JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 4
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-33-38
M.V. Merkulov, T.A. Astrelina, D.Yu. Usupzhanova, V.A. Brunchukov, I.V. Kobzeva, Yu.B. Suchkova, N.P. Iashin, O.G. Mikhadarkina, V.A. Nikitina, T.F. Malivanova, E.A. Dubova, S.V. Lishchuk, K.A. Pavlov, O.F. Serova
Evaluation of the Use of a Modified Hydrogel in the Treatment
of Local Radiation-Induced Skin Injures of Laboratory Animals
A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: T.A. Astrelina, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Introduction: Improving existing and developing new methods for treating local radiation injuries (LRI) of the skin is very important. One of the promising areas in this area is the development of preparations – hydrogels (H) with high regenerative potential, obtained from lyophilisates of decellularized biological tissues (LDT). Due to the multicomponent composition and the presence of such connective tissue components as collagen, laminin, fibronectin, elastin, as well as growth factors, such hydrogels stimulate cellular migration and adhesion, and also maintain their viability and functional activity in the wound bed. To improve the ease of use (improving the mechanical properties of the drug), as well as slowing down the biodegradation process, H-LDT preparations are modified, in particular, by the method of chemical cross-linking with genipin (GNP).
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of using a modified hydrogel preparation in the treatment of local radiation skin lesions in laboratory animals.
Material and methods: Local radiation injuries were modeled in 15 laboratory animals (male Wistar rats, average weight 225.0±25.0 g) using an LNK-268-PS X-ray machine. MLP treatment was performed with a hydrogel from lyophilisate of decellularized human tissues (H-LDT), obtained by a modified method of dry-cleaning cross-linking with genipin (GNP: 0.2 mM) on days 28–32, 35, 42 after irradiation. The animals were divided into 3 groups (5 animals in each) depending on the type of therapy: control group without therapy; H-LDT group; H-LDT+GNP group. Observation of laboratory animals was carried out up to 119 days with planimetric and histological examination (hematoxylin and eosin staining) of the course of the wound process of MLP.
Results: Planimetric studies have shown that the area (S) of the open wound surface (OWS) decreased by 30 % of the total S lesion in the experimental groups of animals (Н-LDH and H-LDH+GNP) on day 56 compared to the control group – on day 70. On day 119 of observation, healing of the LRI and the absence of OWS were noted in 40 % of animals in the H-LDT group. In the H-LDH+ GNP group, from day 28 to day 119 of observation, a decrease in S OWS by 6.15 times was noted compared to the control group of animals – by 3.49 times. In the H-LDT group, the results of histological studies demonstrated weak inflammatory infiltration, healing of the LRI and the absence of inflammatory infiltration and necrosis zone, the presence of single hair follicles.
Conclusion: Thus, the present study showed that hydrogel preparations from lyophilisate of decellularized human tissues and hydrogel modified with genipin have a positive effect on the dynamics of the course of the wound process of LRI in laboratory animals, no irritating effect on the skin was detected.
Keywords: modified hydrogel, localized radiogenic lesions, therapeutic potential, biomaterials
For citation: Merkulov MV, Astrelina TA, Usupzhanova DYu, Brunchukov VA, Kobzeva IV, Suchkova YuB, Iashin NP, Mikhadarkina OG, Nikitina VA, Malivanova TF, Dubova EA, Lishchuk SV, Pavlov KA, Serova OF. Evaluation of the Use of a Modified Hydrogel in the Treatment of Local Radiation-Induced Skin Injures of Laboratory Animals. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(4):33–38.
(In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-33-38
References
- Borrelli MR, Shen AH, Lee GK, Momeni A, Longaker MT, Wan DC. Radiation-Induced Skin Fibrosis: Pathogenesis, Current Treatment Options, and Emerging Therapeutics. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(4S Suppl 1):S59-S64. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000 СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ 002098
- Ильин, Л. А. Радиационная гигиена / Л.А. Ильин, И.П. Коренков, Б.Я. Наркевич - Москва : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2017. – 416 с.
- Alex K. Bryant, Matthew P. Banegas, Maria Elena Martinez, Loren K. Mell, James D. Murphy; Trends in Radiation Therapy among Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2000–2030. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1 June 2017; 26 (6): 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1023
- Wang Y, Chen S, Bao S, et al. Deciphering the fibrotic process: mechanism of chronic radiation skin injury fibrosis. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1338922. Published 2024 Feb 15. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1338922
- Cox J. D., Ang K. K. Radiation oncology E-book: rationale, technique, results. – Elsevier Health Sciences, 2009.
- Hickok J. T. et al. Occurrence, severity, and longitudinal course of twelve common symptoms in 1129 consecutive patients during radiotherapy for cancer //Journal of pain and symptom management. – 2005. – Т. 30. – №. 5. – С. 433-442.
