.).
  25. Tarasenko G.A. Radioprotektornye i antitoksicheskie svoistva khitozana iz pantsirya kamchatskogo kraba po otnosheniyu 40K, 137S i 203Ng. Novye perspektivy v ispol'zovanii khitina i khitozana. Materialy 5-i konferentsii. Moscow: VNIROl. 1999. P. 197-198. (In Russ.).
  26. Senyuk O.F., Gorovoi L.F., Kovalev V.A. et al. Osobennosti i vozmozhnost' khimicheskoi modifikatsii povedencheskikh reaktsii v pripodnyatom krestoobraznom labirinte khronicheski obluchennykh myshei s razlichnoi geneticheski determinirovannoi radiochuvstvitel'nost'yu. Radiats. biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2013. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 170-182. (In Russ.).

For citation: Ivanov AA, Andrianova IE, Bulynina TM, Dorozhkina OV, Mal’tsev VN, Stavrakova NM, Shal’nova GA, Bushmanov AYu. The Pharmacological Effects of Melanin in the Irradiated Mice. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2015;60(5):5-11. Russian.

PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

2763479
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
3844
2366
21863
18409
71222
75709
2763479

Forecast today
4896


Your IP:216.73.216.239