JOURNAL DESCRIPTION
The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.
Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.
Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.
The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.
Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.
The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.
Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.
The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.
Issues journals
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-50-60
I.V. Ivanov1, 2, V.I. Burmistrov1, E.I. Matkevich3
Assessment of the Radiation Situation during Short-Term Flights to the Moon
1 N.F. Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health, Moscow, Russia
2 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
3 A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: I.V. Ivanov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Background: The issue of assessing the features of factors affecting the formation of radiation doses of astronauts while in orbit of the Moon and on its surface remains insufficiently studied, which is important for ensuring the anti-radiation safety of astronauts on lunar missions.
Purpose: To analyze the factors influencing the formation of the radiation dose of astronauts at the stage of finding the spacecraft in orbit of the Moon and the lander on its surface.
Material and methods: The features of the dose load levels on astronauts at the stages of the Moon’s orbit and on the Moon’s surface are analyzed and generalized, calculation methods are used taking into account the orbit of the spacecraft around the Moon, the anti-radiation properties of the materials of the lander and spacesuit and the time spent in them during a short-term lunar mission.
Results: The total radiation doses of astronauts for 14 days, calculated according to dosimetric measurements during the years of low solar activity (2009 and 2018‒2019), are 19.5‒23.2 mSv for astronauts staying in a spacecraft in lunar orbit, and from 22,7 to 24,0 mSv for astronauts on the Lunar surface, depending on the mass thickness of the protection at the maximum permissible 250 mSv for 1 month. An increase in the mass thickness of the anti-radiation protection of the lander in the equivalent of aluminum from 1.5 to 3-5 g/cm2 and the lunar spacesuit in the equivalent of aluminum from 0.2 to 0.5‒1 g/cm2 will reduce the total radiation dose of astronauts no more than 1.3 times during a 14-day stay on the surface of the moon. The results indicate that in order to minimize the radiation doses that astronauts receive during a lunar mission, it is important to take into account the forecast of solar activity in order to optimize the launch time of the spacecraft in the «windows» with minimal levels of radiation exposure.
Conclusion: When predicting radiation hazard levels for astronauts during a short-term lunar mission, it is necessary to assess the levels of exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation both in the orbit of the Moon, depending on the lunar trajectory of the spacecraft, and on the surface of the Moon, taking into account the time spent in the lunar module and in a spacesuit, as well as levels of solar activity. It is important to take into account the analyzed features of the formation of cosmonauts’ radiation doses while orbiting the Moon and on its surface when predicting the time limits of the lunar mission, anti-radiation protection of astronauts and their compliance with the regulatory limits of exposure.
Keywords: space flights, the moon, astronauts, ionizing radiation, radiation doses, anti-radiation protection, lunar module, spacesuit
For citation: Ivanov IV, Burmistrov VI, Matkevich EI. Assessment of the Radiation Situation during Short-Term Flights to the Moon. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):50–60. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-50-60
References
1. Grigoryev Yu.G., Ushakov I.B., Shafirkin A.V. Peculiarities of Radiation Normalization in the USSR (Russia) and the USA Concerning to Long-Term Pilotable Space Flights. Gigiyena i Sanitariya = Hygiene and Sanitation. 2017;96;9:861-867. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-9-861-867 (In Russ.).
2. Samoylov A.S., Ushakov I.B, Shurshakov V.A. Radiation Exposure During the Orbital and Interplanetary Spaceflights: Monitoring and Protection. Ekologiya Cheloveka = Human Ecology. 2019;1:4-9 (In Russ.).
3. Mitrikas V.G., Khorosheva E.G. Effective Doses from Ionizing Radiation Exposure of Cosmonauts During Extravehicular Activity. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2018;52;2:29–33. DOI 10.21687/0233-528X-2018-52-2-29-33 (In Russ.).
4. Shafirkin A.V., Bengin V.V., Bondarenko V.A., Mitrikas V.G., Panasyuk M.I., Tsetlin V.V., Shurshakov V.A. Dose Loads and Total Radiation Risk for Cosmonauts in Long-Term Missions to the Orbital Station Mir and International Space Station. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2018;52;1:12–23. DOI 10.21687/0233-528X-2018-52-1-12-23 (In Russ.).
5. Bondarenko V.A., Mitrikas V.G., Tsetlin V.V. Characteristics of the Iss Radiation Environment in the Period of the 24th Solar Cycle. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2019;53;5:17–21. DOI 10.21687/0233-528X-2019-53-5-17-21 (In Russ.).
6. Mitrikas V.G. Some Aspects of the Radiation Exposure of Cosmonauts Traversing the Earth’s Magnetosphere. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2021;55;3:51–56. DOI 10.21687/0233-528X-2021-55-3-51-56 (In Russ.).
7. Mitrikas V.G., Khorosheva E.G. Effective Doses from Ionizing Radiation Exposure of Cosmonauts During Extravehicular Activity. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2016;50;3:23–29 (In Russ.).
8. Mitrikas V.G. Estimation of Ionizing Radiation Effective Doses to Crews of the International Space Station by the Method of Calculation Modeling. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2015;49;3:5–11 (In Russ.).
9. Mitrikas V.G. Dinamicheskaya Model Radiatsionnoy obstanovki dlya Operativnogo Obespecheniya Radiatsionnoy Bezopasnosti Kosmonavtov v Kosmicheskom Polete = A Dynamic Model of the Radiation Situation for Operational Provision of Radiation Safety of Astronauts in Space Flight. Avtoref. diss. ... doct. Technical Sciences. Moscow Publ., 2000. 36 p. (In Russ.).