- Huang C, Dong L, Zhao B, et al. Anti-inflammatory hydrogel dressings and skin wound healing. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12(11):e1094. doi:10.1002/ctm2.1094
- Qiao S, Peijie T, Nan J. Crosslinking strategies of decellularized extracellular matrix in tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024;112(5):640-671. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37650
- Davidov T, Efraim Y, Hayam R, Oieni J, Baruch L, Machluf M. Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels Originated from Different Organs Mediate Tissue-Specific Properties and Function. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11624. Published 2021 Oct 27. doi:10.3390/ijms222111624
- Das A, Abas M, Biswas N, et al. A Modified Collagen Dressing Induces Transition of Inflammatory to Reparative Phenotype of Wound Macrophages. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14293. Published 2019 Oct 4. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49435-z
- Brown M, Li J, Moraes C, Tabrizian M, Li-Jessen NYK. Decellularized extracellular matrix: New promising and challenging biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2022;289:121786. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121786
- Zhang M., Zhao X. Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management //International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. – 2020. – Т. 162. – С. 1414-1428.
- Almadani Y. H. et al. Wound healing: a comprehensive review //Seminars in plastic surgery. – Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 2021. – Т. 35. – №. 03. – С. 141-144.
- Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2017, 53(1), 21–35 [Химия гетероцикл. соединений 2017, 53(1), 21–35]
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.03.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.04.2025.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 4
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-39-45
L.I. Baranov, A.Yu. Bushmanov, Е.V. Vasilev, A.N. Tsarev, S.M. Dumansky,
I.G. Dibirgadzhiyev, T.M. Bulanova, E.V. Popova, Yu.E. Smirnov, M.V. Kalinina
The Digital Twin and the Digital Profile as the Basis for the Collection and Analysis of Medical Data
A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: L.I. Baranov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Digital footprint, digital shadow, digital presence
Digital profile
Digital twin
Similarities and differences
Digital Medical Profile
A digital twin in the healthcare system
Conclusion
Keywords: digital twin, digital profile, digital medical profile, digital shadow, digital footprint, medical data, healthcare system
For citation: Baranov LI, Bushmanov AYu, Vasilev ЕV, Tsarev AN, Dumansky SM, Dibirgadzhiyev IG, Bulanova TM, Popova EV, Smirnov YuE, Kalinina MV. The Digital Twin and the Digital Profile as the Basis for the Collection and Analysis of Medical Data. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(4):39–45. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-39-45
References
1. Digital Footprint. Scientific and Educational Portal “Big Russian Encyclopedia”. URL: https://bigenc.ru/c/tsifrovoi-sled-0e7ff5 (accessed: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
2. Digital Footprint. Kaspersky Lab Website. URL: https://www.kaspersky.ru/resource-center/definitions/what-is-a-digital-footprint (date of request: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
3. On Approval of the Rules for Granting Subsidies from the Federal Budget to an Organization Endowed by the Government of the Russian Federation with the Functions of an Operator for State Support of the Activities of the University of the National Technological Initiative: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 04/22/2019 No.483 (as amended on 09/29/2023). SPS ConsultantPlus (date of application: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
4. On Approval of the Professional Standard “Specialist in Modeling, Collecting and Analyzing Digital Footprint Data”: Order of the Ministry of Labor of the Russian Federation dated 07/09/2021 Nо.462n. SPS ConsultantPlus (date of application: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
5. Methodological Recommendations on the Organizational Protection of an Individual’s Personal Data. Roskomnadzor Website. URL: https://rkn.gov.ru/docs/MR_itog.docx (date of request: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
6. Information Technologies. Energy is Sфmart. The Internet of Energy. Terms and Definitions: PNST 912-2024. IS «Techexpert: 6th Generation» (accessed: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
7. The Question: “What is the Infrastructure of a Citizen’s Digital Profile?” SPS ConsultantPlus (accessed: 03/21/2025) (In Russ.).
8. On Approval of the Strategic Direction in the Field of Digital Transformation of Public Administration: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 03/16/2024 No.637-r. SPS ConsultantPlus (accessed: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
9. Prokhorov A., Lysachev M. The Digital Doppelganger. Analysis, Trends, and Global Experience. Corporate Edition of ROSATOM. Ed. A.Borovkov. Moscow, Alliansprint LLC Publ., 2020. 401 p. (In Russ.).
10. As the Heart Shows: The Standard of Digital Medical Twins Will Appear in Russia. Izvestia Newspaper Website. URL: https://iz.ru/1779241/valeria-misina-ana-sturma-maria-neduk/kak-serdce-pokazet-standart-cifrovyh-medicinskih-dvoinikov-poavitsa-v-rossii (date of reference: 03/21/2025) (In Russ.).
11. Konstantin Major: I Can Be Friends. TASS Website. URL: https://tass.ru/business-officials/21878885 (date of request: 03/31/2024) (In Russ.).
