JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

The Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety journal ISSN 1024-6177 was founded in January 1956 (before December 30, 1993 it was entitled Medical Radiology, ISSN 0025-8334). In 2018, the journal received Online ISSN: 2618-9615 and was registered as an electronic online publication in Roskomnadzor on March 29, 2018. It publishes original research articles which cover questions of radiobiology, radiation medicine, radiation safety, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine and scientific reviews. In general the journal has more than 30 headings and it is of interest for specialists working in thefields of medicine¸ radiation biology, epidemiology, medical physics and technology. Since July 01, 2008 the journal has been published by State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The founder from 1956 to the present time is the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, and from 2008 to the present time is the Federal Medical Biological Agency.

Members of the editorial board are scientists specializing in the field of radiation biology and medicine, radiation protection, radiation epidemiology, radiation oncology, radiation diagnostics and therapy, nuclear medicine and medical physics. The editorial board consists of academicians (members of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS)), the full member of Academy of Medical Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, corresponding members of the RAS, Doctors of Medicine, professor, candidates and doctors of biological, physical mathematics and engineering sciences. The editorial board is constantly replenished by experts who work in the CIS and foreign countries.

Six issues of the journal are published per year, the volume is 13.5 conventional printed sheets, 88 printer’s sheets, 1.000 copies. The journal has an identical full-text electronic version, which, simultaneously with the printed version and color drawings, is posted on the sites of the Scientific Electronic Library (SEL) and the journal's website. The journal is distributed through the Rospechat Agency under the contract № 7407 of June 16, 2006, through individual buyers and commercial structures. The publication of articles is free.

The journal is included in the List of Russian Reviewed Scientific Journals of the Higher Attestation Commission. Since 2008 the journal has been available on the Internet and indexed in the RISC database which is placed on Web of Science. Since February 2nd, 2018, the journal "Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety" has been indexed in the SCOPUS abstract and citation database.

Brief electronic versions of the Journal have been publicly available since 2005 on the website of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal: http://www.medradiol.ru. Since 2011, all issues of the journal as a whole are publicly available, and since 2016 - full-text versions of scientific articles. Since 2005, subscribers can purchase full versions of other articles of any issue only through the National Electronic Library. The editor of the Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Journal in accordance with the National Electronic Library agreement has been providing the Library with all its production since 2005 until now.

The main working language of the journal is Russian, an additional language is English, which is used to write titles of articles, information about authors, annotations, key words, a list of literature.

Since 2017 the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety has switched to digital identification of publications, assigning to each article the identifier of the digital object (DOI), which greatly accelerated the search for the location of the article on the Internet. In future it is planned to publish the English-language version of the journal Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety for its development. In order to obtain information about the publication activity of the journal in March 2015, a counter of readers' references to the materials posted on the site from 2005 to the present which is placed on the journal's website. During 2015 - 2016 years on average there were no more than 100-170 handlings per day. Publication of a number of articles, as well as electronic versions of profile monographs and collections in the public domain, dramatically increased the number of handlings to the journal's website to 500 - 800 per day, and the total number of visits to the site at the end of 2017 was more than 230.000.

The two-year impact factor of RISC, according to data for 2017, was 0.439, taking into account citation from all sources - 0.570, and the five-year impact factor of RISC - 0.352.

Issues journals

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023. Vol. 68. № 2

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-80-84

I.M. Petojan, N.K. Shandala, A.M. Lyaginskaya, E.G. Metlyaev

Newborn Children Health Status in Families of Male Nuclear Power Plants Personnel

A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

Contact person: I.M. Petoyan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To give a general description of personnel exposure doses and assess the health status of newborn children in families of male nuclear power plants personnel.

Material and methods: The work includes the results of studies of the reproductive health of male personnel of Smolensk, Kursk, Kalinin and Novovoronezh NPPs. The source of information on annual doses of occupational exposure of personnel was the data from the Federal Bank of individual exposure doses of personnel of organizations and the population in the territories served by the FMBA of Russia. The state of newborns was assessed by indicators of physical development and the frequency of birth of a child with pathology. Intrauterine growth retardation, congenital malformations, and other perinatal diseases were noted in the structure of pathological conditions. The source of medical data was information from the individual medical records “History of childbirth” and “History of the development of the newborn” for 2007–2018.