10. Bondarenko V.A. Otsenka Radiatsionnykh Nagruzok na Kosmonavtov Mks s Ispolzovaniyem Geometricheskoy Modeli Tela Cheloveka = Assessment of Radiation Loads on the ISS Astronauts Using a Geometric Model of the Human Body. Avtoref. diss. ... kand. of Technical Sciences. Moscow Publ., 2007. 27 p. (In Russ.).
11. Orlov O.I., Panasyuk M.I., Shurshakov V.A. Radiation Factor in Lunar Missions. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2019;53;4:5–18 (In Russ.).
12. STATE STANDARD 15484-81 Ionizing Radiations and Their Measurements. Terms and definitions. Moscow Publ., 1986 (In Russ.).
13. SP 2.6.1.2612-10. Basic Sanitary Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB-99/2010). Moscow Publ., 2010 (In Russ.).
14. Spence H.E., Golightly M.J., Joyce C.J., Looper M.D., Schwadron N.A., Smith S.S., Townsend L.W., Wilson J. and Zeitlin C. Relative Contributions of Galactic Cosmic Rays and Lunar Proton «Albedo» to Dose and Dose Rates Near the Moon. Space Weather. 2013;11:643–650. doi:10.1002/2013SW000995. URL: http://www.d54x.ru/articles/Luna/Luna91.pdf.
15. Novikov L.S. Kosmicheskoye Materialovedeniye = Space Materials Science. Moscow, Max Press Publ., 2014. 448 p.
(In Russ.).
16. Zhang S., Wimmer-Schweingruber R.F., Yu J., Wang C., Fu Q., Zou Y., Sun Y., Wang C., Hou D., Böttcher S.I., Burmeister S., Seimetz L., Schuster B., Knierim V., Shen G., Yuan B., Lohf H., Guo J., Xu Z., Freiherr von Forstner J.L., Kulkarni S.R., Xu H., Xue C., Li J., Zhang Z., Zhang H., Berger T., Matthiä D., Hellweg C.E., Hou X., Cao J., Chang Z., Zhang B., Chen Y., Geng H., Quan Z. First Measurements of the Radiation Dose on the Lunar Surface. Sci. Adv. 2020;6;39:eaaz1334. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334.
17. Bezrodnykh I.P. Kosmicheskaya Radiatsiya – Osnovnaya Ugroza pri Kosmicheskikh Poletakh = Space Radiation Is the Main Threat During Space Flights. ICI RAS. Moscow Publ., 2021. 39 p. URL: https://studylib.ru/doc/6428972/bezrodnyh-i.p.-kosmicheskaya-radiaciya‒osnovnaya-ugroza-pri
(In Russ.).
18. Wimmer-Schweingruber R.F., Yu J., Böttcher S.I., Zhang S., Burmeister S., Lohf H. at all. The Lunar Lander Neutron and Dosimetry (LND) Experiment on Chang’E 4. Space Sci. 2020;216;104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00725-3.
19. Kalmykov N.N., Kulikov G.V., Roganova T.M. Galactic Cosmic Rays. V. 1. Model Kosmosa = A Model of the Cosmos. Ed. Panasyuk M.I. Moscow Publ., 2007. P. 62-95 (In Russ.).
20. Belov A.V., Kurt V.G. Solar Cosmic Rays. V. 1. Model Kosmosa = A Model of the Cosmos. Ed. Panasyuk M.I. Moscow Publ., 2007. P. 293-313 (In Russ.).
21. Ionizing Radiation in Earth’s Atmosphere and in Space Near Earth. Wallace Friedberg Kyle Copeland Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Federal Aviation Administration. Oklahoma City, OK 73125. P. 1-32.
22. Denisov A.N., Kuznetsov N.V., Nymmik R.A., Panasyuk M.I., Sobolevskiy N.M. On the Problem of the Radiation Situation on the Moon. Kosmicheskiye Issledovaniya = Cosmic Research. 2010;48;6:524-531 (In Russ.).
23. Bezrodnykh I.P., Morozova E.I., Petrukovich A.A., Semenov V.T. Evaluation of Optimal Parameters of Screens for Protecting Electronic Systems of Spacecraft from Ionizing Radiation. Voprosy Elektromekhaniki. Trudy VNIIEM = Electromechanical Matters. VNIIEM Studies. 2012;131;6:15-18 (In Russ.).
24. Bezrodnykh I.P. Faktory Kosmicheskogo Prostranstva, Vliyayushchiye na Issledovaniye i Osvoyeniye Luny = Factors of Outer Space Affecting the Exploration and Exploration of the Moon. Moscow Publ., 2014 // https://studylib.ru/doc/2735279/bezrodnyh-i.p.-iki-ran-spisok-normativnyh (In Russ.).
25. GOST 25645.150-90. Cosmic Galactic Rays. A Model for Changing Particle Flows. Moscow Publ., 1991 (In Russ.).
26. GOST 25645.165-2001. Cosmic Solar Rays. Probabilistic Model of Proton Fluxes. Gosstandart of Russia. Moscow Publ., 2001 (In Russ.).
27. URL: https://monamir.ru/Аполлон-8; https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Аполлон-10.
28. Jones E.M. A Running Start- Apollo 17 up to Powered Descent Initiation. Apollo 17 Lunar Surface Journal. NASA (1995); Аполлон-17 URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Аполлон-17.
29. Petrov V.M., Mitrikas V.G., Teltsov M.V., Akatov YU.V., Bengin V.V., Bondarenko V.A., et al. Radiation Dosimetry in Space Flight. V. 1. Model Kosmosa = A Model of the Cosmos. Ed. Panasyuk M.I. Moscow Publ., 2007. P. 642-667 (In Russ.).
30. Schwadron N.A., Baker T., Blake B., Case A.W., Cooper J.F., Golightly M., et al. Lunar Radiation Environment and Space Weathering from the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER).