12. Mikhail Murashko: It is Necessary to Create a Digital Health Profile for Each Person. Website of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation URL: https://minzdrav.gov.ru/news/2021/06/04/16781-mihail-murashko-neobhodimo-sozdat-tsifrovoy-profil-zdorovya-dlya-kazhdogo-cheloveka (date of request: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
13. The Ministry of Health Explained Why the Patient Needs a Digital Profile. Website of the Rossiyskaya Gazeta. URL: https://rg.ru/2021/12/03/v-minzdrave-poiasnili-zachem-pacientu-cifrovoj-profil.html (date of request: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
14. The Results of the FOMS Digital Transformation in 2023. Development Plans in 2024. EGISZ Participants’ Operational Interaction Portal. URL: https://portal.egisz.rosminzdrav.ru/files/2024.01.24_коллегия_Баланин_И_В.pdf (date of address: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
15. Message from the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly dated 02/29/2024. SPS ConsultantPlus (date of address: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
16. List of Instructions for the Implementation of the President’s Message to the Federal Assembly (approved by the President of the Russian Federation on 30.03.2024 No.Pr-616). SPS ConsultantPlus (date of application: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
17. Mikhail Murashko Named Priority Trends in the Development of the Healthcare System. Website of the Russian Newspaper. URL: https://rg.ru/2024/03/03/mihail-murashko-nazval-prioritetnye-trendy-v-razvitii-sistemy-zdravoohraneniia.html (date of request: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
18. First Deputy Minister of Health of Russia Vladimir Zelensky Spoke about the Creation of the Domain “Healthcare”. Website of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. URL: https://minzdrav.gov.ru/en/news/2022/06/02/18814-pervyy-zamestitel-ministra-zdravoohraneniya-rossii-vladimir-zelenskiy-rasskazal-o-sozdanii-domena-zdravoohranenie (date of access: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
19. “Digital Twins” of Doctors and Patients will Appear in Russia. Website of the Parliamentary Newspaper. URL: https://www.pnp.ru/social/v-rossii-poyavyatsya-cifrovye-dvoyniki-vrachey-i-pacientov.html (date of request: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
20. Digital Transformation of Healthcare. Domain “Healthcare”. Portal of Operational Interaction of EGISZ participants. URL: https://portal.egisz.rosminzdrav.ru/files/2024.01.24_коллегия_Зеленский_В_А.pdf (date of application: 03/24/2025) (In Russ.).
21. On Approval of the Strategic Direction in the Field of Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 04/17/2024 No.959-r. SPS ConsultantPlus (date of application: 03/20/2025) (In Russ.).
22. On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 05/29/2017 No.203. SPS ConsultantPlus (accessed: 03/25/2025) (In Russ.).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.03.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.04.2025.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 4
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-55-65
S.Yu. Chekin, A.I. Gorski, M.A. Maksioutov, S.V. Karpenko, K.A. Tumanov,
N.V. Shchukina, E.V. Kochergina
Assessment of Radiation Risks of Digestive System Diseases among Chernobyl Liquidators, Considering the Influence of Other Diseases Identified in Them During the Follow-up Period
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre –
branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Obninsk, Russia
Contact person: S.Yu. Chekin, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To assess the radiation risks of digestive system diseases (DSD) in the low and medium dose range (up to 1.5 Gy), considering the influence of other diseases identified in the exposed cohort.
Material and methods: Radiation risks of DSD were studied in the Russian cohort of Chernobyl disaster clean-up workers (liquidators), followed-up in the system of the National Radiation Epidemiological Registry (NRER) from 1986 to 2023. The studied cases of DSD are included in three-digit headings K00–K93 of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10). Radiation risks of incidence were assessed in a cohort of 86,623 male liquidators, in which 62,864 diagnoses of DSD were identified. For the assessment of radiation risks of mortality from DSD, the cohort size was 89,567, with 2,793 deaths. The average absorbed dose of whole-body external gamma radiation accumulated by the liquidators during their work was 0.133 Gy, with a maximum dose of 1.5 Gy. Radiation risks were investigated in the framework of linear no-threshold (LNT) model of excess relative risk (ERR), as well as in the form of nonparametric estimates of relative risk (RR) in dose groups.
Results: For incidence, the estimate of the excess relative risk per dose unit is ERR/Gy=0.33, for mortality the estimate is ERR/Gy=0.81. These DSD radiation risk estimates are comparable to ERR/Gy=0.63 and ERR/Gy=0.74 for incidence and mortality from solid malignant neoplasms (MN) in the same cohort. Among liquidators with diagnoses of MN, the radiation risk of DSD incidence is statistically significantly (p=0.03) increased almost twofold, to ERR/Gy=0.64. The practical dose threshold for late mortality from DSD, estimated by the LNT model, is in the range of 0.160–0.860 Gy, with a mean value of 0.280 Gy. This is 20 times lower than the 6 Gy dose threshold adopted by the ICRP for early DSD mortality (up to 10 days after exposure). Similar estimates of dose thresholds for DSD incidence are in the range of 0.006–0.042 Gy. Nonparametric estimates of relative radiation risks (RR) confirm the correctness of LNT models of DSD radiation risk.