Results: The health status of newborn children born in 2007–2018 in the families of male personnel of the considered NPPs and in control groups did not differ significantly in terms of selected indicators characterizing the adaptive capabilities of newborn children to extrauterine life. The proportion of healthy children ranged from 60 to 73 % of their total number. In the structure of pathological conditions, perinatal conditions made the greatest contribution (from 10 to 17 %). The birth rate of children with congenital malformations did not exceed 34,0±8,9 per 1000 newborns and was significantly lower than the level adopted by the ICRP for calculating radiation risk (60 per 1000). There were no differences in the influence of the maternal factor (age and complications during pregnancy) on the development of the fetus and the health of newborns in the families of male staff and control groups.

According to calculations, the accumulated individual doses of occupational exposure of male personnel before conception of children did not exceed 30 mSv (on average) and for more than 95 % of the personnel – 100 mSv, which is lower than the exposure doses (above 100 mSv) when the negative consequences of exposure of men were reliably observed in the offspring in radiation-epidemiological studies.

Conclusion: No influence of occupational exposure on the health status of newborn children in families of male nuclear power plant personnel has been identified. At the same time, it is proposed to conduct monitoring observations of the state of reproductive health of a small group of male personnel of nuclear power plants, whose accumulated effective doses may exceed 100 mSv.

Keywords: newborn babies, intrauterine growth restriction, congenital malformations, men, personnel, nuclear power plants

For citation: Petoyan IM, Shandala NK, Lyaginskaya AM, Metlyaev EG. Newborn Children Health Status in Families of Male Nuclear Power Plants Personnel. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68(2):80–84. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-80-84

 

References

1. Lyaginskaya A.M., Tukov A.R., Osipov V.A., et al. Congenital Malformations in the Offspring of the Liquidators of the Consequences of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya = Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 2009;49;6:694–702 (In Russ.). 

2. Sosnina S.F., Sokolnikov M.E. Heritable Effects in Offspring Associated with Harmful Exposure to Parents (Literature Review). Radiatsionnaya Gigiyena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12;3:84–95. DOI 10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-3-84–95 (In Russ.).

3. Savisko A.A. Epidemiologicheskiy Monitoring i Mediko-Geneticheskiye Osnovy Formirovaniya Zdorovya Detey Uchastnikov Likvidatsii Posledstviy Avarii na Chernobylskoy Atomnoy Elektrostantsii = Epidemiological Monitoring and Medical Genetic Foundations for the Formation of the Health of Children Involved in the Liquidation of the Consequences of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Extended Abstract of Candidate’s thesis in Medicine. 14.00.09. Moscow Publ., 2008. 38 p. (In Russ.).

4. Zotova S.A. Rol Radiatsionnogo Faktora v Formirovanii Nervno-Psikhicheskikh Narusheniy u Detey, Rodivshikhsya v Semyakh Likvidatorov Avarii na Chaes i Obosnovaniye Taktiki Diagnosticheskikh i Lechebno-Profilakticheskikh Meropriyatiy = The Role of the Radiation Factor in the Formation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Children Born in the Families of the Liquidators of the Chernobyl Accident and the Rationale for the Tactics of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Measures. Extended Abstract of Candidate’s thesis in Medicine. Moscow Publ., 2007 (In Russ.).

5. Korenev N.M., Borisko G.A., Kashina-Yarmak V.A. Health Status of Children, Born in Families of Parents Which Were Irradiated Due to Chernobyl Npp Accident. Zdorovye Rebenka. (Ukr.) 2012;6:66-70 (In Russ.).  

6. Baleva L.S. The Role of Genomic Instability in the Formation of Stochastic Pathology in the Children of the Liquidators of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Meditsina: Teoriya i Praktika = Medicine: Theory and Practice. 2019;4;S:65–66 (In Russ.).

7. Lyaginskaya A.M., Yermalitskiy A.P., Osipov V.A., Petoyan I.M. Reproductive Health of a Person in the System of Radiation Safety. Sbornik, Posvyashchennyy 70-Letiyu FGBU GNTS RF FMBTS im. A.I. Burnazyana (1946–2016 g.) = Collection Dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of the Federal State Budgetary Institution State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation of the FMBTS im. A.I. Burnazyan (1946–2016). Мoscow Publ., 2016 (In Russ.).

8. Osipov, V.A. Lyaginskaya A.M., Petoyan I.M., et al. Innate Development Defects in Children of Smolensk NPP Personnel and their Connection with the Occupational Exposure to the Fathers. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety 2014;59;4:18–24 (In Russ.).

9. Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009). Sanitary and Epidemiological Rules and Regulations. Мoscow Publ., 2009. 100 p. (In Russ.).

10. Panfilov A.P. Evolution of the System Supporting Radiation Safety in Nuclear Industry of Russia and its Current Status. Apparatura i Novosti Radiatsionnykh Izmereniy = ANRI. 2016;1:2–14. (In Russ.).

11. Tsovyanov A.G., Kosterev V.V., Kryuchkov V.V., et al. Dozy Oblucheniya Personala Organizatsiy i Naseleniya na Territoriyakh, Obsluzhivayemykh Fmba Rossii i Minoborony Rossii, v 2010 g. = Exposure Doses of Personnel of Organizations and the Population in the Territories Served by the FMBA of Russia and the Ministry of Defense of Russia, in 2010. Information and Analytical Reference Book. Мoscow Publ., 2012. 86 p. (In Russ.).

12. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD).  URL: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases. (Accessed 27.05.2022).

13. Lyaginskaya A.M., Petoyan I.M., Yermalitskiy A.P., et al. Radiation-Hygienic Aspects of the State of Reproductive Health of Male Npp Personnel. Gigiyena i Sanitariya = Hygiene and Sanitation. 2017;96;9:883–887. DOI 10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-9-883-887 (In Russ.).

14. Rosstat. Zdorovye Materi i Rebenka za 2013–2018 g. = Rosstat. Maternal and Child Health 2013–2018 (In Russ.).

15. Publication 103 ICRP. Ed. Kiselev M.F., Shandala N.K. Moscow Publ., 2009. 312 p. (In Russ.).

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)


Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.11.2022. Accepted for publication: 25.01.2023.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023. Vol. 68. № 2

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-85-91

R.M. Takhauov1, 2, D.E. Kalinkin1, 2, A.P. Blinov1, G.V. Gorina1, O.V. Litvinova1, I.V. Milto1, 2

Dosimetric Characteristics of the Cohort of the Siberian Chemical Plant Personnel in the Period 1950–2010

1Seversk Biophysical Research Center, Seversk, Russia

2Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia

Contact person: I.V. Milto, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To give a dosimetric characterization of the personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant (SCP) subjected to prolonged technogenic occupational exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) in the period 1950–2010, as well as the cohort of the personnel of the SCP involved in working with uranium compounds.

Material and methods: SCP is one of the largest and oldest complexes of nuclear industry enterprises in the world, having experience in continuous dosimetric monitoring of personnel for more than 60 years. The database of the regional medical-dosimetric register of employees of the SCP (RMDR) contains information about all employees of the SCP for the entire history of the enterprise, including personal data of medical, dosimetric and professional nature of 65.350 employees of the SCP, of which more than 32.000 people were exposed to chronic technogenic occupational radiation in the range of low doses. The archive of the medical documentation of the Seversk Biophysical Research Center contains 55.569 medical histories of the employees of the SCP, 29.800 outpatient records and 11.953 autopsy protocols.

Results: Employees of the radiochemical, chemical-metallurgical, sublimate and separation industries of the SCP were subjected to combined (external and internal) irradiation, while the personnel of the reactor production were exposed exclusively to external irradiation. Auxiliary production workers were mainly exposed to non-radiation factors. Individual dosimetric control (IDC) of external exposure was carried out for all workers who were in the zone of exposure to external radiation sources. The average accumulated dose of external radiation for employees of the SCP was 28.3 mSv. IDC of internal irradiation was carried out for all workers employed at the production site, where the excess of the regulatory level of the concentration of radionuclides in the air of the working area was detected. The average value of the activity of radionuclides in the urine of SCP workers does not exceed 0.74 Bq. The life status has been clarified for 80.8 % of the employees of the SCP. About 3.500 employees of the agricultural complex have an IDC for internal irradiation from uranium based on the results of a biophysical examination. The life status is established for 75 % of employees of the uranium cohort.

Conclusion: For the first time, a dosimetric characteristic of a cohort of 65.350 workers of the SCP (21 % women) who started work in the period 1950–2010 was given. The cohort of the staff of the SCP is suitable for conducting epidemiological studies in order to establish the risks associated with the impact on the human body of technogenic occupational exposure to IR.