J. Geophys. Res. 2012;117:E00H13.
31. Schwadron N.A., Rahmanifard F., Wilson J., Jordan A.P., Spence H.E., Joyce C.J., et al. Update on the Worsening Particle Radiation Environment Observed by CRaTER and Implications for Future Human Deep-Space Exploration. Space Weather. 2018;16:289–303.
32. The Effect of the Varying Distance on the Effective Shielding by the Moon Is Included in the Dose Rates Published by the CRaTER Team, as Discussed on Their Website. Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER). URL: http://prediccs.sr.unh.edu/craterweb/algorithms.html.
33. Kuznetsov N.V., Nymmik R.A., Panasyuk M.I., Denisov A.N., Sobolevsky N.M. Assessment of Radiation Risk for Astronauts on the Moon. Kosmicheskiye Issledovaniya = Cosmic Research. 2012;50;3:224-228 (In Russ.).
34. Kurt V.G. Solar Flares. V. 1. Model Kosmosa = A Model of the Cosmos. Ed. Panasyuk M.I. Moscow Publ., 2007. P. 62-95.
35. Wimmer-Schweingruber R.F., Yu J., Böttcher S.I., Zhang S., Burmeister S., Lohf H., et al. Planetary Science. First Measurements of the Radiation Dose on the Lunar Surface. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaaz1334.
36. Limits of radiation Safety (NRS-99/2009) SP. 2.6.1.758-99. Moscow Publ., 2009 (In Russ.).
37. GOST 25645.215-85 BREKAKP. Safety Regulations for the Duration of Flights up to 3 Years. Moscow Publ., 1986 (In Russ.).
38. Limits of Cosmonauts’ Irradiation for Orbital Near-Earth Space Flights. Workbook MU 2.6.1.44-03-2004. Мoscow Publ., 2004 (In Russ.).
39. Ushakov I.B., Grigoryev Yu.G., Shafirkin A.V., Shurshakov V.A. Substantiation of Dose Limits for a New Normative Document on Radiation Safety of Long-Duration Space Missions at Orbit Altitudes of up to 500 km. Aviakosmicheskaya i Ekologicheskaya Meditsina = Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2016;50;1:39–54 (In Russ.).
40. Publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP). Ed. Kiselev M.F., Shandala N.K. Moscow Publ., 2009 (In Russ.).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-61-66
T.V. Vishnevskaya1, D.S. Isubakova1, M.Yu. Tsyplenkova1, O.S. Tsymbal1, I.V. Milto1, 2, R.M. Takhauov1, 2
Comparative Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Cytogenetic Studies of Employees of the Object of Use of Ionizing Radiation
1 Seversk Biophysical Research Center of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Seversk, Russia
2 Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia
Contact person: T.V. Vishnevskaya, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To conduct a comparative retrospective analysis of the results of cytogenetic studies of workers at facilities using ionizing radiation in 2003 and 2018.
Material and methods: The material for the study was the venous blood of workers at facilities using ionizing radiation. The study was conducted on conditionally healthy workers (n = 11), of which 2 groups were formed: the control group (blood sampling and cytogenetic study of blood lymphocytes were carried out in 2003) and the study group (blood sampling was carried out in 2018). For all examined individuals, blood lymphocytes were cultured and standard cytogenetic analysis followed by statistical processing of the results.
Results: A comparative retrospective analysis showed that in the study group (2018) compared to the control group (2003), the frequency of chromatid fragments was reduced (p = 0.0452). The frequencies of other types of cytogenetic disorders studied (aberrant cells, chromosomal fragments, dicentric and circular chromosomes) do not differ between groups.
Cytogenetic abnormalities in blood lymphocytes are a highly sensitive measure of the degree of radiation exposure in the early and late periods after exposure and can be used as a biological indicator of ionizing radiation.
The absence of differences in indicators of radiation exposure markers may be due to the large interval of time that elapsed after irradiation until the moment of examination (15 years), during which lymphocytes with chromosomal aberrations were eliminated from the blood. In the future, for the completeness of the retrospective analysis and the accuracy of the result, it is planned to conduct a study on a larger sample with a shorter time interval between cytogenetic studies.
Conclusion: The result of this work allows us to supplement the understanding of the mutation process in the somatic cells of individuals exposed to ionizing radiation in the course of professional activities and indicates genotoxicity.
Keywords: occupational exposure, cytogenetic study, retrospective analysis, chromosomal aberrations, blood lymphocytes
For citation: Vishnevskaya TV, Isubakova DS, Tsyplenkova MYu, Tsymbal OS, Milto IV, Takhauov RM.Comparative Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Cytogenetic Studies of Employees of the Object of Use of Ionizing Radiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):61–66. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-61-66
References
1. Akleyev A.V., Krestinina L.Yu., Varfolomeeva T.A., Ostroumova E.V., Pushkarev S.A., Shalaginov S.A., Khudyakova O.I., Veremeeva G.A., Vozilova A.V., Hall P. Medico-Biological Effects of Chronic Exposure to Ionizing Radiation on Humans. Medical Science and Education of the Urals. 2008;9;2:8–10 (In Russ.).
2. Ivanitskaya M.V., Isayeva L.N., Yachmenev V.A., Govorun A.P., Liksonov V.I., Potapov V.N., Chesnokov A.V., Shcherbak S.B. Distribution of 137Cs Pollution Levels in the Floodplain of the Techa River in the Village of Brodokalmak. Problems of Ecology of the Southern Urals. 1996;1:7–18 (In Russ.).
3. Akleyev A.V., Degteva M.O., Krestinina L.Yu. Radioepidemiological Studies in the Urals: Outcomes and Future Directions. Radiatsionnaya Gigiyena = Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(4):31–44. DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2021-14-4-31-44 (In Russ.).