Conclusions: In the range of low and medium doses (up to 1.5 Gy) radiation-induced DSDs have significant properties of stochastic effects and fit into the LNT risk model. Further accumulation of data in the NRER system will make it possible to investigate the characteristics of DSD that are inherent in late tissue reactions (progression over time, increase in their severity with increasing dose and dependence on the health of the organism as a whole).
Keywords: radiation risk, Chernobyl accident, liquidators, digestive system diseases, incidence, mortality, linear no-threshold model, excess relative risk, relative risk
For citation: Chekin SYu, Gorski AI, Maksioutov MA, Karpenko SV, Tumanov KA, Shchukina NV, Kochergina EV. Assessment of Radiation Risks of Digestive System Diseases among Chernobyl Liquidators, Considering the Influence of Other Diseases Identified in Them During the Follow-up Period. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(4):55–65. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-55-65
References
1. Publikatsiya 103 Mezhdunarodnoy Komissii po Radiatsionnoy Zashchite (MKRZ) = Publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Ed. M.F.Kiselеv, N.K.Shandala. Moscow, Alana Publ., 2009. 312 p. URL: http://www.icrp.org/docs/P103_Russian.pdf (In Russ.).
2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Statement on Tissue Reactions. ICRP ref 4825-3093-1464. Approved by the Commission on April 21, 2011. URL: https://www.icrp.org/docs/2011%20Seoul.pdf.
3. Trudy MKRZ, Publikatsiya 118. Otchot MKRZ po Tkanevym Reaktsiyam, Rannim i Otdalonnym Effektam v Normal’nykh Tkanyakh i Organakh – Porogovyye Dozy dlya Tkanevykh Reaktsiy v Kontekste Radiatsionnoy Zashchity = Proceedings of the ICRP, Publication 118. ICRP Report on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects in Normal Tissues and Organs – Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in the Context of Radiation Protection. Ed. A.V.Akleyev, M.F.Kiselev. Chelyabinsk, Kniga Publ., 2012. 384 p. URL: https://www.icrp.org/docs/P118_Russian.pdf (In Russ.).
4. Little M.P., Azizova T.V., Richardson D.B., Tapio S., Bernier M.O., Kreuzer M., Cucinotta F.A., Bazyka D., Chumak V., Ivanov V.K., Veiga L.H. S., Livinski A., Abalo K., Zablotska L.B., Einstein A.J., Hamada N. Ionising Radiation and Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ. 2023;380:e072924. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072924.
5. Ivanov V.K., Maksyutov M.A., Tumanov K.A., Kochergina Ye.V., Vlasov O.K., Chekin S.Yu., Gorskiy A.I., Korelo A.M., Shchukina N.V., Zelenskaya N.S., Lashkova O.Ye., Ivanov S.A., Kaprin A.D. 35-year Experience of Functioning of the NRER as a State Information System for Monitoring the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Disaster. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2021;30;1:7–39 (In Russ.).
6. Pitkevich V.A., Ivanov V.K., Tsyb A.F., Maksyutov M.A., Matyash V.A., Shchukina N.V. Dosimetric Data of the Russian State Medical-Dosimetric Registry for Liquidators. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 1995. Special Issue 2. P. 3-44 (In Russ.).
7. Ivanov V.K., Maksioutov M.A., Chekin S.Yu., Kruglova Z.G., Petrov A.V., Tsyb A.F. Radiation-Epidemiological Analysis of Incidence of Non-Cancer Diseases among the Chernobyl Liquidators. Health Phys. 2000;78;5:495–501. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200005000-00005.
8. Ivanov V.K., Maksioutov M.A., Chekin S.Yu., Petrov A.V., Biryukov A.P., Kruglova Z.G., Matyash V.A., Tsyb A.F., Manton K.G., Kravchenko J.S. The Risk of Radiation-Induced Cerebrovascular Disease in Chernobyl Emergency Workers. Health Phys. 2006;90;3:199–207. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000175835.31663.ea.
9. Radiatsionnaya Epidemiologiya Bolezney Sistemy Krovoobrashcheniya Cheloveka Posle Radiatsionnykh Avariy = Radiation Epidemiology of Diseases of the Human Circulatory System after Radiation Accidents.Ed. V.K. Ivanov. Obninsk, Meditsinskiy Radiologicheskiy Nauchnyy Tsentr Imeni A.F. Tsyba Publ., 2016. 168 p. (In Russ.).
10. Chekin S.Yu., Maksyutov M.A., Kashcheyev V.V., Karpenko S.V., Tumanov K.A., Kochergina Ye.V., Zelenskaya N.S., Lashkova O.Ye. Assessment of Radiation Risks of Non-Oncological Diseases among Russian Participants in the Liquidation of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2021;30;1:78–93 (In Russ.).