Keywords: occupational exposure, ionizing radiation, uranium, plutonium, dosimetric data

For citation: Takhauov RM, Kalinkin DE, Blinov AP, Gorina GV, Litvinova OV, Milto IV. Dosimetric Characteristics of the Cohort of the Siberian Chemical Plant Personnel in the Period 1950–2010. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68(2):85–91. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-85-91

 

References

1. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC, NRC, The National Academies Press, 2006. DOI: 10.17226/11340.

2. Epidemiological Studies of Radiation and Cancer. V.I. Annex A. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York, UNSCEAR, 2008.

3. Calabrese E.J., O’Connor M.K. Estimating Risk of Low Radiation Doses – a Critical Review of the Beir Vii Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (Lnt) Hypothesis. Radiat. Res. 2014;182;5:463–474. DOI: 10.1667/RR13829.1.

4. Lane R.S., Frost S.E., Howe G.R., Zablotska L.B. Mortality (1950–1999) and Cancer Incidence (1969–1999) in the Cohort of Eldorado Uranium Workers. Radiat. Res. 2010;174;6:773–785. DOI: 10.1667/RR2237.1.

5. Haylock R.G.E., Gillies M., Hunter N., et al. Cancer Mortality and Incidence Following External Occupational Radiation Exposure: An Update of the 3rd Analysis of the Uk National Registry for Radiation Workers. Brit. J. Cancer. 2018;119;5:631–637. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0184-9.

6. Richardson D.B., Cardis E., Daniels R.D., et al. Site-Specific Solid Cancer Mortality after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Cohort Study of Workers (INWORKS). Epidemiology. 2018;29;1:31–40. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000761.

7. Gillies M., Haylock R. The Cancer Mortality and Incidence Experience of Workers at British Nuclear Fuels plc, 1946–2005. J. Radiol. Prot. 2014;34;3:595–623. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/3/595.

8. Exposures of the Public and Workers from Various Sources of Radiation. V.I. Annex B. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. New York, UNITED NATIONS, 2010.

9. Bouville A., Kryuchkov V. Increased Occupational Radiation Doses: Nuclear Fuel Cycle. Health Phys. 2014;106;2:259–271. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000066. 

10. Silver S.R., Bertke S.J., Hein M.J., et al. Mortality and Ionising Radiation Exposures Among Workers Employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951–1985). Occup. Environ. Med. 2013;70;7:453–463. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100768.

11. Yiin J.H., Anderson J.L., Bertke S.J., Tollerud D.J. Dose-Response Relationships between Internally-Deposited Uranium and Select Health Outcomes in Gaseous Diffusion Plant Workers, 1948–2011. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2018;61;7:605–614. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22858.

12. Zhivin S., Guseva Canu I., Davesne E., et al. Circulatory Disease in French Nuclear Fuel Cycle Workers Chronically Exposed to Uranium: A Nested Case-Control Study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018;75;4:270–276. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104575.

13. Golden A.P., Ellis E.D., Cohen S.S., et al. Updated Mortality Analysis of the Mallinckrodt Uranium Processing Workers, 1942–2012 . Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2022;98;4:701–721. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1569773.

14. Kreuzer M., Dufey F., Laurier D., et al. Mortality from Internal and External Radiation Exposure in a Cohort of Male German Uranium Millers, 1946–2008. Int. Arch. Occ. Env. Hea. 2015;88;4:431–441. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-014-0973-2.

15. Biological Effects of Selected Internal Emitters-Uranium. Annex D. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2016 Report to the General Assembly. New York, United Nations, 2017. DOI: 10.18356/2055d684-e.

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)


Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The research was carried out within the framework of the state task, the topic of research: «Assessment of the radiation situation and the state of health of the personnel of the Siberian Chemical Plant involved in working with uranium compounds.»

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.11.2022. Accepted for publication: 25.01.2023.

 

 

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023. Vol. 68. № 2

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-95-98

V.N. Klochkov, S.M. Shinkarev, O.A. Kochetkov, V.G. Barchukov, A.V. Simakov

To the Discussion on Amendments to Nrb-99/2009 and to Osporb-99/2010

A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

Contact person: Vladimir Nikolaevich Klochkov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For citation: Klochkov VN, Shinkarev SM, Kochetkov OA, Barchukov VG, Simakov AV. To the Discussion on Amendments to Nrb-99/2009 and to Osporb-99/2010. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68(2):95–98. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-95-98

 


References

1. Vedernikova M.V., Linge I.I., Panchenko S.V., Strizhova S.V., Supatayeva O.A., Utkin S.S. Aktualnyye Voprosy Vneseniya Izmeneniy v Federalnyy Zakon ot 9 Yanvarya 1996 g. № 3-FZ «O Radiatsionnoy Bezopasnosti Naseleniya» = Topical Issues of Amending the Federal Law Dated January 9, 1996 No. 3-FZ “On Radiation Safety of the Population” Moscow Publ., 2020. 22 p. ISBN 978-5-6041296-5-4 (In Russ.).