4. Neronova E.G., Aleksanin S.S. Evaluation of Cytogenetic Parameters in Persons Who Have Contacted with Ionizing Radiation. Mediko-Biologicheskiye i Sotsialno-Psikhologicheskiye Problemy Bezopasnosti v Chrezvychaynykh Situatsiyakh = Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2014;1:70–76 (In Russ.).
5. Petushkova V.V., Pelevina I.I., Serebryanyy A.M., Kogarko I.N., Kogarko B.S., Akleyev A.V., Azizova T.V., Neifakh E.A., Aleshchenko A.V., Ganeyev I.I., Ktitorova O.V. Some Approaches to the Analysis of the Structure of the Adaptive Response in Occupational Exposure. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2020;29;4:97–105. DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2020-29-4-97-105 (In Russ.).
6. Volkov A.N., Nacheva L.V. Cytogenetic Methods in the Practice of Modern Biomedical Research. Part I: History and Theoretical Foundations of Human Cytogenetics. Fundamentalnaya i Klinicheskaya Meditsina = Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2021;6;4:142–150. DOI: 10.23946/2500-0764-2021-6-4-142-150 (In Russ.).
7. Aleksanin S.S., Slozina N.M., Neronova E.G. Emergencies and the Human Genome. Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergency Situations and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters, All-Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine A.M. Nikiforova. St. Petersburg Publ., 2010. 84 p. (In Russ.).
8. Takhauov R.M., Karpov A.B., Zerenkov A.G., Ovchinnikov A.V., Izmestiev K.M., Spasibenko P.V., et al. Medical and Dosimetric Register of the Personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant – a Basis for Assessing the Effects of Chronic Exposure. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya = Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2015;55;5:467–473 (In Russ.).
9. Takhauov R.M., Karpov A.B., Albach E.N., Khalyuzova M.V., Freidin M.B., Litviakov N.V., Sazonov A.E., Isubakova D.S., Bolshakov M.A., Mezheritskiy S.A., Mironova E.B., Semenova J.V., Nekrasov G.B., Izosimov A.S., Gagarin A.A., Brendakov R.V., Maksimov D.E., Ermolaev Y.D. The Bank of Biological Samples Representing Individuals Exposed to Long-Term Ionizing Radiation at Various Doses. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2015;13;2:72–78. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2014.0035.
10. Snigireva G.P. Biological Dosimetry Based on Cytogenetic Analysis. Bulletin of the Russian Scientific Center for Roentgen Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2011;11;1:18 (In Russ.).
11. Khalyuzova M.V., Tsyganov M.M., Isubakova D.S., Bronikovskaya E.V., Usova T.V., Litvyakov N.V., Karpov A.B., Takhauova L.R., Takhauov R.M. Genome-Wide Associative Study of the Association of Polymorphic Loci with an Increased Frequency of Chromosomal Aberrations in Individuals Exposed to Prolonged Radiation Exposure. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64;4:32–40. DOI: 10.12737/article_5d1103efefe893.65968050 (In Russ.).
12. Volkov A.N., Rytenkova O.I. Cytogenetic Methods in the Practice of Modern Biomedical Research. Part III: Numerical Anomalies of the Human Karyotype. Fundamentalnaya i Klinicheskaya Meditsina = Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2022;7;3:85–96. DOI: 10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-3-85-96 (In Russ.).
13. Apsalikov K.N., Muldagaliev T.Zh., Belikhina T.I., Tanatova Z.A., Kenzhina L.B. Analysis and Retrospective Evaluation of the Results of Cytogenetic Examinations of the Population of Kazakhstan Exposed to Radiation as a Result of Nuclear Weapons Testing at the Semipalatinsk Test Site, and Their Descendants. Medico-Biological Problems of Life. 2013:9;1:42–49 (In Russ.).
14. Cherednichenko O.G. Stable Aberrations of Chromosomes During Long-Term Cultivation of Lymphocytes and in the Process of Formation of a Radioadaptive Response. Bulletin of KazNU. Biological Series. 2011;1;47:49–53 (In Russ.).
15. Neronova E., Slozina N., Nikiforov A. Chromosome Alterations in Cleanup Workers Sampled Years after the Chernobyl Accident. Radiat. Res. 2003;160;1:46–51. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)160[0046:CAICWS]2.0.CO;2.
16. Yarmonenko S.P., Vaynson A.A. Radiobiology of Man and Animals. Tutorial. Moscow, Higher school Publ., 2004. 549 p. (In Russ.).
17. Isubakova D.S., Litvyakov N.V., Tsymbal O.S., Usova T.V., Tsyplenkova M.Yu., Milto I.V., Takhauov R.M. Search for Polymorphic Variants of Candidate genes of Individual Radiosensitivity. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2022;21;4:79–87. DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2022-4-79-87 (In Russ.).
18. Vozilova A.V., Akhmadullina Yu.R. The Study of Individual Radiosensitivity in Humans Based on the Assessment of the Frequency of Chromosomal Aberrations and Micronuclei in T-lymphocytes of Peripheral Blood. Genetika = Russian Journal of Genetics. 2019;55;10:1180–1188 (In Russ.).
19. Ivanova T.V. Cytogenetic Research Methods: the Possibilities of Laboratory Diagnostics and Information Content for the Doctor. Therapist. 2020; 5:12–19 (In Russ.).
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The research was carried out within the framework of the state task, the research topic is «Studying the relationship of single-nucleotide polymorphisms of cell cycle genes with the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in blood lymphocytes of employees of the Siberian Chemical Plant».