11. Mezhdunarodnaya Statisticheskaya Klassifikatsiya Bolezney i Problem, Svyazannykh so Zdorov’yem, 10-y Peresmotr (MKB-10) = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Vol. 1 (Part 1). Geneva, WHO Publ., 1995. 698 p. (In Russ.).
12. Mezhdunarodnaya Statisticheskaya Klassifikatsiya Bolezney i Problem, Svyazannykh so Zdorov’yem, 10-y Peresmotr (MKB-10) = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Vol.1 (Part 2). Geneva, WHO, 1995. 633 p. (In Russ.).
13. Ozasa K., Shimizu Y., Suyama A., Kasagi F., Soda M., Grant E.J., Sakata R., Sugiyama H., Kodama K. Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950-2003: an Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases. Radiat. Res. 2012;177;3:229-243. doi: 10.1667/rr2629.1.
14. Breslow N.E., Day N.E. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume II. The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. IARC Scientific Publication No 82. Lyon, IARC, 1987. 406 p.
15. Preston D.L., Lubin J.H., Pierce D.A. EPICURE User’s Guide. Seattle, Hirosoft International Corp., 1993. 330 p.
16. Kashcheyev V.V., Chekin S.YU., Karpenko S.V., Maksyutov M.A., Tumanov K.A., Kochergina Ye.V., Glebova S.Ye., Ivanov S.A., Kaprin A.D. Assessment of Radiation Risks of Malignant Neoplasms among Russian Participants in the Liquidation of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2021;30;1:58–77 (In Russ.).
17. Yedinaya Mezhvedomstvennaya Informatsionno-Statisticheskaya Sistema (YEMISS) = Unified Interdepartmental Information and Statistical System (EMISS) (In Russ.). URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/3129
18. Chernobyl’skaya Katastrofa = Chernobyl Disaster. Ed. V.G.Bar’yakhtar. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka Publ., 1995. P. 468–469 (In Russ.).
19. Loginov A.S., Perederiy V.G., Bychkova V.G., Fomina A.A., Trach Ye.N. Some Features of Morphological Changes in the Digestive Tract, Clinical Course of Diseases of the Digestive Organs and Immune Status in Individuals Exposed to Radiation as a Result of the Chernobyl Accident. Terapevticheskiy Arkhiv = Therapeutic Archive. 1995;67;2:44–47 (In Russ.).
20. Bebeshko V.G., Kovalenko A.N., Chumak A.A., Bruslova Ye.M., Klimenko V.I., Yakimenko D.M., Sushko V.A. Clinical Aspects of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident at the Stage of 1986-1990 (Main Directions of Scientific Research). Vestnik Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk SSSR = Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences. 1991;11:14-18 (In Russ.).
21. Loginov A.S., Potapova V.B., Lyubchenko P.N., Dubinina Ye.B., Ul’yanova V.V. Features of the Gastric and Duodenal Mucosa in Participants in the Liquidation of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident. Terapevticheskiy Arkhiv = Therapeutic Archive. 1995;67;12:39-43 (In Russ.).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.03.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.04.2025.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 4
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-46-54
V.G. Barchukov, A.A. Bolotov, Y.N. Zhirnov, A.S. Samoylov, S.M. Shinkarev,
I.B. Ushakov, I.K. Tesnov, A.S. Galuzin, D.A. Kudinova, V.U. Lizunov
Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Radiation Protection
during Decommissioning of Radiation and Nuclear Facilities
A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
ABSTRACT
Background: The decommissioning of radiation-hazardous facilities (RHF) is a complex process that requires compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements. Effective document management and continuous personnel training are essential for ensuring safety and regulatory adherence. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can significantly simplify and automate documentation processing and management, reducing staff workload and minimizing errors. Additionally, AI helps ensure regulatory compliance by automatically tracking changes and maintaining adherence to standards. Furthermore, AI can analyze large volumes of data, identify potential risks, and propose optimal solutions based on predictive analytics.
Purpose: To develop an AI-based service capable of supporting a comprehensive and informed dialogue on RHF decommissioning. To achieve this, we selected a natural language processing (NLP) model based on Keras. A dataset was created for training the model, consisting of five key regulatory documents on radiation safety. The documents were divided into separate contexts, with experts formulating corresponding questions and answers. In total, 429 contexts were processed, and 6,405 questions and answers were generated.
Results: The model was tested in a specially developed application similar to ChatGPT, designed to help specialists find answers to questions arising during the decommissioning process. Additionally, a dynamic knowledge base update feature was implemented, allowing for real-time adjustments to regulatory documentation changes. The developed system demonstrated high accuracy in answering questions related to regulatory aspects of decommissioning. Machine learning algorithms trained on our dataset for text processing and interpretation proved effective in recognizing and handling user queries. The system was tested in various scenarios, including internal Keras model evaluations and test questions not included in the training dataset.