2. Kochetkov O.A., Klochkov V.N., Panfilov A.P., Usoltsev V.Yu. Scientific and Methodological Support of Radiation Safety in the Organizations of the State Corporation “Rosatom” V.1. Metodicheskoye Obespecheniye Radiatsionnogo Kontrolya v Atomnoy Otrasli = Methodological Support of Radiation Monitoring in the Nuclear Industry. Moscow Publ., 2016. P. 24-40 (In Russ.).

3. Kochetkov O.A., Panfilov A.P., Usoltsev V.Yu., Klochkov V.N., Shinkarev S.M., Tsovyanov A.G., Simakov A.V. Radiation Hygiene and Safety of Nuclear Industry. Gigiyena i Sanitariya = Hygiene and Sanitation. 2017;69;9:868-874 (In Russ.).

4. Abramov Yu.V., Klochkov V.N., Kochetkov O.A., Simakov A.V., Nurlybayev K. Current Requirements to Establishment of the Radiation Monitoring System. Apparatura i Novosti Radiatsionnykh Izmereniy = ANRI. 2019;3:3-10 (In Russ.).

5. Simakov A.V., Abramov Yu.V. Radiation Safety Standards and Basic Health Rules for Radiation Safety: Proposal on the Development of New Versions. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64;5:15-19. DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2019-64-5-15-19 (In Russ.).

6. Shinkarev S.M., Kochetkov O.A., Klochkov V.N., Barchukov V.G. To Discussion on Amendments to the Federal Law as of 09.01.1996 No. 3-FZ «About Radiation Safety of the Public». Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020;65;3:77-78. DOI 10.12737/1024-6177-2020-65-3-77-78 (In Russ.).

7. Kochetkov O.A., Klochkov V.N., Samoylov A.S., Shandala N.K. Harmonization of the Russian Federation Legislation with Current International Recommendations. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66;6:111–115. DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-111-115 (In Russ.).

8. Kochetkov O.A., Klochkov V.N., Samoylov A.S., Shandala N.K, Barchukov V.G., Shinkarev S.M. General Principles of Legal, Standard and Methodical Regulation of Radiation Safety. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2022;61;1:19–26. DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2022-67-1-19-26 (In Russ.).

9. Gubin A.T., Sakovich V.A. On Some Conceptual Issues of Changing the Federal Law «On Radiation Safety of the Population». Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020;65;6:83-84. DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2020-65-6-83-84 (In Russ.).

10. Serebryakov B.Ye. About of the Necessary of Corrections of the NRB-99/2009 and OSPORB-99/2010. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020;65;3:27-30. DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2020-65-3-27-30 (In Russ.).

11. Serebryakov B.Ye. On the Need to Revise Government Decree No. 1069 dated 10/19/2012. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66;2:83-88 (In Russ.).

12. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115. Vienna, IAEA, 1996.

13. Application of the Concepts of Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance: Safety Guide. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004. ISBN 92-0-109404-3.

14. Derivation of Activity Concentration Values for Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005. ISBN 92–0–113104–6.

15. Radiation: Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014. ISBN 978–92–0–135310–8.

16. Principles and Methods for Establishing Concentrations and Quantities (Exemption values) below which Reporting is not Required in the European Directive. Commission of the European Communities, 1993, Doc. XI-028/93.

17. Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Wastes: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1987.

18. IAEA-EPR-D-Values 2006. Dangerous Quantities of Radioactive Material (D-Values). Vienna, IAEA, 2006.

19. URL: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-10/chapter-III/part-835?toc=1.

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.11.2022. Accepted for publication: 25.01.2023.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023. Vol. 68. № 2

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-92-94

B.E. Serebryakov

Recommendations for Amendments to the NRB-99/2009 and to the OSPORB-99/2010

A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia


Contact person: B.E. Serebryakov, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: In Russia, the main regulatory documents on radiation safety are being adjusted: Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009) and Basic Sanitary Rules (OSPORB-99/2010). The purpose of the work is to remove and correct certain incorrect provisions of these documents.