Contribution. Vishnevskaya T.V. – preparation of the text of the article, analysis and interpretation of data, conducting experiments, collection and analysis of literary material, development of the concept and design of the study; Isubakova D.S. – development of the concept and design of the study, internal audit; Tsyplenkova M.Yu., Tsymbal O.S. – conducting experiments and statistical data processing; Milto I.V. – scientific editing of the text, verification of critically important intellectual content; Takhauov R.M. – development of the concept and design of the study, approval of the final version of the manuscript.
Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-73-76
Dmitry E. Kalinkin1, 2, Ivan V. Milto1, 2, Anas R. Takhauov1, Lilia R. Takhauova1, 2,
Yulia A. Samoilova3, Galina V. Gorina1, Olesya V. Litvinova1, Ravil M. Takhauov1, 2
The Sublimate Production Cohort of the Siberian Chemical Plant (Dosimetric Characteristics)
1 Seversk Biophysical Research Center, Seversk, Russia
2 Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia
3 Siberian Federal Scientific Clinical Center, Seversk, Russia
Contact person: Dmitry E. Kalinkin, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Uranium, which is the raw material basis of the nuclear industry, is capable of causing adverse medical and biological consequences for workers who come into contact with its compounds in the course of their professional activities. In order to study this effect and to study in detail the biomedical consequences of the effects of uranium compounds on the body of personnel of nuclear power facilities, it is necessary to form a cohort of persons engaged in work with uranium compounds. One of the key elements of the uranium conversion technology carried out within the framework of sublimation production is the production of raw uranium hexafluoride for subsequent isotopic enrichment.
Purpose: To form and characterize a cohort of sublimate production of the personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant involved in work with uranium compounds in the period 1953–2000.
Material and methods: The source of information was the regional medical dosimetric register of Seversk Biophysical Research Center, containing information on all current and former employees of the Siberian Chemical Plant (about 65,000 people) from the moment of the company’s foundation to the present.
Results: A cohort of Siberian Chemical Plant workers involved in work with uranium compounds in the period 1953–2000 has been formed and described. The cohort consists of 577 people (475 men and 102 women). Biomedical information and dosimetric information about the employees included in the cohort are included in the created database of the personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant involved in working with uranium compounds in the period 1953–2000.
Conclusion: The formed cohort and database will allow conducting epidemiological studies to assess the morbidity and mortality of personnel due to malignant neoplasms, as well as making scientifically sound conclusions about the role of uranium compounds in the occurrence and mortality due to malignant neoplasms.
Keywords: uranium compounds, personnel of radiation hazardous production, cohort formation, epidemiology
For citation: Kalinkin DE, Milto IV, Takhauov AR, Takhauova LR, Samoilova YA, Gorina GV, Litvinova OV, Takhauov RM. The Sublimate Production Cohort of the Siberian Chemical Plant (Dosimetric Characteristics). Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):73–76. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-73-76
References
1. Surdyk S., Itani M., Al-Lobaidy M., Kahale L.A., Farha A., Dewachi O., Akl E.A., Habib R.R. Weaponised Uranium and Adverse Health Outcomes in Iraq: a Systematic Reviewю BMJ Glob. Health. 2021;6;2:e004166. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004166.
2. Tirmarche M., Apostoaei I., Blanchardon E., Ellis E.D., Gilbert E., Harrison J.D., Laurier D., Marsh J.W., Sokolnikov M., Wakeford R., Zhivin S. ICRP Publication 150: Cancer Risks from Plutonium and Uranium Exposure. Ann. ICRP. 2021;50;4:1–143. DOI: 10.1177/01466453211028020.
3. Tomasek L. Lung Cancer Lifetime Risks in Cohort Studies of Uranium Miners. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2020;191;2:171–175. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa143.
4. Thandra K.C., Barsouk A., Saginala K., Aluru J.S., Barsouk A. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer // Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021;25;1:45–52. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2021.103829.
5. Kelly-Reif K., Sandler D.P., Shore D., Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Troester M.A., Nylander-French L., Richardson D.B. Radon and Cancer Mortality among Underground Uranium Miners in the Příbram Region of the Czech Republic. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020;63;10:859–867. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23167.
6. da Silva F.M.R. Júnior, Tavella R.A., Fernandes C.L.F., Dos Santos M. Genetic Damage in Coal and Uranium Miners. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ Mutagen. 2021;866:503348. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503348.
7. Golden A.P., Milder C.M., Ellis E.D., Anderson J.L., Boice Jr J.D., Bertke S.J., Zablotska L.B. Cohort Profile: four Early Uranium Processing Facilities in the US and Canada. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2021;97;6:833–847. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1917786.
8. Semenova Y., Pivina L., Zhunussov Y., Zhanaspayev M., Chirumbolo S., Muzdubayeva Z., Bjørklund G. Radiation-Related Health Hazards to Uranium Miners. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020;27;28:34808–34822. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09590-7.
9. Richardson D.B., Rage E., Demers P.A., Do M.T., Fenske N., Deffner V., Kreuzer M., Samet J., Bertke S.J., Kelly-Reif K., Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Tomasek L., Zablotska L.B., Wiggins C., Laurier D. Lung Cancer and Radon: Pooled Analysis of Uranium Miners Hired in 1960 or Later. Environ Health Perspect. 2022;130;5:57010. DOI: 10.1289/EHP10669.
10. Rage E., Richardson D.B., Demers P.A., Do M.T., Fenske N., Kreuzer M., Samet J., Wiggins C., Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Kelly-Reif K., Tomasek L., Zablotska L.B., Laurier D. PUMA – Pooled Uranium Miners Analysis: Cohort Profile. Occup. Environ Med. 2020;77;3:194–200. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105981.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study was carried out within the framework of a state assignment, research topic “Assessment of the radiation situation and health status of personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant involved in working with uranium compounds.”.