Conclusion: The obtained results confirmed the potential of AI technologies in managing RHF decommissioning processes. Furthermore, tests conducted on real-world data helped identify key areas for further system improvement and functional expansion.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, decommissioning of radiation and nuclear facilities, regulatory documents, radiation safety, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Keras
For citation: Barchukov VG, Bolotov AA, Zhirnov YN, Samoylov AS, Shinkarev SM, Ushakov IB, Tesnov IK, Galuzin AS, Kudinova DA, Lizunov VU. Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Radiation Protection during Decommissioning of Radiation and Nuclear Facilities. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(4):46–54. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-46-54
References
1. Devlin J., Chang M.W., Lee K., Toutanova K. BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
2. Sun C., Qiu X., Xu Y., Huang X. How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification? China National Conference on Chinese Computational Linguistics. Springer, Cham. P. 194-206.
3. Wolf T., Debut L., Sanh V., Chaumond J., Delangue C., Moi A., Rush A.M. Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. P. 38-45.
4. Radford A., Narasimhan K., Salimans T., Sutskever I. Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training. OpenAI. 2018.
5. Floridi L., Chiriatti M. GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines. 2020;30;4:681-694.
6. Liu Y., Ott M., Goyal N., Du J., Joshi M., Chen D., Stoyanov V. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. arXiv. 2019 preprint arXiv:1907.11692.
7. Gulli A., Sujit P. Deep Learning with Keras: Implementing Deep Learning Models and Neural Networks with the Power of Python. Birmingham, Packt, 2017. 318 p.
8. Anshik. AI for Healthcare: Keras and TensorFlow. AI and Machine Learning for Healthcare. New Delhi, 2021. 381 p.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.03.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.04.2025.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025. Vol. 70. № 4
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-66-77
A.N. Koterov, L.N. Ushenkova, T.M. Bulanova, N.A. Bogdanenko
Industry Bibliographical Databases: Perspectives of Use in the Fmba of Russia for Scientific Expertise in Decision-Making.
Report 2. Database on Health and Other Effects in Uranium Miners
A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: Alexey N. Koterov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
The presented review of three reports is devoted to bibliographic databases on medical-biological and other effects and indexes in nuclear workers and uranium miners (U miners), developed within the framework of the research theme of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia and registered with the state in Rospatent. Report 1 outlined introductory issues of the theory of databases, as well as registers, and provided information on the database for nuclear workers. The presented Report 2 is devoted to the database for U miners.
The purpose of creating the database for U miners was to form an accessible for abstract and full-text search repository of published data on topics relevant for conducting research examinations in the system of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, in other healthcare institutions dealing with the radiation factor, and, more broadly, for conducting fundamental and applied research in the field of effects on miners as such and, specifically, on U miners.
The database for U miners is uniform in relation to Russian and foreign research; the contribution of Russian/USSR publications (together with reports and hard-to-reach works) is 11%. The structural form of information is a catalog that includes primary (main) units of information in the form of an information file about the source (DOC), which contains the title of the publication/document, an abstract (sometimes additional information), and the full original publication (PDF, rarely HTML), available for 77 % of sources (there are 1009 sources in the database in total as of the beginning of February 2025). Among the 23 countries whose works made up the database, the largest contribution was made by the USA, the Czech Republic, Canada, Russia/USSR, Germany and France.
Visual and/or software search of material in the database is supposed to be carried out both through the information titles of catalogs, including research themes carried out using the list of abbreviations (metadata for the database), and through all the texts of the sources included in the database using the proposed programs.
The developed database has no analogues among industry databases/registers for U miners in various countries, nor among bibliographic and search systems. Through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, INIS IAEA, Web of Science, eLibrary and even through Google, either several times fewer sources on the theme were found, or a much smaller number of publications in full originals than in the proposed database. The depth of the search for works on the effects and indexes for U miners in world search systems is significantly inferior to the developed database (1940–1950s versus 1920–1930s).
It is concluded that the presented database on U miners is unique for examination within the framework of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia and other healthcare institutions, and has no complete replacement as a scientific reference and expert depot of sources.
Keywords: bibliographic database, uranium miners, health effects
For citation: Koterov AN, Ushenkova LN, Bulanova TM, Bogdanenko NA. Industry Bibliographical Databases: Perspectives of Use in the Fmba of Russia for Scientific Expertise in Decision-Making. Report 2. Database on Health and Other Effects in Uranium Miners. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70(4):66–77. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-4-66-77
References
1. UNSCEAR 2016. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annex. Annex D. Biological Effects of Selected Internal Emitters-Uranium. United Nations. New York, 2017. P. 361-502.
2. Petrukhin N.P. Istoriya Dobychi Urana = History of Uranium Mining. Moscow, Gornorudnyy Divizion Goskorporatsii Rosatom Publ., 2020. 438 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kathren R.L., Tolmachev S.Y. The US Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR): a Five-Decade Follow-up of Plutonium and Uranium Workers. Health Phys. 2019;117;2:118-132. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000963.