Results: The disadvantages of NRB-99/2009 related to the values of the minimum significant activity and the minimum significant specific activity of radionuclides were identified and justified. 

In OSPORB-99/2010, the inadmissibility of introducing minimally licensed activity of radionuclides in closed sources of ionizing radiation into Sanitary Rules was identified and justified. An unacceptably large amount of this activity can lead to overexposure of personnel and the public in incidents with these sources.

Conclusions: The following recommendations were made for the adjustment of NRB-99/2009 and OSPORB-99-2010:

– in NRB-99/2009, it is recommended to completely remove the minimally significant specific activities, and use the minimally significant activities in accordance with NRB-76/87.

– in OSPORB-99/2010, it is recommended to remove all provisions related to the minimum licensed activity of radionuclides in closed sources of ionizing radiation.

Key words: radiation safety, regulatory documents, minimally significant activity, minimally significant specific activity, closed sources of ionizing radiation

For citation: Serebryakov BE. Recommendations for Amendments to the NRB-99/2009 and to the OSPORB-99/2010. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68(2):92–94. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-92-94

 

References

1. SanPiN 2.6.1.2523 – 09 Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009) (In Russ.). 

2. SP 2.6.1.2612-10 Basic Sanitary Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB-99/2010) (In Russ.).

3. Serebryakov B.Ye. About of the Necessary of Corrections of the NRB-99/2009 and OSPORB-99/2010. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2020;65;3:27–30 (In Russ.).

4. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. Safety Series № 115. IAEA, Vienna, 1997. 

5. Serebryakov B.Ye. About of the Necessary the Review of the Government Decision of the Russian Federation from October 19, 2012 No. 1069. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66;2:83–88 (In Russ.).

6. Radiation Safety Standards NRB-76/87 and Basic Sanitary Rules for Working with Radioactive Substances and Other Sources of iONIZING Radiation OSP-72/86. Moscow Publ., 1988 (In Russ.).

7. 10 CFR Part 20 – Standards for Protection Against Radiation.

8. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources. General Safety Requirements No. GSR Part 3. Vienna, IAEA, 2015.

9. Dangerous Quantities of Radioactive Material (D-Values) Emergency Preparedness and Response. EPR-D-VALUES 2006. Vienna, IAEA, 2010. 

10. 10 CFR Part 835 - Occupational Radiation Protection.

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)


Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financing. The study had no sponsorship.

Contribution. Article was prepared with equal participation of the authors.

Article received: 20.11.2022. Accepted for publication: 25.01.2023.

 

Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023. Vol. 68. № 2

DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-2-99-104

Leonid Andreevich Ilyin (on the Occasion of His 95th Birthday)

I.L. Efimova

A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia.


Contact person: Efimova Irina Leonidovna, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

ABSTRACT

Full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor Leonid Andreevich Ilyin is a recognized world authority in the field of radiation medicine, biomedical and hygienic aspects of radiation protection. From 1968 to 2008 for 40 years – director and scientific director of the State Scientific Center of the Order of Lenin of the Institute of Biophysics. Since 2008 – Honorary President of the Federal State Budgetary Institution «State Research Center of the Russian Federation – A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center» (after the merger of the Institute of Biophysics and Clinical Hospital No. 6).

Thanks to the work of Academician Ilyin, his students and colleagues, highly effective drugs for the prevention and treatment of acute radiation injuries were created, tested and entered into domestic practice. Repeatedly took part as a supervisor in testing the developed drugs in field conditions. He is a veteran of special risk units. L.A. Ilyin is the first scientist in the world who developed and substantiated the forecast of the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, subsequently confirmed by leading foreign and domestic experts.

Keywords: biophysics, radiation safety, Chernobyl acsident, Ilyin

For citation: Efimova IL. Leonid Andreevich Ilyin (on the occasion of his 100th birthday). Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2023;68(2):99-104. DOI: 10.33266/1024-6177-2022-67-4-99-104

 

 

 PDF (RUS) Full-text article (in Russian)

 

Contact Information

 

46, Zhivopisnaya st., 123098, Moscow, Russia Phone: +7 (499) 190-95-51. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Journal location

Attendance

4008123
Today
Yesterday
This week
Last week
This month
Last month
For all time
2715
6045
21756
30856
137829
124261
4008123

Forecast today
13248


Your IP:216.73.217.31