Contribution. Concept and design of the study: Kalinkin D.E., Milto I.V., Takhauov R.M.; data collection: Gorina G.V., Litvinova O.V., Samoilova Yu.A., Takhauov A.R., Takhauova L.R.; analysis and interpretation of results: Kalinkin D.E., Takhauov A.R.; literature review: Kalinkin D.E., Takhauova L.R.; preparation of the draft manuscript: Kalinkin D.E., Takhauov A.R., Milto I.V. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-67-72
G.V. Zhuntova, T.V. Azizova, M.V. Bannikova
Multiple Primary Malignant Tumors in Workers Chronically Exposed to Ionizing Radiation
Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorsk, Russia
Contact person: G.V. Zhuntova, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To characterize multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs) in workers occupationally chronically exposed to ionizing radiation.
Material and methods: The study included 22,377 workers employed at reactors, plutonium-production plant and radiochemical plant of the Mayak Production Association (PA) who had been hired in 1948–1982. The study considered cases of MPMTs (verified with the morphological examination) that had been diagnosed in workers before 31 December 2018. The paper describes the structure and provides the comparative characteristics of synchronous and metachronous MPMTs.
Results: 320 cases of MPMTs that were verified with the morphological examination were registered in the cohort: 68.4 % in males and 31.6 % in females. 3 and more malignant tumors were registered in 20 % of workers with MPMTs. MPMTs accounted for 10.5 % of total malignant tumors registered in the cohort. Synchronous MPMTs accounted for 22.8 % in males and for 18.8 % in females. 36.6 % of metachronous MPMTs were diagnosed with an interval of more than 10 years. The structure of MPMTs was dominated by tumors of digestive organs, skin, genital organs (both sexes), respiratory organs (for males), and breast (for females). As for a histological type of tumor, adenocarcinomas and basal-cell carcinomas (both sexes), squamous-cell carcinomas (for males), ductal and lobular tumors (for females) were the most frequent.
Groups of workers with synchronous and metachronous MPMTs demonstrated some significant differences: synchronous MPMTs were diagnosed in later age than the primary metachronous tumor; the numbers of smokers and heavy alcohol drinkers were bigger in the group of workers with synchronous MPMTs, as well as the smoking index. Neither radiation doses nor the duration of occupational exposure at a date of diagnosis of synchronous MPMTs and a primary metachronous tumor were significantly different. Compared to the entire study cohort, the number of workers occupationally exposed at high doses was bigger in workers with MPMTs (above 1.0 Sv for external gamma-ray exposure, and above 1.0 Gy for internal alpha exposure).
Conclusion: MPMTs in workers of the nuclear enterprise were characterized in relation to non-radiation and occupation-related factors.
In the future it is planned to assess the impact of the occupational radiation exposure on the risk of MPMTs in workers of the study cohort considering non-radiation factors.
Keywords: occupational chronic exposure to ionizing radiation, Mayak PA workers, multiple primary malignant tumors, risk factors
For citation: Zhuntova GV, Azizova TV, Bannikova MV. Multiple Primary Malignant Tumors in Workers Chronically Exposed to Ionizing Radiation. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):67–72. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-67-72
References
1. Copur M.S., Manapuram S. Multiple Primary Tumors Over a Lifetime. Oncology (Williston Park). 2019;33;7:629384.
2. Vogt A., Schmid S., Heinimann K., Frick H., Herrmann C., Cerny T., Omlin A. Multiple Primary Tumours: Challenges and Approaches, a Review. ESMO Open. 2017;2;2:e000172.
3. Demoor-Goldschmidt C., de Vathaire F. Review of Risk Factors of Secondary Cancers among Cancer Survivors. Br. J. Radiol. 2019;92;1093:20180390.
4. Li C.I., Nishi N., McDougall J.A., Semmens E.O., Sugiyama H., Soda M., Sakata R., Hayashi M., Kasagi F., Suyama A., Mabuchi K., Davis S., Kodama K., Kopecky K.J. Relationship between Radiation Exposure and Risk of Second Primary Cancers among Atomic Bomb Survivors. Cancer Res. 2010;70;18:7187-198.
5. Nakashima M., Kondo H., Miura S., Soda M., Hayashi T., Matsuo T., Yamashita S., Sekine I. Incidence of Multiple Primary Cancers in Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors: Association with Radiation Exposure. Cancer Sci. 2008;99;1:87-92.
6. Richardson D.B., Cardis E., Daniels R.D., Gillies M., Haylock R., Leuraud K., Laurier D., Moissonnier M., Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Thierry-Chef I., Kesminiene A. Site-Specific Solid Cancer Mortality after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Cohort Study of Workers (INWORKS). Epidemiology. 2018;29;1:31-40.
7. Gillies M., Kuznetsova I., Sokolnikov M., Haylock R., O’Hagan J., Tsareva Y., Labutina E. Lung Cancer Risk from Plutonium: A Pooled Analysis of the Mayak and Sellafield Worker Cohorts. Radiat Res. 2017;188;6:645-660.
8. Sokolnikov M., Preston D., Stram D.O. Mortality from Solid Cancers other than Lung, Liver, and Bone in Relation to External Dose among Plutonium and Non-Plutonium Workers in the Mayak Worker Cohort. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2017;56;1:121-125.
9. Azizova T.V., Day R.D., Wald N., Muirhead C.R., O’Hagan J.A., Sumina M.V., Belyaeva Z.D., Druzhinina M.B., Teplyakov I.I., Semenikhina N.G., Stetsenko L.A., Grigoryeva E.S., Krupenina L.N., Vlasenko E.V. The «Clinic» Medical-Dosimetric Database of Mayak Production Association Workers: Structure, Characteristics and Prospects Of Utilization. Health Phys. 2008;94;5:449-458.