4. Archer V.E., Coons T., Saccomanno G., Hong D.Y. Latency and the Lung Cancer Epidemic among United States Uranium Miners. Health Phys. 2004;87;5:480-489. doi: 10.1097/01.hp.0000133216.72557.ab.
5. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Bulanova T.M., Bogdanenko N.A. Industry Bibliographic Databases: Prospects for Use in the FMBA of Russia for Scientific Expertise in Decision-Making. Report 1. General Issues and a Database on Medical, Biological and other Effects in Workers in the Nuclear Industry. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost’ = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2025;70;2:88-106 (In Russ.). doi:10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-2-88-106.
6. Dublin L.I., Vane R.J. Occupation Hazards and Diagnostic Signs: A Guide to Impairments to be Looked for in Hazardous Occupations. Department of Labor United States of America. Bulletin No. 41. Washington, United States Government Printing Office, 1941. 70 p.
7. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N. Baza Dannykh (Baza Istochnikov) ob Effektakh Luchevykh i Neluchevykh Vozdeystviy dlya Shakhterov Uranovykh Rudnikov Razlichnykh Stran Mira = Database (Source Database) on the Effects of Radiation and Non-Radiation Exposure for Uranium Miners in Different Countries of the World. Certificate of State Registration 2024623706. Published 08.22.2024. Bulletin No.2 (In Russ.).
8. Behounek F. Uber Die Verhaltnisse der Radioaktivitiant Uranpecherzbergbaurevvoiner St. Joachimsthaikn. Bohmen. Physic Zsch. 1927;28:333-334.
9. Fabianova E., Szeszenia-Dabrowska N., Kjaerheim K., Boffetta P. Occupational Cancer in Central European Countries. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999;107;2:279-282. doi: 10.1289/ehp.107-1566282.
10. Pirchan A., Sikl H. Cancer of Lung in Miners of Jachymov (Joachimstal). Report of Cases Observed in 1929-1930. Am. J. Cancer. 1932;16;4:681-722.
11. Peller S. Lung Cancer among Mine Workers in Joachimsthal. Hum. Biol. (Baltimore). 1939;11:130-143.
12. Commodore A.R., Lipscomb F.E. Military Hygiene in Transition. Public Health. 1955;68:97–101.
13. Hueper W.C. Industrial Management and Occupational Cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1946;131;9:738–741. doi: 10.1001/jama.1946.02870260022005.
14. Bykhovskiy A.V. Gigiyenicheskiye Voprosy pri Podzemnoy Razrabotke Uranovykh Rud = Hygienic Issues in Underground Mining of Uranium Ores. Moscow Publ., 1963. 332 p. (In Russ.).
15. Saurov M.M., Svyakhovskaya N.V. Some Methodological Approaches to a Retrospective Epidemiological Study of Occupational Pulmonary Morbidity in Uranium Mines (1986). Izbrannyye Materialy Byulleten’ po Radiatsionnoy Meditsine = Selected Materials of the Bulletin on Radiation Medicine. 2016;1:816-824 (In Russ.).
16. Gneusheva G.I., Saurov M.M., Popova M.P., Svyakhovskaya N.V. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Miners of an Iron-Uranium Mine (1986). Izbrannyye Materialy Byulleten’ po Radiatsionnoy Meditsine = Selected Materials of the Bulletin on Radiation Medicine. 2016;1:824-830 (In Russ.).
17. Belugina R.N. Epidemiological Study of Mortality among Miners at an Iron-Uranium Mine (1986). Izbrannyye Materialy Byulleten’ po Radiatsionnoy Meditsine = Selected Materials of the Bulletin on Radiation Medicine. 2016;2:712-717 (In Russ.).
18. Shalayev I.L., Glushinskiy M.V., Tokarev N.M., Byzov E.V. Epidemiological Study of Mortality from Lung Cancer in Uranium Mine Miners (1986). Izbrannyye Materialy Byulleten’ po Radiatsionnoy Meditsine = Selected Materials of the Bulletin on Radiation Medicine. 2016;2:717-724 (In Russ.).
19. Malashenko A.V. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Conditions of Development of Sedimentary Uranium ore Deposit. Proceedings of the 2-go Otraslevogo Simpoziuma po Gigiyene, Dozimetrii i Profpatologii pri Dobyche i Pererabotke Uranovoy Rudy = 2nd Industry Symposium on Hygiene, Dosimetry and Occupational Pathology in the Extraction and Processing of Uranium Ore. Leningrad Publ., 1986. P. 94-95 (In Russ.).
20. Malashenko A.V. Sostoyaniye Bronkholegochnoy Sistemy Gornorabochikh, Zanyatykh na Razrabotke i Osvoyenii Osadochno-Glubinnogo Mestorozhdeniya Uranovoy Rudy = The State of the Bronchopulmonary System of Miners Engaged in the Development and Exploration of a Sedimentary-Deep Deposit of Uranium Ore. Doctor’s Thesis (Med.) / FMBA Rossii. Moscow, Institut Biofiziki Publ., 2006. 326 p. (In Russ.).
21. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Ed. J.P.T.Higgins, T.James, J.Chandler, et al. Chichester, Willey Blackwell, 2019. 694 p. doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.
22. Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22;2:338-342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
23. Gusenbauer M., Haddaway N.R. Which Academic Search Systems are Suitable for Systematic Reviews or Meta-Analyses? Evaluating Retrieval Qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other Resources. Res. Synth. Methods. 2020;11;2:181–217. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378.
24. Martin-Martin A., Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E., Lopez-Cozar E.D. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a Multidisciplinary Comparison of Coverage Via Citations. Scientometrics. 2021;126;1:871–906. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
25. Kreuzer M., Sommer M., Deffner V., Bertke S., Demers P.A., Kelly-Reif K., et al. Lifetime Excess Absolute Risk for Lung Cancer Due to Exposure to Radon: Results of the Pooled Uranium Miners Cohort Study PUMA. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2024;63;1:7–16. doi:10.1007/s00411-023-01049-w.
26. Rage E., Richardson D.B., Demers P.A., Do M., Fenske N., Kreuzer M., et al. PUMA - Pooled Uranium Miners Analysis: Cohort profile. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020;77;3:194-200. doi:10.1136/oemed-2019-105981.
27. Richardson D.B., Rage E., Demers P.A., Do M.T., DeBono N., Fenske N., et al. Mortality among Uranium Miners in North America and Europe: the Pooled Uranium Miners Analysis (PUMA). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021;50;2:633–643. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa195.
28. Kelly-Reif K., Bertke S.J., Rage E., Demers P.A., Fenske N., Deffner V., et al. Radon and Lung Cancer in the Pooled Uranium Miners Analysis (PUMA): Highly Exposed Early Miners and all Miners. Occup. Environ. Med. 2023;80;7:385–391. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108532.
29. Richardson D.B., Rage E., Demers P.A., Do M.T., Fenske N., Deffner V., et al. Lung Cancer and Radon: Pooled Analysis of Uranium Miners Hired in 1960 or Later. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022;130;5:57010. 8 p. doi: 10.1289/EHP10669.
30. Uranium Atlas. Facts and Data about the Raw Material of the Atomic Age. Ed. by C.Biegert, H.Hamm. Minnesota, Switzerland and Honor the Earth, an Indigenous Foundation, 2020. 52 p.
31. Botbayev D., Ravegnini G., Sammarini G., Kazymbet P., Cilli E., Serventi P., et al. Absence of Mutations in the Human Interferon Alpha-2b Gene in Workers Chronically Exposed to Ionising Radiation. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 2019;70;2:104–108. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2019-70-3202.
32. Dustov A., Mirojov G., Yakubova M., Umarov S., Ishankulova D., Eliasziw M., Brugge D. Uranium Mine Proximity, Immune Function, and Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Tajikistan. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2013;76;22:1261–1268. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2013.836694.
33. Bednaryk O.M., Filipchenko L.L., Pan’kova A.O., Kryvoshei L.O., Slinchenko M.Z. Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of Lung Cancer in Miners of Krivoy Rog Iron-Ore Region and of Uranium Mines of Zhovti Vody. Lik Sprava. 2004;1:84-87 (In Ua.).
34. Duggan M.J., Soilleux P.J., Strong J.C., Howell D.M. The Exposure of United Kingdom Miners to Radon. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1970;27;2:106-109. doi: 10.1136/oem.27.2.106.
35. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P. “Healthy Worker Effect” in Terms of Overall Mortality and Mortality from Malignant Neoplasms among Personnel of Nuclear and Chemical Industry Enterprises: Meta-Analyses. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost’ = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68;4:43-50 (In Russ.). doi: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-43-50.
36. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Dibirgadzhiyev I.G., Bulanova T.M. Comparison of the Risk of Total Mortality for Workers in the Nuclear Industry, Uranium Miners and other Professions with the risk of Passive Smoking (Meta-Analyses). Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost’ = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69;5:75–86 (In Russ.). doi: 10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-5-75-86.
37. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Dibirgadzhiyev I.G., Kalinina M.V. Mortality from all Causes and from All Cancers for Workers in the Nuclear Industry and Uranium Miners Compared with the Most Harmful/Dangerous Professions (Synthetic Study). Collection of Scientific Papers Zdorov’ye i Okruzhayushchaya Sreda = Health and Environment. Issue 34. Ed. S.I.Sychik, et al. Gomel’, Gomel’skaya Prauda Publ., 2024. P. 59-69 (In Russ.).
38. Alif S.M., Sim M.R., Ho C., Glass D.C. Cancer and Mortality in Coal Mine Workers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2022;79;5:347–357. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107498.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.03.2025. Accepted for publication: 25.04.2025.