10. Working Group Report. International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers (ICD-0 Third Edition). Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2005;14;4:307-308.
11. Birchall A., Vostrotin V., Puncher M., Efimov A., Dorrian M.D., Sokolova A., Napier B., Suslova K., Miller S., Zhdanov A., Strom D.J., Scherpelz R., Schadilov A. The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013) for Internally Deposited Plutonium: an Overview. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2017;176;1-2:10-31.
12. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1999. 663 p.
13. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М., 2019. 250 с. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Petrova G.V. Zlokachestvennyye Novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2018 Godu (Zabolevaemost’ I Smertnost’) = Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2018 (Morbidity and Mortality). Moscow Publ., 2019. 250 p. (In Russ.)].
14. Feller A., Matthes K.L., Bordoni A., Bouchardy C., Bulliard J.L., Herrmann C., Konzelmann I., Maspoli M., Mousavi M., Rohrmann S., Staehelin K., Arndt V.; NICER Working Group. The Relative Risk of Second Primary Cancers in Switzerland: a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Cancer. 2020;21;20;1:51. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6452-0.
15. Hawkins M., Bhatia S., Henderson T.O., Nathan P.C., Yan A., Teepen J.C., Morton L.M. Subsequent Primary Neoplasms: Risks, Risk Factors, Surveillance, and Future Research. Pediatr. Clin. North. Am. 2020;67;6:1135-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.07.006.
16. Demoor-Goldschmidt C., Supiot S., Mahé M.A., Oberlin O., Allodji R., Haddy N., Helfre S., Vigneron C., Brillaud-Meflah V., Bernier V., Laprie A., Ducassou A., Claude L., Diallo I., de Vathaire F. Clinical and Histological Features of Second Breast Cancers Following Radiotherapy for Childhood and Young Adult Malignancy. B. J. Radiol. 2018;91;1086:20170824. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170824.
17. Adjei Boakye E., Wang M., Sharma A., Jenkins W.D. Risk of Second Primary Cancers in Individuals Diagnosed with Index Smoking- And Non-Smoking- Related Cancers. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020;146;7:1765-1779. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03232-8.
18. Druesne-Pecollo N., Keita Y., Touvier M., et al. Alcohol Drinking and Second Primary Cancer Risk in Patients with Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23;2:324–331.
19. Jégu J., Colonna M., Daubisse-Marliac L., Trétarre B., Ganry O., Guizard A.V., Bara S., Troussard X., Bouvier V., Woronoff A.S., Velten M. The Effect of Patient Characteristics on Second Primary Cancer Risk in France. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-94.
20. Осипов М.В., Сокольников М.Э. Предшествующее злокачественное новообразование как фактор риска второго рака в когорте работников предприятия ядерно-промышленного комплекса // Российский онкологический журнал. 2016. Т.21, № 4. С. 190-94. DOI: 10.18821/1028-9984-2016-21-4-190-194. [Osipov M.V., Sokolnikov M.E. Prior Malignant Neoplasms as a Risk Factor for the Second Cancer in a Cohort of Employees of Enterprises of the Nuclear Industrial Complex. Rossiyskiy Onkologicheskiy Zhurnal = Russian Journal of Oncology. 2016;21;4:190–194. DOI: 10.18821/1028-9984-2016-21-4-190-194. (In Russ.)].
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. This study was carried out with the support of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia under state contract No. 27.501.21.2 dated June 11, 2021. «Modernization of high-tech methods aimed at identifying the medical effects of radiation exposure on the personnel of the Mayak software and the population of the Ural region.»
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024. Vol. 69. № 1
DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-77-82
A. Shkuratov1, S. Golub1, 2, Y. Kirpichev1, A. Moiseev1, 3, I. Korovin1, A. Kryaneva1
Water Bolus Utilization for the Radiation Therapy of Patients
with Isolated Superficial Lesions of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
1 «Medscan» LLC, Moscow, Russia
2 «Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia», Moscow, Russia
3 «RT 7» LLC, Moscow, Russia
Contact person: A.V. Shkuratov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To demonstrate the effectiveness of water bolus, combined with individual immobilization for the treatment of lesions in the pedal region of the foot on a patient with isolated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma lesions.
Material and methods: Construction of individual immobilization devices, simultaneously functioning as a bolus, in two clinical cases of T-cell cutaneous lymphoma radiation therapy in the pedal region of the foot, along with 3D-CRT and VMAT treatment planning, accompanied by retrospective evaluation of interfractional motion.
Results: The proposed methodology demonstrates the effectiveness of the individual immobilization devices in minimizing interfractional motion, as well as the benefit of the bolus effect of the device in achieving optimal dose distribution in the treatment of superficial T-cell lymphoma lesions.
Keywords: radiation therapy, immobilization, bolus, dose evaluation, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
For citation: Shkuratov A, Golub S, Kirpichev Y, Moiseev A, Korovin I, Kryaneva A.Water Bolus Utilization for the Radiation Therapy of Patients with Isolated Superficial Lesions of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2024;69(1):77–82. (In Russian). DOI:10.33266/1024-6177-2024-69-1-77-82
References
1. Taylor E.J. Dorland›s Illustrated Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2000. P. 1038. ISBN 0721662544.
2. Matasar M.J., Zelenetz A.D.. Overview of Lymphoma Diagnosis and Management. Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 2008;46;2:175-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.03.005.
3. Armitage J.O., Gascoyne R.D., Lunning M.A., et al. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. The Lancet. 2017;390;10091:298–310. DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)3240.
4. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1720–1748. DOI:10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2.
5. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению первичных кожных лимфом. Национальное Гематологическое Общество Российское Профессиональное Общество Онкогематологов, 2014. [Klinicheskiye Rekomendatsii po Diagnostike i Lecheniyu Pervichnykh Kozhnykh Limfom = Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas. National Hematological Society Russian Professional Society of Oncohematologists, 2014 (In Russ.)].
6. Streilein J.W. Lymphocyte Traffic. T-Cell Malignancies and the Skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1978;71;3:167–171.
7. Joly P., Vasseur E., Esteve E., et al. Primary Cutaneous Medium and Large Cell Lymphomas Other than Mycosis Fungoides. An Immunohistological and Follow-Up Study on 54 Cases. Br. J. Dermatol. 1995;132;4:506–510.
8. James W.D., et al. Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. Saunders Elsevier. 2020. ISBNs: 9780323547536, 9780323547543.
9. Korgavkar K., Xiong M., Weinstock M. Changing Incidence Trends of Cutaneous Tcell Lymphoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149;11:1295–1299.
10. Willemze R., Jaffe E.S., Burg G., et al. WHO-EORTC Classification for Cutaneous Lymphomas. Blood. 2005;105;10:3768–3785.
11. Harvey N.T., Spagnolo D.V., Wood B.A. ‘Could It Be Mycosis Fungoides?’: an Approach to Diagnosing Patch Stage Mycosis Fungoides. Journal of Hematopathology. 2015;8;4:209–223.
12. Hodak E., Amitay-Laish I. “Mycosis Fungoides: A Great Imitator”. Clinics in Dermatology. Great Imıtators ın Dermatology: Part I. 2019;37;3:255–267. DOI:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.01.004.
13. Rubio-Gonzalez B., Zain J., Rosen S.T., et al. Clinical Manifestations and Pathogenesis of Cutaneous Lymphomas: Current Status and Future Directions. British Journal of Haematology. 2017;176;1:16–36. DOI:10.1111/bjh.14402.
14. Росcийские клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению лимфопролиферативных заболеваний / Под ред. Поддубной И.В., Савченко В.Г. М.: Медиа Медика, 2013. 104 с. ISBN 978-5-905305-07-8. [Rosciyskiye Klinicheskiye Rekomendatsii po Diagnostike i Lecheniyu Limfoproliferativnykh Zabolevaniy = Russian Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Diseases. Ed. Poddubnaya I.V., Savchenko V.G. Moscow, Media Medika Publ., 2013. 104 p. ISBN 978-5-905305-07-8 (In Russ.)].
15. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma. Version 2. 2022;2022.
16. Diederen P.V., van Weelden H., Sanders C.J. et al. Narrowband UVB and Psoralen-UVA in the Treatment of Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: a Retrospective Study. J. Am. AcadDermatol. 2003;48;2:215–219.
17. Gathers R.C., Scherschun L., Malick F., et al. Narrowband UVB Phototherapy for Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides. J. Am. AcadDermatol. 2002;47;2:191–197.
18. Ponte P., Serrão V., Apetato M. Efficacy of Narrowband UVB vs. PUVA in Patients with Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2010;24;6:716–721.
19. Кубанов А.А., Карамова А.Э., Знаменская Л.Ф., Воронцова А.А. Фототерапия грибовидного микоза // Онкогематология. 2019; 14(4): 39–47. [Kubanov A.A., Karamova A.E., Znamenskaya L.F., Vorontsova A.A. Phototherapy of Mycosis Fungoides. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology. 2019;14;4:39–47 (In Russ.)].
20. Querfeld C., Rosen S.T., Kuzel T.M., et al. Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma who Achieved Complete Remission with Psoralen Plus UV-A Monotherapy. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141;3:305–311.
21. Rattanakaemakorn P., Ploydaeng M., Udompanich S., et al. Phototherapy as a Treatment of Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides and Predictive Factors for Disease Recurrence: A 17-Year Retrospective Study. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2021;87;5.
22. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1720–1748. DOI:10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2.
23. Youn H. K., Chow S., Varghese A., et al. Clinical Characteristics and Long-term Outcome of Patients with Generalized Patch and/or Plaque (T2) Mycosis Fungoides. 1999.
24. Butson M., Cheung T., Yu P., et al. Effects on Skin Dose from Unwanted Air Gaps under Bolus in Photon Beam Radiotherapy. Radiation Measurements - RADIAT MEAS. 2000;32:201-204. DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00276-0.
25. Демина О.М., Акилов О.Е., Румянцев А.Г. Т-клеточные лимфомы кожи: современные данные патогенеза, кли-ники и терапии // Онкогематология. 2018. Т.13, № 3. С. 25–38. [Demina O.M., Akilov O.E., Rumyantsev A.G. Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Modern Data of Pathogenesis, Clinics and Therapy. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2018;13;3:25–38 (In Russ.)].
26. Huang K.M., Hsu C.H., Jeng S.C., et al. The Application of Aquaplast Thermoplastic as a Bolus Material in the Radiotherapy of a Patient with Classic Kaposi’s Sarcoma at the Lower Extremity. Anticancer Res. 2006;26;1B:759-762.
27. Muruganandam P., Voruganti S.M., Ostapiak O., et al. Extensive Cutaneous
T-Cell Lymphoma and Challenges with radiation Treatment. Applied Radiation Oncology. 2017:29-32.
28. Majithia L., Rong Y., Siddiqui F., et al. Treating Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma with Highly Irregular Surfaces with Photon Irradiation Using Rice as Tissue Compensator. Front. Oncol. 2015;5:49. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2015.00049.
PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financing. The study had no sponsorship.
Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.
Article received: 20.10.2023. Accepted for publication: 27.11.2023.